DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg

1.37 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket sheet
File Size: 1.37 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of court orders and letters regarding pretrial schedule, suppression motions, and perjury counts.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
District Judge signing orders and receiving letters.
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
Christian R. Everdell Defense Attorney
Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell filing letter re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule.
Sigrid McCawley Attorney
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP attorney requesting to bring electronic devices.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell filing response regarding suppression motions.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USA
Plaintiff/Government (Department of Justice)
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Law firm filing request for electronic devices
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals cited in legal precedent (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.)

Timeline (2 events)

04/21/2021
Court Order regarding trial scheduling
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
04/22/2021
Memo Endorsement granting redactions
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in relation to a grand jury sitting.

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Christian R. Everdell
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Maurene Comey Prosecutor/Employer USA
LETTER by USA... from AUSAs Maurene Comey

Key Quotes (4)

"The Court will schedule a trial date for the severed perjury counts after trial of the non-perjury counts is completed."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
Quote #1
"the Court intends to defer resolution of the pending motions to suppress (including resolution of the request for an evidentiary hearing) until after the trial on the non-perjury counts."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court grants the Government's proposed redaction and sealing requests."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
Quote #3
"the Court finds that the specific arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,602 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page32 of 91
| | | the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse (Dkt. No. 125) is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/21)(jbo) (Entered: 04/21/2021)
04/21/2021 | 229 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 21, 2021 re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 04/21/2021)
04/21/2021 | 230 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated April 21, 2021 re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/21/2021)
04/21/2021 | 231 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court will schedule a trial date for the severed perjury counts after trial of the non-perjury counts is completed. Given that and in light of the representations in the Government's April 21, 2021 letter, see Dkt. No. 227, the Court intends to defer resolution of the pending motions to suppress (including resolution of the request for an evidentiary hearing) until after the trial on the non-perjury counts. If either side objects, counsel shall state the basis for any objection by letter on or before by 5pm on Thursday, April 22, 2021.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/22/2021 | 232 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 222 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 20, 2021 re: Redactions to Defense Reply Briefs and Exhibits. ENDORSEMENT: The Court grants the Government's proposed redaction and sealing requests. This conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, however, the Court finds that the specific arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995). The Government's letter does not discuss Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6. By April 23, 2021, the parties shall either propose redactions to Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6, which was originally filed under seal, or they shall indicate to the Court that they seek no redactions and file it on ECF. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/22/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/22/2021 | 233 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid McCawley dated 04-22-2021 re: Request to Bring Electronic Devices Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Electronic Device Form)(McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/22/2021 | 234 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated April 22, 2021 re: Response to Dkt. No. 227, Governments April 21, 2021 Letter re Ms. Maxwells Motions to Suppress (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/22/2021 | 235 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 22, 2021 re: Response to Defense Request for Adjournment Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/22/2021 | 236 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 22, 2021 re: Response to the Court's April 22, 2021 Order Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 04/22/2021)
04/22/2021 | 237 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 233 LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid McCawley dated 04-22-2021 re: Request to Bring Electronic Devices Document.
DOJ-OGR-00020418

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document