| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey MacDonald
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James Blackburn
|
Prosecutor witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Britt
|
Law enforcement escort |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Murders at the MacDonald house. | MacDonald house | View |
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or legal commentary (dated April 2, 2012), likely written by Alan Dershowitz given the context of Harvard Law and debating Scalia. It critiques the US legal system's handling of 'actual innocence' claims, specifically highlighting the Jeffrey MacDonald case and the Supreme Court's stance. The text includes a 2009 challenge from the author to Justice Antonin Scalia regarding the compatibility of his constitutional views on execution with Catholic doctrine.
This document appears to be a page from a legal review or oversight report concerning the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case ('Fatal Vision'). It details allegations of prosecutorial misconduct where prosecutor James Blackburn allegedly threatened witness Helena Stoeckley to suppress her confession of being present at the murder scene. It highlights that former Deputy Marshall Jim Britt came forward in 2005 to corroborate this suppression of evidence. NOTE: While the user requested 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein; it deals exclusively with the Jeffrey MacDonald case, though it bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document details post-trial discoveries in the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case, highlighting that government files contained suppressed lab notes confirming the presence of unmatched blonde wig hairs and black wool fibers at the crime scene. This physical evidence corroborates the confession of Helena Stoeckley—who claimed to be present with intruders wearing such items—undermining the prosecution's argument that no evidence of intruders existed. The text suggests that if the defense had known about this evidence, which was withheld, the trial's outcome would have been different.
Stoeckley admitted being in the home to acquire drugs; Blackburn threatened her with murder indictment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity