Judiciary
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00018615.pdf
An email chain from October 27, 2020, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) submitting an application for a search warrant to Judge Wang. The correspondence includes a request from the court to flatten PDF attachments and a correction by the AUSA regarding an error where Judge Nathan was named instead of Judge Wang in the initial documents. An agent is noted as being available to swear out the warrant.
DOJ-OGR-00001296.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on February 8, 2021, regarding United States v. Robertson (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV). The court is reconsidering and granting Mr. Robertson's release to the La Pasada Halfway House due to trial delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the inability to hold in-person attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse. The court cites 18 U.S.C. ยง 3142(e) and strict conditions as the basis for assuring community safety and the defendant's appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00010142.jpg
This document is page 7 of Stephen Gillers' Curriculum Vitae, filed as Exhibit A-5859 in a legal case. It details his prior employment from 1968 to 1978, including roles at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and as a judicial clerk. It also lists selected testimonies he provided to legislative bodies regarding judicial nominations and legal reform acts between 1981 and 1988.
DOJ-OGR-00005273.jpg
This document is an email dated October 21, 2021, from reporter Pete Brush of Law360 to Judge Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of a coalition of reporters from various news outlets, Brush expresses support for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's arguments against secret jury selection and vetting in the upcoming trial of USA v. Maxwell. The email underscores the press corps' interest in maintaining transparency in the judicial process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019816.jpg
This document is page 328 from the endnotes of a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the ISBN and content) referencing sources related to the NSA, Edward Snowden, and terrorism investigations between 2013 and 2016. The page lists citations for chapters including 'Epilogue: The Snowden Effect', referencing articles from The Guardian, Reuters, NYT, and others regarding surveillance programs like XKeyscore and PRISM. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was included in a government production, possibly related to an investigation involving the author or the subject matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031483.jpg
This document is an email from a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031483) circulating a BBC news article regarding the aftermath of the July 15, 2016, failed coup in Turkey. The email includes high-profile legal and political recipients, including Reid Weingarten, who is identified in the article as a lawyer for Fethullah Gulen. The article details Gulen's fear of assassination, the Turkish government's demand for his extradition from Pennsylvania, and the subsequent political purge in Turkey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031475.jpg
This document is an email dated August 5, 2016, from Will Bohlen to a large group including Michael Keough and attorney Reid Weingarten. The email forwards the text of a Reuters article reporting on a press conference held by Fethullah Gulen's lawyers (including Weingarten) in Washington, where they argued against his extradition to Turkey following a coup attempt. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017207.jpg
This document appears to be a page (pg. 120) from a draft manuscript or book, likely written by a legal scholar or philosopher, evidenced by the 'WC' (Word Count) header. The text discusses the tension between national security and civil liberties, arguing that the judiciary is best suited to balance these interests during crises. It is marked with a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017207', indicating it was produced as part of a US House of Representatives Oversight Committee investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity