| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Joshua I. Schiller
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accuser accused |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Estate of Jeffrey Epstein
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sabina Mariella
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Accuser accused |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Plaintiff vs executor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Plaintiff vs defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Victim perpetrator co conspirator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interaction | Multiple individuals allegedly interacted with Epstein and Ms. Maxwell during the period of charg... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Teresa Helm was sexually trafficked by Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Ghislaine Maxwell. She was recr... | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2020-10-15 | N/A | Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Plaintiff Teresa Helm submitted her claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Plaintiff Teresa Helm seeks to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation to stay the action for 60 days. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-16 | N/A | Defendants served responses and objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests. | N/A | View |
| 2020-03-20 | N/A | Filing of letter requesting oral argument in Helm v. Indyke et al. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-03-10 | N/A | Plaintiff served 68 Requests for Production and 14 Interrogatories on Defendants. | N/A | View |
| 2020-03-09 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Plaintiff's opposition. | Court | View |
| 2020-03-09 | N/A | New deadline for Plaintiff's opposition (extended from March 6). | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Andrew Villacastin representing Teresa Helm | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Deadline for Plaintiff's opposition | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Parties exchanged initial Rule 26 disclosures. | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Boies | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Filing of Summons in Civil Action Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF | SDNY (Southern District of ... | View |
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants. | Daniel Patrick Moynihan Uni... | View |
| 2002-06-01 | N/A | The 'Relevant Time Period' defined by Defendants for discovery, during which Plaintiff alleges sh... | New York, NY | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Epstein sexually assaulted Teresa Helm during a massage in New York. | New York | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Trafficking of Ms. Teresa Helm | Not specified in text | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Trafficking of Teresa Helm | Unspecified | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Alleged interaction between Plaintiff and Epstein in New York where he made intimidating statements. | New York, NY | View |
A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on October 15, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Teresa Helm agrees to dismiss her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate with prejudice after accepting an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document serves to formally close the case.
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Debra Freeman that the plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and is awaiting a determination. Consequently, both parties request a 45-day extension to the current stay of discovery to preserve resources while the compensation claim is processed.
A Notice of Change of Address filed on July 10, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Valerie Sirota notifies the court that her firm's name has changed from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the physical address remains the same.
This document is a 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on July 9, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Case No. 19-CV-10476). Attorney Charles L. Glover notifies the court that his firm has changed names from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the physical address at 875 Third Avenue, New York, remains the same. Glover confirms he will continue to serve as counsel of record on the case.
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on June 12, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, regarding the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agreed to stay (pause) the legal proceedings for 60 days to allow the Plaintiff, Teresa Helm, to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation. If the claims are resolved through the program, the plaintiff agrees to discontinue the lawsuit with prejudice.
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the US District Court (SDNY) for the case Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). It establishes legal protocols for designating, handling, and protecting confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial information, and the names of alleged minor victims. The order binds the parties, their attorneys, and third parties to specific non-disclosure requirements.
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
This document is a legal letter dated May 11, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley (representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein estate) alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically their refusal to produce documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy and to answer interrogatories regarding email accounts used by Epstein. McCawley argues that the Defendants are engaging in obstructionist delay tactics.
A Notice of Appearance filed on May 8, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Valerie Sirota of Troutman Sanders LLP enters her appearance as counsel for defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, in a lawsuit brought by plaintiff Teresa Helm.
A Notice of Appearance filed on May 8, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-CV-10476-PGG-DCF). Attorney Charles L. Glover of Troutman Sanders LLP enters his appearance as counsel for defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein in the lawsuit brought by Teresa Helm.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on May 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-CV-10476-PGG-DCF). Attorney Matthew J. Aaronson of Troutman Sanders LLP enters his appearance as counsel for defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acting in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein, in the case brought by plaintiff Teresa Helm.
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated May 8, 2020. The letter requests the denial of Plaintiffs' (Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, Juliette Bryant) request for a pre-motion conference regarding discovery disputes, characterizing the Plaintiffs' actions as premature and a violation of court rules regarding meet-and-confer obligations. The defense argues that good faith discussions were ongoing and accuses Plaintiffs of rushing to court to distract from their own refusal to produce medical records.
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.
This document is a court filing dated April 28, 2020, submitted by attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Paul Gardephe in the Teresa Helm case. It encloses a newly issued Opinion & Order by Judge Paul Engelmayer in a separate case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which grants the Estate's motion to dismiss claims for punitive damages. The court ruled that under New York law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)) and likely US Virgin Islands common law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor because they serve a penal rather than remedial purpose.
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated April 15, 2020, requesting a 30-day extension for various deadlines in civil cases filed by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Epstein Estate executors. The request cites the ongoing pandemic as the reason for the delay and lists specific new dates for discovery and reports, which Judge Freeman approved via a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement on the same day.
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) moving to dismiss a complaint by plaintiff Teresa Helm. The defendants argue that Helm's claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations and that she has failed to prove 'extraordinary circumstances' or a relevant criminal indictment to toll this period. Additionally, the defense argues that punitive damages are not recoverable against an estate under either New York law (where the alleged torts occurred) or USVI law (where the estate is probated).
This document is a letter dated March 20, 2020, from attorney Joshua I. Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. It requests oral argument regarding the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in the case of Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York law and doctrines of equitable estoppel/tolling, contrary to the Defendants' assertions.
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Teresa Helm, the Plaintiff, in opposition to the Defendants' (executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate) motion to dismiss her complaint. It argues against the dismissal of claims as untimely, asserts the applicability of equitable estoppel and tolling, and contends that punitive damages are recoverable under Virgin Islands law, guided by New York's choice-of-law principles.
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed on March 20, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. John Murphy of Troutman Sanders LLP attests that he served the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and supporting memorandum to attorneys David Boies II, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Joshua Schiller of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP on February 24, 2020.
This document is a legal memorandum filed by the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate moving to dismiss a complaint by Teresa Helm. The defendants argue that Helm's claims of battery and emotional distress, stemming from an alleged 2002 sexual assault in New York when she was 22, are time-barred by the statute of limitations which expired in 2005. They further argue that statutory exceptions for criminal proceedings do not apply because Epstein's indictment involved trafficking minors, whereas Helm was an adult, and that punitive damages are legally barred against an estate.
This document is a 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on March 9, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case Teresa Helm v. Indyke, et al. (Case No. 19-cv-10476-PGG). Attorney Sabina Mariella notifies the court and parties that she has moved from the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and will continue as counsel of record on the case.
A Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP enters his appearance as counsel for Plaintiff Teresa Helm in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
A letter filed on February 20, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Moskowitz requests a one-day extension for filing a Motion to Dismiss due to illness, pushing the deadline to February 24, 2020. The document includes a memo endorsement signed by Judge Gardephe on February 22, 2020, granting the request.
Legal correspondence dated February 20, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Paul G. Gardephe regarding the case Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter requests a one-business-day extension for filing the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due to the attorney's recent illness, adjusting the deadline to February 24, 2020.
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated February 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman granted a motion for Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP to be admitted Pro Hac Vice as counsel for the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Epstein's estate).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-15 | Received | Epstein Victims' ... | Teresa Helm | $0.00 | Offer of compensation accepted by Plaintiff res... | View |
Thanking her for visiting New York and letting her know they would need to decide whether or not they wanted to hire her.
Discussing possibility of working as a 'traveling masseuse' for a 'wealthy couple' involving lavish parties, expensive clothes, and international travel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity