Counsel of record
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawrence A. Vogelman
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
court reporter
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal procedure | Designation of material to counsel of record within thirty (30) days after notice by the court re... | N/A | View |
| 2021-08-19 | N/A | Filing of Parties' Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule (ECF No. 40) | Court Docket (ECF) | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell | Remote (Video/Telephonic) | View |
| 2019-11-21 | N/A | Status conference held by Magistrate Freeman. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001762.jpg
This is the signature page (page 3 of 3) of a legal document submitted by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan on August 24, 2020. The document is part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and was officially filed on September 8, 2020. A copy was also sent via email to the Counsel of Record.
DOJ-OGR-00002397.jpg
This document outlines procedures for handling confidential information in a legal case. It details the timeline for designating material to counsel, the requirement for a Motion to Seal when filing confidential information with the Court, and the process for challenging designations of protected material, including "CONFIDENTIAL" and "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" classifications.
DOJ-OGR-00001811.jpg
This legal document is a letter from defense counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 23, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The letter complains that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) are severely hindering Ms. Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense by preventing counsel from reviewing documents with her effectively during legal visits. The defense requests the Court to order the BOP to allow them to pass legal papers to Ms. Maxwell for review and suggests a status conference to address these ongoing issues.
DOJ-OGR-00021974.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court order (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 16, 2019. It outlines protocols for handling 'Protected Materials' during discovery, specifically defining authorized personnel (legal staff, experts, jury consultants) who may access the data. It also establishes rules for showing materials to 'Fact Witnesses' without providing them copies, and mandates the destruction or return of materials to the Government upon the case's conclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00019199.jpg
This is a legal document from Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ, filed on July 2, 2020. The document is an order signed by United States Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, stating 'SO ORDERED.' and indicates that copies were sent to the counsel of record.
DOJ-OGR-00010600.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 9 of 68) of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document was filed on June 24, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It is signed by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and indicates that attachments were included and copies were sent to the Counsel of Record.
DOJ-OGR-00009540.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated February 24, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves as a response to a court order issued the same day, proposing that the defense will make limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order that was filed under a temporary seal.
DOJ-OGR-00008806.jpg
This legal document, dated January 5, 2022, is a filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It indicates that Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) suggests examining deliberating jurors to evaluate their conduct and is in the process of drafting a Rule 33 motion. The document lists several attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015658.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court order from the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, dated November 12, 2015. Judge Thomas Lynch rules that Defendant Alan Dershowitz may be present at a specific deposition, which will be overseen by a special master paid for by the defendant to rule on objections. The document is marked with the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015658.
No Subject
Carbon copy sent via Electronic Case Filing system
No Subject
Carbon copy sent via email
No Subject
Carbon copy sent via Electronic Case Filing system
No Subject
Carbon copy sent via email
Designation of deposition portions as CONFIDENTIAL
Notice designating specific portions of a deposition transcript as confidential.
Order Granting Motion to Withdraw
Order granting withdrawal of counsel, staying the case for 60 days, and directing mail to Maxwell at FCI Tallahassee.
cc: of legal filing
The document indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.
cc: of letter to Judge Nathan
The document indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.
CC of submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
A carbon copy of the document was sent via email to the Counsel of Record.
No Subject
The document indicates it was carbon copied (CC'd) to the Counsel of Record via email.
Certificate of Service
Service via CM/ECF system.
Omnibus Order Referring Motions to Magistrate Judge
Referral of motions [DE-16] and [DE-17] to Magistrate Judge Snow.
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
Filing of the stipulation document via CM/ECF system
Service of Motion
Service of Plaintiff's Agreed Motion for Further Extension of Time via e-mail transmission.
Service of Motion to Transfer
Service of the Motion to Transfer via e-mail transmission.
Order Denying Motion to Stay Disclosure Agreement
Denial of motion to stay; order to disclose documents on July 2, 2009.
Motion to Set Aside Order of Default
Argument that service was improper and default judgment was premature.
Notice of Striking Docket Entry
Service of legal document via CM/ECF to attached service list.
Order of Pretrial Procedures
Procedural order instructing parties on scheduling meetings, reports, and compliance with local rules.
Service of Motion to File Under Seal
Document served via U.S. Mail
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity