Missouri
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Duren
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Douglas Frye
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Legal case: Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 | N/A | View |
EFTA00038698.pdf
This FBI Electronic Communication from July 2021 documents the acquisition of a Missouri birth certificate for an unnamed individual related to the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking case. An agent visited the Missouri Department of Health in Jefferson City to obtain the record, which lists Springfield, MO as the place of birth and identifies the subject's parents. The physical certificate was mailed to the case agent via FedEx.
EFTA00032942.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated February 13, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the Roger Stone sentencing, fraud cases involving Theranos and Air Charter Co., and investigations into university funding. A specific article highlights a defamation dispute between attorneys David Boies and Alan Dershowitz, centering on Boies' remarks regarding Dershowitz's alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00032459.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter dated October 1, 2018. It summarizes various legal and corporate news stories, including the Deutsche Bank Libor trial, Elon Musk's SEC settlement, an emoluments suit against Donald Trump, and the Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination. The document lists numerous law firms and companies in its sidebars, including 'Epstein Becker Green', which is likely the reason for its inclusion in this collection, though it refers to a law firm and not Jeffrey Epstein personally.
EFTA00028666.pdf
This document is an internal email dated November 4, 2020, containing 'SDNY Press Clippings.' It lists various news articles of interest to the Southern District of New York, specifically highlighting a NY Post article about Epstein victims dropping cases against Ghislaine Maxwell and the Epstein estate, as well as an update on the Joshua Schulte trial. The email also includes links to broader news topics such as the 2020 election, financial crimes, and international affairs.
EFTA00027301.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter from the DOJ to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 5, 2021. It lists materials being turned over, including files recovered from discs seized at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence, images from his electronic devices, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a 1995 Oxford letter. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
EFTA00027296.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 4, 2021. It lists produced materials including FBI recovered metadata, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a letter from 1995 related to Oxford. The letter also clarifies new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
EFTA00025392.pdf
This document is a Law360 email newsletter from July 21, 2020, summarizing various legal news stories. Key topics include the resentencing of Sheldon Silver, a harassment suit at Fox News, and the shooting at the home of Judge Esther Salas, which notes her involvement in a case concerning Deutsche Bank's ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The newsletter also covers various corporate litigations, bankruptcy rulings, and general counsel appointments.
EFTA00010339.pdf
A letter from UMB (a financial institution) to the Southern District of New York dated June 10, 2020. The letter is a negative response to a subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that UMB was unable to find any of the requested records for her.
EFTA00010105.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated November 18, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests a ruling that the birth certificates of Minor Victims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 be deemed self-authenticating under Federal Rules of Evidence 902 and 902(4), thereby avoiding the need to call records custodians from various states (RI, MO, NY, CA, MA) to testify at trial. The defense had refused to stipulate to the authenticity of these records despite having no reason to doubt them.
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
This document excerpt details various legal agreements and plea agreements across different U.S. judicial districts, outlining the scope and binding nature of these agreements between defendants and specific United States Attorney offices or divisions of the Department of Justice. It emphasizes which entities are bound by each agreement and which are not. The document includes specific case citations with dates, defendants, and ECF numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00000207.tif
This document appears to be page 7 of a legal brief or DOJ Office of General Research (OGR) report discussing the enforceability of plea agreements. It argues that the United States government must honor the plain language of written plea deals, even if it prevents a meritorious prosecution, to maintain trust in the justice system. It uses a hypothetical scenario (likely analogous to the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement) where a defendant pleads guilty to protect co-conspirators from being charged in other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00000342.jpg
This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.
DOJ-OGR-00016238.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer' by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers the witness's personal background, including their birthplace (Missouri), childhood in Arizona, and education (University of Pennsylvania and University of Texas at Austin), culminating in their current profession as a psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00015537.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330 AJN). In it, both the prosecution and the defense agree to the authenticity of three government exhibits (11, 12, and 13), which are certified copies of birth certificates from the states of New York, Rhode Island, and Missouri. This agreement serves to enter these documents into evidence without the need for further authentication in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002328.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text argues that the jury selection process in White Plains systematically underrepresented Black and Hispanic individuals, thereby violating Ms. Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair cross-section. The argument relies on the three-part test established by the Supreme Court in Duren v. Missouri to demonstrate a prima facie violation.
DOJ-OGR-00002328(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, is a portion of a legal argument on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. It contends that her Sixth Amendment rights were violated due to the systematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the jury selected from White Plains. The document cites the three-part test established by the Supreme Court in *Duren v. Missouri* to support the claim of a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement.
DOJ-OGR-00002323.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Authorities) of a legal filing (Document 126) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists legal precedents (cases) and statutes cited in the brief, including Supreme Court cases like Duren v. Missouri and Second Circuit cases like United States v. Jackman. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002323.
DOJ-OGR-00002323(1).jpg
This document is page 'ii' (labeled Page 3 of 13 in the PDF) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (Cases) and Statutes cited elsewhere in the filing. The citations heavily reference cases involving jury selection and fair representation (e.g., Duren v. Missouri, Taylor v. Louisiana), suggesting the main document likely involves a motion regarding jury composition or selection.
DOJ-OGR-00016437.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination dated August 10, 2022. An unnamed witness, Annie's mother, testifies about Annie's background, stating she was born in Missouri and grew up there, in Florida, and in Arizona. The testimony focuses on the year 1995, during which the witness was a divorced single mother with a 'very limited income', working as a sales representative and living with Annie and a younger daughter.
DOJ-OGR-00013613.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer), conducted by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers the witness's background, including her birth in Missouri, upbringing in Arizona, and education at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Texas at Austin, culminating in her current profession as a psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg
This document is page 7 of 239 (internally numbered 'vi') from a legal filing, Document 204 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of cases, listing legal precedents with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The footer includes a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00002941.
DOJ-OGR-00017409.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. In the transcript, a speaker identified as Ms. Comey stipulates that several government exhibits (11 through 16) are true and correct certified copies of birth certificates. These certificates were reported to various government agencies in New York, Rhode Island, Missouri, Sacramento County (California), and Massachusetts.
DOJ-OGR-00002826.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (filed March 24, 2021) outlining 'Applicable Law' under the Sixth Amendment regarding jury selection. It details the requirements for establishing a 'fair cross-section' of the community in a jury pool, citing precedents such as *Taylor v. Louisiana* and *Duren v. Missouri*. The footer indicates this document was processed by the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019102.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or draft article in which the author defends a controversial 'metaphor' they previously made about a 'rape-in of legislators' wives.' The author compares this statement to satirical routines by comedians Louis C.K. and Lenny Bruce, arguing it was a 'pro-choice parable' not meant to be taken literally. The text then pivots to criticizing Republican politicians Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock for their comments on rape and pregnancy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity