February 12, 2004
Disruption of Ambassador Oren's speech by students.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambassador Oren | person | 4 | View Entity |
| The Irvine Ten | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Anti-Israel groups | person | 0 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017225.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of House Oversight documents) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal and ethical implications of the 'Irvine Ten' case, where students were prosecuted for disrupting a speech by Ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California. The author argues that prosecuting the students was necessary to protect First Amendment rights and the open marketplace of ideas, criticizing the ACLU's stance on the matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event