Jane Doe No. 6

Person
Mentions
58
Relationships
4
Events
1
Documents
29

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
3
3
View
person Former Employer
Employment
1
1
View
organization AFF
Employee
1
1
View
organization AFF
Former employment
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2009-07-22 N/A Jane Doe No. 6 signed the declaration. Unknown View

019.pdf

This document is a consolidated court order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 14, 2009, covering multiple civil lawsuits (Jane Does, C.M.A., etc.) against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra requests the United States government provide its official position regarding Epstein's motion to stay these civil cases. Epstein argued that defending himself in these civil suits might violate his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the USAO and subject him to criminal prosecution.

Court order
2025-12-26

018.pdf

This document is a court order dated May 14, 2009, from the Southern District of Florida, consolidating eleven separate civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery and procedural motions. Judge Kenneth A. Marra designates 'Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein' as the lead case for filings and sets strict limits on depositions to prevent duplication, ruling that defendants and common witnesses may be deposed only once across all cases. The order aims to improve judicial economy and efficiency in handling the multiple lawsuits filed by various Jane Does and other plaintiffs.

Court order (civil)
2025-12-26

008.pdf

This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.

Legal filing (response to court order)
2025-12-26

006.pdf

This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.

Court order / legal ruling
2025-12-26
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
3
Total
3

Investigator Visit

From: Former Employer
To: Jane Doe No. 6

Employer informed Jane Doe No. 6 that an investigator had been asking personal questions about her.

Call/conversation
2009-07-09

Investigator visit

From: Former Employer
To: Jane Doe No. 6

Informed Jane Doe No. 6 that an investigator had been asking questions about her.

Call
2009-07-09

notification of investigator visit

From: Former Employer
To: Jane Doe No. 6

Employer informed Jane Doe No. 6 that an investigator had been asking questions about her.

Call/contact
2009-07-09

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity