| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MacDonald
|
Spouses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Helena Stoeckley
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Murders at the MacDonald house. | MacDonald house | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Planning of Mortality Review for Jeffrey Epstein | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Mortality Review for inmate Epstien | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Mortality Review Planning | MCC New York | View |
| 2006-12-13 | Flight | Flight from TIST to HPN. | TIST to HPN | View |
| 2004-04-11 | N/A | Flight from PBI to JFK with large group including Glen Dubin, Eva Dubin, and GM (Ghislaine Maxwell). | PBI to JFK | View |
| 1979-01-01 | N/A | Actual trial of Jeffrey MacDonald | Court | View |
| 1970-02-17 | N/A | Murders of Colette, Kimberly, and Kristen MacDonald | MacDonald Home | View |
| 0019-01-01 | N/A | Narrator meets Jeffrey MacDonald at Terminal Island Federal Prison | Terminal Island Federal Pri... | View |
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or legal commentary (dated April 2, 2012), likely written by Alan Dershowitz given the context of Harvard Law and debating Scalia. It critiques the US legal system's handling of 'actual innocence' claims, specifically highlighting the Jeffrey MacDonald case and the Supreme Court's stance. The text includes a 2009 challenge from the author to Justice Antonin Scalia regarding the compatibility of his constitutional views on execution with Catholic doctrine.
This document appears to be a page from a legal review or oversight report concerning the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case ('Fatal Vision'). It details allegations of prosecutorial misconduct where prosecutor James Blackburn allegedly threatened witness Helena Stoeckley to suppress her confession of being present at the murder scene. It highlights that former Deputy Marshall Jim Britt came forward in 2005 to corroborate this suppression of evidence. NOTE: While the user requested 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein; it deals exclusively with the Jeffrey MacDonald case, though it bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document details post-trial discoveries in the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case, highlighting that government files contained suppressed lab notes confirming the presence of unmatched blonde wig hairs and black wool fibers at the crime scene. This physical evidence corroborates the confession of Helena Stoeckley—who claimed to be present with intruders wearing such items—undermining the prosecution's argument that no evidence of intruders existed. The text suggests that if the defense had known about this evidence, which was withheld, the trial's outcome would have been different.
This document appears to be a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12) written by a lawyer (likely Alan Dershowitz, based on the style and provenance of the file) regarding the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case. The text critiques the suppression of scientific evidence in the case and recounts how the author, initially skeptical of MacDonald's innocence, became convinced to help him after a chance meeting at Terminal Island Federal Prison. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents, potentially related to the Epstein investigation where Dershowitz was a key figure.
MacDonald pleaded with the narrator to help him; narrator initially declined.
MacDonald introduced himself at Terminal Island prison and asked for 5 minutes to show documents.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity