This page is an extract from a legal brief or filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to the Epstein investigation). It cites a Minnesota Law Review article discussing the limitations of victims' rights in the U.S. compared to other jurisdictions, specifically noting that U.S. victims generally lack the power to challenge prosecutorial discretion (decisions not to prosecute). The document includes extensive footnotes citing various examples of enforcement discretion and budget limitations in contexts like tax law and marijuana enforcement.
This document is a presentation slide or financial exhibit detailing the estimated costs for a 10 mgd (million gallons per day) desalination plant. It itemizes construction costs totaling $128.4 million and adds percentage-based soft costs (contingency, engineering, etc.) for a total conceptual cost of $160.5 million. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be page 6 of a manuscript for a book titled 'Future Science' (edited by Max Brockman, forthcoming 2011). The text discusses the ethics and efficacy of 'shaming' as a tool for behavior modification, contrasting state-imposed shaming (criticized by Martha Nussbaum) with community-led shaming (citing examples in Leicester, Santa Fe, and Vancouver). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity