Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional employment membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potentially defense counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel. | Denver, CO (implied by sign... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009099.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the 'Voir Dire' (jury selection) proceedings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal teams present for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus Sternheim and Stabile).
DOJ-OGR-00009066.jpg
This document is a signature page from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated February 24, 2022. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.
DOJ-OGR-00009002.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2022. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00009001.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 5 of 5) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated January 13, 2022, and filed on February 24, 2022. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, and is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. The document also indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.
DOJ-OGR-00008960.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing from February 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense team, including attorneys Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, and Sternheim, is requesting the court to vacate Maxwell's conviction, dismiss the S2 Indictment, and enter a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 based on insufficient government proof.
DOJ-OGR-00008925.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00019806.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020. It lists various filings including letters, motions, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery, protective orders, and conditions of confinement, as well as a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell. The entries document the denial of certain motions by the defendant and the scheduling of future disclosures and status updates.
DOJ-OGR-00019805.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between July 30, 2020, and August 18, 2020. It includes a detailed ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders and privacy of witnesses, citing it as 'unprecedented' and 'too broad.' The docket entries list various filings, including motions for discovery disclosure by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition responses from the Government (Alex Rossmiller).
DOJ-OGR-00019803.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from July 13 to July 27, 2020. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the court's decision to grant the government's motion to detain her pending trial, the setting of discovery deadlines, and various motions and orders related to attorney appearances and extrajudicial statements. The document outlines the initial procedural steps in the case following her arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00019802.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering dates from July 8 to July 13, 2020, regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details administrative motions for attorney appearances (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the filing of a superseding indictment, and specific logistical orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, including COVID-19 protocols and public access via telephone.
DOJ-OGR-00019783.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet page from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also lists a series of letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a Brady disclosure order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019782.jpg
This is a page from the docket of a court case involving the USA and defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from August 20, 2020, to September 8, 2020. It lists various legal actions including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding protective orders and redactions, and two Memorandum Opinions and Orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying certain requests by the defendant. The document also notes a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell regarding one of the Memorandum Opinions.
DOJ-OGR-00019781.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019779.jpg
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date for July 2021. The docket also records various motions and orders concerning legal representation, discovery schedules, and rules of conduct for the parties involved.
DOJ-OGR-00019778.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8-13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment, notices of appearance for Maxwell's attorneys, and memoranda regarding her detention. A significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules Maxwell's remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, and outlines procedures for public and media access during the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00019773.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet for the case of USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her extensive legal team, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019771.jpg
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated March 24, 2021. It confirms that the certified indexed record regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal was transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. The notice lists the attorneys for both the defense and the prosecution who received electronic notification of this action.
DOJ-OGR-00019757.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It logs the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the placement of several sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim for the defense. The docket details a series of legal correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a judge's order regarding Brady disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00019756.jpg
This page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell lists legal filings and orders between August 20 and September 8, 2020. Key entries include memoranda and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions regarding victim disclosure and prison conditions, as well as a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019755.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58). It details legal maneuvers regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders between July and August 2020, including a ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a defense request deemed 'unprecedented' and 'too broad' regarding witness privacy. The docket lists filings by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition by Assistant US Attorney Alex Rossmiller.
DOJ-OGR-00019752.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 7 of 24) from July 2020 regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural events including the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear (Pro Hac Vice), and a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the logistics for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The document also lists the appearances of attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00019747.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant, Judge Alison J. Nathan as the presiding judge, and lists the five attorneys representing Maxwell. It also provides the contact information and law firm affiliations for each attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00019728.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It details the transmission of appeal notices, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim, and a series of letters between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding disclosure delays and investigative files. The log concludes with Judge Nathan issuing an order confirming the government's Brady disclosure obligations pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act.
DOJ-OGR-00019724.jpg
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include her arraignment on July 14, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody. The docket also records subsequent orders and motions concerning discovery deadlines, a defense motion to limit extrajudicial statements (which was denied), and proposed protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-29 | Paid | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | United States Dis... | $75.00 | Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance | View |
Response to the Governments October 7, 2020 letter
Defense response to the government's Oct 7 letter.
Impediments to defense preparation for Ms. Maxwell
A letter from defense counsel to the judge complaining that the BOP and MDC are preventing Ms. Maxwell from properly reviewing legal documents with her attorneys. It requests the court to intervene and order the BOP to allow counsel to pass papers to her during visits.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes regarding modification of protective order.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Letter dated 8/17/2020 filed.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order.
Submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
The document is a formal submission from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
CC of submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
A carbon copy of the document was sent via email to the Counsel of Record.
Disclosure of sealed materials in a legal case
A letter arguing that Ms. Maxwell should be permitted to disclose sealed materials to judicial officers, refuting claims that it would compromise grand jury secrecy.
Disclosure of sealed judicial documents
A letter arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for the limited disclosure of sealed materials to judicial officers. It refutes the argument that such a disclosure would compromise grand jury secrecy and asserts that the government has not provided a valid reason to withhold the information.
Disclosure of sealed judicial documents
A letter arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for the limited disclosure of sealed materials to judicial officers. It refutes the argument that such a disclosure would compromise grand jury secrecy and asserts that the government has not provided a valid reason to withhold the information.
No Subject
The document indicates it was carbon copied (CC'd) to the Counsel of Record via email.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by defense.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell seeking permission to exceed the standard page limit for a letter motion.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell requesting to exceed the page limit for a submission.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion requesting permission to file a longer-than-standard motion.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural request regarding page limits.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural request
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by defense counsel.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion regarding page limits.
Request to modify Protective Order
A letter motion requesting that the Court modify a Protective Order to allow Ms. Maxwell to refer to and file certain material under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
DOJ response denying defense counsel's request to use criminal discovery materials (Unsealing Materials) for civil litigation purposes, citing Protective Order restrictions.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Denial of request to use criminal discovery materials in civil litigation based on Protective Order and ongoing grand jury investigation.
Request to use discovery materials
Request to use Bates Nos. SDNY_GM_00000834 through SDNY_GM_00000962 to litigate a civil lawsuit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity