Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ambassador Oren

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
2
Events
3
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the author
Supporter
5
1
View
person Dean
Commentator subject
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2012-04-02 N/A Disruption of Ambassador Oren's speech Irvine (Auditorium) View
2004-02-12 N/A Disruption of Ambassador Oren's speech by the Muslim Student Union. University Campus View
2004-02-12 N/A Disruption of Ambassador Oren's speech by students. University of California ca... View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017225.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of House Oversight documents) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal and ethical implications of the 'Irvine Ten' case, where students were prosecuted for disrupting a speech by Ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California. The author argues that prosecuting the students was necessary to protect First Amendment rights and the open marketplace of ideas, criticizing the ACLU's stance on the matter.

Manuscript page / evidence document (house oversight committee)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017224.jpg

This page, stamped with House Oversight markings, discusses a controversy at Irvine (UC Irvine) regarding the disruption of a speech by Ambassador Oren by Muslim Union students (likely the 'Irvine 11' incident). The text critiques ACLU leaders Chuck Anderson and Hector Villagro for signing a letter that failed to condemn the censorship, contrasting their stance with Dean Chemerinsky, who argued the disruption was not protected free speech. The author argues that failing to prosecute or discipline the students encourages further censorship of pro-Israel speakers.

Memo / opinion piece / report page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search