This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of court orders and letters regarding pretrial schedule, suppression motions, and perjury counts.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
District Judge signing orders and receiving letters.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters for the USA.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell filing letter re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule.
|
| Sigrid McCawley | Attorney |
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP attorney requesting to bring electronic devices.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell filing response regarding suppression motions.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA |
Plaintiff/Government (Department of Justice)
|
|
| Boies Schiller Flexner LLP |
Law firm filing request for electronic devices
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Court of Appeals cited in legal precedent (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to a grand jury sitting.
|
"The Court will schedule a trial date for the severed perjury counts after trial of the non-perjury counts is completed."Source
"the Court intends to defer resolution of the pending motions to suppress (including resolution of the request for an evidentiary hearing) until after the trial on the non-perjury counts."Source
"The Court grants the Government's proposed redaction and sealing requests."Source
"the Court finds that the specific arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,602 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document