This document is a consolidated court order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 14, 2009, covering multiple civil lawsuits (Jane Does, C.M.A., etc.) against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra requests the United States government provide its official position regarding Epstein's motion to stay these civil cases. Epstein argued that defending himself in these civil suits might violate his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the USAO and subject him to criminal prosecution.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in multiple civil lawsuits; moving for a stay of proceedings based on potential violation of his NPA.
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | Judge |
United States District Judge issuing the order.
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80119
|
| Jane Doe No. 3 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80232
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80380
|
| Jane Doe No. 5 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80381
|
| Jane Doe No. 6 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-80994
|
| Jane Doe No. 7 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-80993
|
| C.M.A. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-80811
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-80893
|
| Doe II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-80469
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-80591
|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-80656
|
| Kellen | Co-Defendant |
Mentioned in case title 'C.M.A. v. Epstein and Kellen'
|
| Ann Marie Villafana | Attorney/Recipient |
Listed in 'Copies furnished to' with USDOJ email address.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court issuing the order
|
|
| United States Attorney’s Office |
USAO; referenced regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA)
|
|
| United States Department of Justice |
Implied by email domain @usdoj.gov
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Chambers where the order was signed
|
"Epstein moves for a stay until the expiration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) with the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) because, he claims, the USAO has taken the position that he is violating the NPA by defending the civil actions filed against him."Source
"Therefore, he argues that he cannot defend the civil actions without subjecting himself to criminal prosecution."Source
"The Court would appreciate the governments position within 15 days if possible."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,534 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document