Northern District of Georgia
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00027959.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at USANYS reached out to the Associate Deputy Attorney General to discuss document and discovery requests related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically in light of the recent charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The ODAG official advised contacting SDFL directly as CVRA litigation had concluded and noted that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had conducted a significant document collection the previous year.
EFTA00022533.pdf
An email dated July 23, 2019, from an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The email requests a call to discuss gathering information potentially relevant to the SDNY case against Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding an anticipated motion by Epstein to dismiss the case based on the 2008 Southern District of Florida (S.D.Fla.) non-prosecution agreement. The sender references attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia (N.D.Ga.) handling Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) litigation who suggested the contact.
EFTA00020185.pdf
This document is a transcript of the initial court conference for United States v. Jeffrey Epstein held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. Key topics discussed include the scheduling of a bail hearing, the controversy surrounding the 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which the defense argues bars this prosecution, and the government's stance that the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York. The court also addresses Epstein's sex offender status, the recent search of his Manhattan townhouse, and sets a schedule for bail submissions and the next hearing on July 15, 2019.
EFTA00016136.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The letter requests extensive discovery materials including the specific identities of 'dozens of minor girls' and 'employees' mentioned in the indictment, flight logs ('use of Mr. Epstein's planes'), massage schedules, and visitor logs. The defense also requests 'Brady material' (exculpatory evidence), specifically seeking evidence to support defenses that Epstein believed victims were over 18, that victims deceived him about their age, and that payments were gifts rather than for sex acts.
EFTA00010542.pdf
This document is the United States Government's legal response to proposed remedies by victims (Petitioners) of Jeffrey Epstein following a court finding that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The government admits its communication with victims was insufficient but argues against the Petitioners' request to partially rescind the NPA, citing contract law, potential harm to other victims relying on the agreement, and separation of powers. Instead, the government proposes holding a public hearing for victim impact statements, arranging meetings between victims and DOJ representatives, and mandating additional training for prosecutors.
EFTA00009888.pdf
This document is an email header dated March 5, 2019. The sender and recipient are redacted. The subject line indicates a discussion regarding a 'call with USA of NDGA [United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia] re: Epstein'.
DOJ-OGR-00000163.tif
This document details legal proceedings related to Jeffrey Epstein. On February 21, 2019, a district court ruled that the government violated the CVRA by failing to inform victims about a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and misleading them about ongoing federal prosecution. Subsequently, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York indicted Epstein on July 2, 2019, for sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, covering alleged activities from 2002 to 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00001260.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense on March 23, 2021, arguing for bail. It proposes retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. as an independent monitor for Maxwell's and her spouse's assets, specifically including proceeds from the sale of her London home, to address the Court's flight risk concerns. The defense argues against the government's claims of 'lack of candor,' citing the harsh conditions (solitary confinement, suicide watch) Maxwell was under when questioned by Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
This is page 11 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues to The Court that the discussion should concern the scope of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), not its legality. He references a filing by Northern District of Georgia prosecutors (acting for Southern District of Florida) before Judge Marrah that supported the NPA's constitutionality and asserted Epstein fulfilled his obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00021491.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice report detailing the sources of information for an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein case. OPR gathered records from U.S. Attorney's Offices in Florida and Georgia, as well as public records from Florida law enforcement agencies. The investigation also involved extensive interviews with subjects, and over 60 witnesses, including former high-ranking DOJ officials like Mark Filip and Alice Fisher, and communications with attorneys for Epstein's victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021446.jpg
This legal document details the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein case concerning victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Following Epstein's death, a district court denied the victims' (petitioners') motion for remedies, such as rescinding the non-prosecution agreement, deeming the issue moot. The document also covers an appeal by a victim named Wild and the government's legal arguments that its CVRA obligations were not triggered because charges were never filed in the original district.
DOJ-OGR-00021206.jpg
This document details the involvement of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Marie C. Villafaña in the federal investigation of Epstein, which she took over in 2006. It outlines her role in all aspects of the investigation, including negotiating and signing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) under the direction of superiors like Acosta. The text also covers her subsequent role as co-counsel for the USAO in the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) litigation brought by Epstein's victims, a role she held until the office was recused in February 2019, shortly before she left the USAO in August 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00003208.jpg
This document details the professional background of AUSA Ann Marie C. Villafaña, focusing on her role as the lead prosecutor in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation starting in 2006. It clarifies that while Alexander Acosta made the decision to use a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), Villafaña was the primary negotiator with Epstein's counsel and drafted the agreement. The text also outlines the timeline of the investigation, the subsequent CVRA litigation, and the eventual finding of government misconduct in 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00002786.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 171) from March 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing for bail release conditions. The defense proposes appointing retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. to monitor Maxwell's and her spouse's assets, specifically including proceeds from the sale of her London home. The text counters government arguments regarding Maxwell's 'lack of candor' by noting she was questioned by Pretrial Services while under extreme conditions including solitary confinement and suicide watch.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031408.jpg
This document, seemingly a printout of a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, details the reassignment of the Epstein case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. Pak following a ruling by Judge Kenneth Marra. The article highlights the findings of the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation, noting that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta broke the law by concealing a plea deal from victims, granting Epstein and accomplices immunity despite a ready 53-page federal indictment. It describes how prosecutors misled victims into believing an FBI investigation was ongoing when it had been secretly closed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity