Joshua Schiller

Person
Mentions
18
Relationships
5
Events
2
Documents
9

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
5 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Sigrid McCawley
Business associate
5
1
View
person Teresa Helm
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Jane Doe 1000
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Maria Farmer
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Juliette Bryant
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2020-02-24 N/A Service of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of Law upon the counsel listed in Exhibit A Via Electronic Mail and U.S... View
2019-04-16 N/A Filing of Document 1 in Case 1:19-cv-03377 Court (implied) View

028.pdf

This document is an Affidavit of Service filed on March 20, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. John Murphy of Troutman Sanders LLP attests that he served the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and supporting memorandum to attorneys David Boies II, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Joshua Schiller of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP on February 24, 2020.

Legal affidavit (affidavit of service)
2025-12-26

004.pdf

This document is a civil summons issued on November 13, 2019, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). The summons notifies the defendants that a lawsuit has been filed against them and instructs them to respond within 21 days. The second page contains a blank Proof of Service form.

Summons in a civil action (legal document)
2025-12-26

003.pdf

This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10476). The plaintiff, Teresa Helm, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint on the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, within 21 days.

Summons in a civil action
2025-12-26

003.pdf

This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10474-NRB). Plaintiff Maria Farmer is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days of service, with Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP listed as the plaintiff's attorney.

Summons in a civil action (ao 440)
2025-12-26

004.pdf

This document is a civil summons issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 18, 2019. The plaintiff, Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The defendants are directed to respond to the complaint through their attorney, Bennet J. Moskowitz, or the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller.

Legal document (summons in a civil action)
2025-12-26

003.pdf

This document is a civil summons filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-10479. Plaintiff Juliette Bryant is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The defendants are instructed to respond within 21 days to plaintiff's attorney Joshua Schiller.

Summons in a civil action (ao 440)
2025-12-26

EFTA00030155.pdf

Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.

Email thread / news article
2025-12-25

EFTA00026703.pdf

This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.

Email / news article
2025-12-25

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017962.jpg

This document is the final signature page (page 28) of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in Case 1:19-cv-03377. It includes a prayer for relief in excess of $75,000 and a formal Jury Demand. The document is signed by attorneys Joshua Schiller and Sigrid McCawley of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to Congress.

Legal court filing (complaint/pleading - signature page)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity