This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, documents sworn statements from two underage girls regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The first witness details being recruited by an individual named 'AH' to provide massages, which escalated over 15 visits into sexual assault, including forced intercourse and encounters involving Epstein's girlfriend, Nadia. The affidavit outlines payments made to the victims and recruiters and provides corroborating testimony from a second witness who also visited Epstein's house.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, signed by Det. Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006, details the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes a victim 'SG' engaging in controlled calls with recruiter Haley Robson, who confirmed payment structures ('the more you do, the more you get paid') and arranged meetings. The document also outlines police interviews with Robson, who admitted to recruiting girls and described her own recruitment by a woman named Molly at age 17.
This document is page 19 of a Probable Cause Affidavit filed by the Palm Beach Police Department on May 1, 2006. It details the sexual assault of a victim identified as 'ML' by Jeffrey Epstein, including specific descriptions of the assault and payments made to ML and her recruiter 'YL'. It also documents a police interview on January 9, 2006, with another victim, 'CL', who was recruited by Tatum Miller from Royal Palm Beach High School.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details sworn statements from two underage girls regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The primary witness describes being recruited by an individual known as 'AH' to provide massages to Epstein, which occurred approximately 15 times and escalated from masturbation to sexual intercourse. The affidavit specifies payments made to the witness, to 'AH' for recruitment, and mentions the involvement of Epstein's girlfriend, Nadia, in one of the encounters.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details allegations against a man named Epstein. It contains statements from two victims, including one identified as 'JS', who were recruited by Haley Robson to perform massages at Epstein's residence. The document describes instances of unwanted touching by Epstein during these massages, a payment of $200 to one victim, and the recruitment of students from Royal Palm Beach High School for these encounters.
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details the testimony of a victim, identified as ML, who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein during a massage at his residence. The document describes the assault in detail, including non-consensual touching and digital penetration, and mentions payments made to ML and to another individual, YL, who brought her there. The affidavit also notes the identification of a second victim, CL, who was recruited to work for Epstein at age fifteen by a high school friend.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, summarizes sworn statements from two underage girls. The girls detail being recruited from Royal Palm Beach High School to provide massages to Jeffrey Epstein, which escalated into sexual touching and assault. The document outlines payments made to the girls for their services and for recruiting other girls, and describes specific instances of sexual abuse by Epstein, including one involving his girlfriend, Nadia.
This legal document argues that a 2003 amendment to Section 3283, which extended a statute of limitations, was properly applied to Maxwell's case under the 'Landgraf' legal framework. It contends that since the original limitations period had not expired when Congress passed the amendment, the charges against Maxwell are timely. The document also cites evidence from a separate case (United States v. Rutigliano) showing that an individual named Carolyn visited Epstein's residence through 2004, establishing a relevant timeline.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is ruling on defense objections to specific paragraphs (79 and 81) of a report. The judge discusses Virginia's testimony regarding interactions at Epstein's properties, specifically noting that trial evidence disproved claims that Virginia was unaware of other victims. The judge overrules an objection regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's responsibility for sexualized massages performed by individuals brought by a woman named Carolyn, concluding that Maxwell's recruitment of Virginia set the broader scheme in motion.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is ruling on objections to a report (likely a Presentence Investigation Report). The judge overrules the defendant's objections, citing credible testimony from witnesses Annie, Jane, Kate, and Mr. Alessi to establish that the defendant personally recruited Virginia (a minor) for sexualized massages with Epstein. The ruling also affirms that the defendant used monetary incentives to have Virginia recruit 14-year-old Carolyn, who subsequently witnessed sexual acts at Epstein's residence.
This document is a section of a report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) analyzing prosecutor Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. OPR criticizes Acosta's decision to prematurely end the investigation and accept a lenient 18-month sentence, forgoing the pursuit of crucial computer evidence. The report also notes OPR's inability to determine the basis for an earlier two-year sentence proposal, highlighting a lack of clarity and justification in the prosecution's strategy.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on Espinosa's recollection of booking hotels in Miami for a woman (implied to be Ghislaine) and confirms that Ghislaine dated and was in a relationship with a man named Ted Waitt in the 2000s. A question about whether the woman stayed at 'Epstein's residence' was asked, but an objection to it was sustained by the court.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between her current testimony and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding her visits to Epstein's residence. Specifically, she is questioned about whether it was Sarah or Maxwell who greeted her on her second visit and Sarah's role in scheduling massages.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a 2007 statement Carolyn made to the FBI regarding a returned phone call from Jeffrey Epstein, which she clarifies may not have been from him personally. The testimony also establishes that Carolyn made a second visit to meet Epstein, during which her boyfriend Sean drove her and waited in the car while she sat in the kitchen talking to a chef.
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on a statement Carolyn made to the FBI in 2007, where she reported seeing an older woman with an unknown accent at Epstein's residence. Carolyn confirms she made the statement and describes the day the FBI came to her home for the interview as a 'bad day'.
This document is a transcript of direct examination testimony from a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Carolyn testifies that she has not spoken to her ex-boyfriend, Sean, since their breakup regarding Epstein or her testimony. She confirms that she was interviewed by the FBI in 2007, where she identified an older woman with short black hair and an accent (Maxwell) at Epstein's residence during a visit with Virginia.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details an interview conducted on November 21, 2005, with former Epstein employees Juan and Maria Alessi. In the presence of their attorney and an Assistant State Attorney, they described their duties and observations, including the frequent arrival of young girls (appearing 16-17 years old) for massages. Juan Alessi specifically noted finding and cleaning sex toys (a vibrator and rubber penis) in the sink after these sessions and dealing with Epstein's girlfriend, Ms. Maxwell.
This document is a page from a Palm Beach Police Department affidavit detailing a witness statement regarding sexual activities at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The witness, who began visiting at age sixteen, describes a routine involving massages, sexual acts with Epstein, and paid sexual encounters with an associate named Nada Marcinkova while Epstein watched.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report dated September 1, 2006. Jeffrey Epstein reported a theft from his home office, stating he set up a spy camera to catch a thief stealing cash from a briefcase. He identified the suspect on video as his former houseman, Juan P. Alessi, based on his physical build and specific footwear. Additionally, Epstein reported a Glock 9mm handgun missing from a bookcase.
This document is a faxed printout of a news article describing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the police chief's frustration with the lenient plea deal and initial indictment, the involvement of high-profile lawyers like Kenneth Starr, and Epstein's claims of anti-Semitism. The text also describes Epstein's home environment, possession of firearms (Glock), and lists several female associates including Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen.
A 2007 Palm Beach Post editorial faxed to the State Attorney's office in 2008, criticizing the potential leniency of the judicial system toward Jeffrey Epstein. The article outlines the allegations involving underage girls, the involvement of high-profile defense attorneys like Dershowitz and Starr, and the controversial decision by State Attorney Barry Krischer to send the case to a grand jury rather than filing charges directly. It expresses concern that Epstein's wealth is buying him a favorable plea deal.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on Espinosa booking hotels for Ghislaine Maxwell in Miami during the 2000s, establishing that Maxwell did not always stay at Jeffrey Epstein's residence when in Florida. The testimony also identifies Ted Waitt as a man Maxwell dated and eventually became a couple with during that time period.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony confirms that Sophie Biddle was a professional masseuse used by Jeffrey Epstein and that the witness also received a massage from her. The witness details visiting Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street in New York to meet Ghislaine Maxwell for work-related errands and describes Maxwell moving residences from the Upper East Side to 65th Street.
This police report documents interviews with former Epstein employees Juan and Maria Alessi, conducted on November 21, 2005, regarding their employment and observations at Epstein's Palm Beach residence. The Alessis described their duties, the frequent visits of young female masseuses (estimated by Mr. Alessi to be as young as 16 or 17), and specific details regarding massage preparations and the cleaning of sex toys.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated February 17, 2006, details a search of Jeffrey Epstein's residence and vehicles conducted on November 17, 2005. Officers seized photographs, DVDs, and VCR tapes from the home. A key finding was a Thrifty car rental agreement in the name of Johanna Sjoberg inside Epstein's Chevy Suburban, suggesting a connection between the two.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity