Florida Department of Law Enforcement
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Regulatory |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | Investigation | Florida Governor Ron DeSantis directed the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to open an inves... | Florida | View |
014.pdf
This document is a plea agreement and sentencing order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated June 30, 2008. Jeffrey Epstein pleads guilty to Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, receiving a sentence of 18 months in county detention followed by 12 months of community control. The order specifies strict conditions including house arrest at 358 El Brillo Way, sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and a work-release arrangement allowing him to work at the 'Florida Science Foundation' in West Palm Beach.
016-01.pdf
This document is a transcript of a plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein held in June 2008 in Palm Beach County Court. Epstein pleads guilty to state charges involving solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor, agreeing to an 18-month jail sentence followed by community control (probation). The transcript details the specific conditions of his release, including residency at his Palm Beach home, work release at his own 'Florida Science Foundation' (located in the same building as his attorney), and strict prohibitions on contacting victims or minors.
EFTA00034376.pdf
An email chain from August 12, 2019 (two days after Epstein's death), in which an Executive Assistant forwards a request for information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The original request was sent by a Certified Law Enforcement Analyst from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FORTS Registration Compliance Unit) following a phone conversation.
EFTA00023059.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via NPA and failing to ensure victims were notified, he did not commit professional misconduct as defined by clear and unambiguous standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the CVRA litigation by victims, and the subsequent fallout leading to Acosta's resignation and Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
EFTA00013359.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised "poor judgment" in resolving the case via the NPA and failing to ensure victims were properly notified, he and his staff did not commit professional misconduct as defined by DOJ standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the secret negotiations, the subsequent violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and the eventual fallout leading to Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00002537.jpg
This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021236.jpg
This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report analyzing the decision to resolve a federal investigation against Epstein with a state plea deal. It details the rationale behind the decision, citing concerns about the case's viability and state jurisdiction, and specifically recounts communications from June and July 2007 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) and Epstein's defense team regarding the proposed state resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00021215.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive tactics used by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, including a threat by attorney Alan Dershowitz to 'destroy' witnesses. It also explains the Florida State Attorney's Office's decision to present the case to a grand jury, citing a conflict of interest involving prosecutor Krischer's husband and Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger, as well as the complexities of the case and the victim-witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00021183.jpg
This document is a page from a report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concerning its investigation into the conduct of Department of Justice attorneys in the Epstein case. The OPR outlines the scope and limitations of its investigation, noting it lacks jurisdiction over state officials and that the significant passage of time (approx. 12 years) affected witness recollections. The report's analysis relied heavily on contemporaneous emails and communications from the 2006-2008 period to evaluate the attorneys' actions based on the information available to them at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00003217.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive legal tactics employed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, including attorney Alan Dershowitz threatening a prosecutor to destroy witnesses. It also outlines the State Attorney's Office's rationale for taking the case to a grand jury, citing the complexity of the case and the problematic possibility that Epstein's minor victims could have been prosecuted for prostitution under the existing state law.
DOJ-OGR-00003185.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concerning its investigation into the conduct of Department of Justice attorneys in the Epstein case. The report outlines OPR's analytical framework, noting that its investigation occurred roughly 12 years after the original events and focused on professional misconduct based on information known to the attorneys at the time, prior to Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea. The investigation was significantly aided by contemporaneous records, such as emails between prosecutors and defense counsel, due to witnesses' faded memories over time.
DOJ-OGR-00025375.jpg
This is a letter dated August 12, 2019, from a Criminal Justice Information Consultant at the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). The letter is a formal request for documentation from an unspecified facility to update the official status of Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054), a registered sexual offender in Florida, to deceased.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017811.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit (House Oversight). It investigates how the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, under Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, allowed Jeffrey Epstein to participate in a work release program despite agency rules prohibiting sex offenders from doing so. Spokeswoman Therese Barbera defended the decision via email but refused to account for money Epstein paid the office for private details.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017597.jpg
This document contains an email correspondence sent to a reporter at the St. Augustine Record. The writer makes conspiratorial allegations linking a woman named Ms. Simms and the Horton family to a 2007 murder, child exploitation, and terror financing. The email also discusses legal proceedings involving FDLE agent Rusty Rogers and diverges into theories about 9/11, the DHS, and the National Science Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015009.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent to a journalist at the St. Augustine Record by an unidentified individual making serious allegations. The author claims their son was murdered in 2007 by the parents of an IBM employee and alleges a conspiracy involving child exploitation, terror financing, and government corruption. The text references litigation involving FDLE Agent Rusty Rogers, discusses the 9/11 attacks, and connects various government figures (Jeh Johnson, France Cordova) to a broader conspiratorial narrative.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022211.jpg
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News (reprinted from the Miami Herald) details how federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 to bowing to pressure from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by Kenneth Starr, regarding the non-prosecution agreement and victim notifications. It highlights the disparity between Epstein's lenient treatment—including work release and a private jail section—and the severity of his crimes involving dozens of underage girls. The document also references the 2008 sentencing hearing, the FBI's unfiled 2007 indictment, and the frustrations of local law enforcement officers like Detective Joseph Recarey.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity