Missouri
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Duren
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Douglas Frye
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Legal case: Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028427.jpg
This document is a news article, likely from September 2018, detailing President Trump's frustration with the Republican response to sexual assault allegations against his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. The article covers Trump's public remarks urging a more aggressive defense, the political dynamics of the situation including Christine Blasey Ford's scheduled testimony, and the emergence of a new allegation published by The New Yorker. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028427' suggests this article was collected as evidence for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022377.jpg
This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, provides a profile of expected US Senate committee leadership for the upcoming Congress. It details the chairmen and ranking members for key committees and analyzes the various political scenarios influencing these appointments, such as retirements, term limits, and senators' strategic choices. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is purely about US Senate politics and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374.jpg
This document, produced by EY and labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374, is a political analysis of the 2016 US election results. It discusses the Republican party's control of the White House and Congress and provides a detailed breakdown of outcomes in key Senate races across multiple states. This document is exclusively about US politics and contains no information, mentions, or connections to Jeffrey Epstein or any related subjects.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022310.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, containing a legal argument against a new National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule. The author contends that the NLRB exceeded its statutory authority by mandating that employers post a notice of employee rights, arguing that Congress did not delegate this specific 'gap-filling' power and that failure to post does not constitute an 'unfair labor practice' under the existing framework of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The document cites numerous court cases and legislative history to support the position that the NLRB's rule is an overreach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018870.jpg
Two opinion columns from November 9, 2012, analyze the aftermath of the recent presidential election. Gail Collins satirically discusses the "fiscal cliff" and the Republican reaction to losing, while Nicholas D. Kristof argues that the Republican party must adapt to changing demographics (Hispanic voters, women) or risk becoming irrelevant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity