| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Amber
|
Publisher subject |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Barton Gellman
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JOHN POMFRET
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GLENN TIFFERT
|
Author platform |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | Washington Post publishes PRISM scoop based on anonymous Snowden leak. | N/A | View |
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | Washington Post published the PRISM scoop anonymously. | N/A | View |
| 2013-06-05 | N/A | Washington Post publishes PRISM story. | Washington | View |
| 2008-11-05 | N/A | Publication of election newspapers (New York Times, etc.) following the US Presidential election. | USA | View |
| 1971-01-01 | N/A | Release and publication of the Pentagon Papers. | USA | View |
This document is page 3 of a printed Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It contains a statement from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, defending the non-prosecution agreement/plea deal as 'fairly negotiated' and reviewed by senior DOJ officials, while asserting Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations for over 10 years.
A printout of a Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, reporting that the Justice Department has opened an internal investigation into potential 'professional misconduct' by attorneys who handled Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. The investigation was revealed in a letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd to Senator Ben Sasse.
This document is a page from a Washington Post article printout containing a statement from Martin G. Weinberg, an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg defends Epstein's plea deal, asserting it was fairly negotiated, rigorously reviewed by the Department of Justice, and that Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations including jail time and probation.
This document describes the controversy surrounding Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein case, noting that a 53-page indictment was shelved in favor of a lenient 2008 plea deal. It details a newly announced investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the matter and includes a statement from Senator Sasse emphasizing the need for justice for the victims.
This document is a printout of a Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The article reports that the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility opened an investigation into whether attorneys committed misconduct during the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's earlier sex abuse case. This investigation was disclosed in a letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd to Senator Ben Sasse.
This document is a page from a book (likely by James Patterson) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's access to Mar-a-Lago through Ghislaine Maxwell's friendship with Donald Trump. It describes an incident where Trump barred Epstein from the club after a member's daughter complained Epstein tried to get her to undress. It parallels this with the recruitment of Virginia Roberts, who was working at Mar-a-Lago when Maxwell approached her for massage services, leading to her abuse.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes legal underenforcement and systemic bias, specifically regarding police misconduct, sexual assault, and crimes against marginalized groups (sex workers, undocumented immigrants, LGBT individuals). It argues that professional relationships between prosecutors and police create conflicts of interest that prevent fair adjudication, citing various legal standards and academic works.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of criminal prosecution jurisdiction between state and federal levels, particularly regarding police misconduct and sexual assault. It argues that federal oversight is an imperfect backstop due to higher legal standards and political shifts, and highlights the lack of safeguards against unjustified decisions not to prosecute compared to the robust protections against improper charging. The text includes extensive footnotes citing legal cases, statutes, and articles related to police violence and civil rights enforcement.
An email sent on September 23, 2016, from Richard Kahn of HBRK Associates Inc. to Jeffrey E. (jeevacation@gmail.com). The email is marked as high importance and consists of a link to a Washington Post article predicting a victory for Donald Trump in the upcoming presidential election.
This document is page 15 of a reference list or bibliography from an academic paper, Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026535. The list (citations 17-28) includes works on evolutionary game theory, psychology, and economics. Notable authors cited include Martin Nowak (M.A. Nowak) and Steven Pinker (S. Pinker), both Harvard academics who have been associated with Jeffrey Epstein; Nowak specifically directed the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics which received Epstein funding.
This document is an opinion article by Kimberley Strassel dated May 10, 2018, discussing a conflict between the DOJ/FBI and the House Intelligence Committee regarding the disclosure of a top-secret intelligence source involved in the Trump campaign investigation. The text details Speaker Paul Ryan's support for Chairman Devin Nunes's subpoena and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's resistance to opening FBI files. The document appears to be part of a larger House Oversight production (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020819).
This document is page 198 of a House Oversight production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020657) titled 'About the Participants.' It lists biographical details for eleven individuals, primarily academics and policy experts specializing in political science, Asian studies, and US-China relations. The list includes scholars from major universities (Columbia, Harvard, GWU) and policy institutes (Hoover Institution, National Endowment for Democracy).
This document is page 119 of a House Oversight Committee report (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020578), specifically Section 7. It consists entirely of endnotes/bibliography citations from 2016-2018 (and one from 1993) focused on US-China relations, corporate bowing to Chinese censorship (Facebook, Apple, Marriott), and technology transfer concerns (Google, Tsinghua University). There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific network in this document; it appears to be part of a broader legislative inquiry into foreign influence or trade.
This document is a bibliography page (Section 7, page 117) from a House Oversight Committee report. It lists sources from 2015-2018 focusing on Chinese foreign influence, money laundering scandals involving Chinese banks (AgBank, China Construction Bank, ICBC), and political donations affecting US elections (specifically mentioning the Clinton Foundation and Terry McAuliffe). The text portion analyzes how the Chinese Communist Party leverages foreign corporations and joint ventures to legitimize its rule and enforce political compliance.
This document is page 116 of a House Oversight Committee report (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020575) containing a list of references (endnotes 19-30). The citations primarily focus on Chinese corporate influence in US politics, lobbying activities, and 'dark money' contributions involving entities like ZTE, HNA Group, Wanhua Chemical, and Alibaba. It references reporting from The Intercept, Washington Post, and Daily Beast regarding connections between Chinese entities and US political figures including Donald Trump, Gary Locke, Howard Dean, and Newt Gingrich.
This document is a bibliography page (page 56) from a House Oversight Committee report containing citations numbered 41 through 44. The citations reference articles from 2002 to 2018 regarding China, censorship, and the relationship between Chinese entities/students and United States universities. While part of a discovery batch that may relate to Epstein, this specific page contains no direct mention of him, focusing instead on academic and geopolitical references.
This document page contains a list of endnotes (citations 13-18) from a House Oversight Committee report. The citations reference news articles from 2017 and 2018 focusing on US-China relations, including real estate investments, trade war fears, and local cultural issues. While part of a larger document set (possibly related to investigations), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his specific financial dealings.
This document appears to be page 18 of a House Oversight Committee report or production, containing endnotes (citations 6-12). The text focuses on US-China relations, specifically Chinese influence operations, lobbying efforts in Washington DC, and foreign travel regulations. While the user identified this as Epstein-related, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their known associates; it strictly lists bibliographic sources regarding Chinese foreign policy and influence.
This document is a single page from a participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting held in 2011. It lists attendees alphabetically by surname (starting with 'I' and 'J'), detailing their full name, job title, organization, and country of origin. The list includes high-profile figures from global business, media, academia, and government, such as David Ignatius (Washington Post), Anshu Jain (Deutsche Bank), and Kate James (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017081).
This document is a page from the participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011, marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation (likely related to Epstein's network). The list includes high-profile individuals alphabetically from David E. Bloom to Scott Brison, featuring notable figures such as Google co-founder Sergey Brin, musician Bono, and Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger. It details their titles, organizations, and countries of origin.
This document appears to be a page from a news digest or email newsletter printed as part of a House Oversight production (ID: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016793). It contains snippets of news stories from approximately June 2019, specifically covering the passage of a $4.6 billion border spending bill by the House and the Supreme Court's decision to hear a case regarding the DACA/'Dreamers' program. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document is a page of footnotes from the Minnesota Law Review, citing various legal cases, statutes, and news reports regarding police misconduct, officer-involved shootings, and criminal justice policies. It references specific incidents like the shootings of Philando Castile and Walter Scott, as well as legislative acts like the Death in Custody Reporting Act.
An email chain from May 2013 between Tom Pritzker and Jeffrey Epstein. The conversation initiates with Pritzker forwarding a news alert regarding Penny Pritzker's $80 million income understatement, complaining about the situation ('deal w this bullshit'). Epstein responds warmly, noting it was 'nice to see you' and inviting him to 'come more often,' indicating a recent in-person meeting.
A 2015 briefing slide from Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs (authored by Francis J. Kelly) analyzing the geopolitical situation in Ukraine and Russia. It discusses the strategic goals of Moscow, the economic impact of sanctions on Russia, the lack of Western aid for Ukraine, and the expansion of Russian military activity into Syria. The document includes two maps detailing withdrawal lines and linguistic demographics in Ukraine and bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity