| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Amber
|
Publisher subject |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Barton Gellman
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JOHN POMFRET
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GLENN TIFFERT
|
Author platform |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | Washington Post publishes PRISM scoop based on anonymous Snowden leak. | N/A | View |
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | Washington Post published the PRISM scoop anonymously. | N/A | View |
| 2013-06-05 | N/A | Washington Post publishes PRISM story. | Washington | View |
| 2008-11-05 | N/A | Publication of election newspapers (New York Times, etc.) following the US Presidential election. | USA | View |
| 1971-01-01 | N/A | Release and publication of the Pentagon Papers. | USA | View |
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or expert report bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers. It lists his publications (items 122-139) between 2003 and 2006, covering topics such as legal ethics, judicial selection, and high-profile cases like Martha Stewart's trial and Supreme Court nominations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed in 2022 as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330), likely as an exhibit related to expert testimony or legal arguments.
This document is page 38 of a legal filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The government argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by the USAO-SDFL with Jeffrey Epstein did not bind other districts. It cites the November 2020 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, noting that while USAO-SDFL prosecutor Maria Villafaña consulted with DOJ Child Exploitation Chief Andrew Oosterbaan, this does not support the defendant's claim of a wider immunity promise.
This document is a heavily redacted email dated January 23, 2019, from a representative of the Washington Post to an unknown individual. The sender requests information and comment on an unspecified topic and provides a partial contact phone number. The identities of the sender and recipient, as well as the specific subject of the inquiry, are redacted.
This document is an email dated October 21, 2021, from reporter Pete Brush of Law360 to Judge Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of a coalition of reporters from various news outlets, Brush expresses support for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's arguments against secret jury selection and vetting in the upcoming trial of USA v. Maxwell. The email underscores the press corps' interest in maintaining transparency in the judicial process.
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 362) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 20, 2021. The text argues for public access to the jury selection process (voir dire) and juror questionnaires, citing numerous legal precedents including United States v. Shkreli and Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court. It asserts that First Amendment rights require these proceedings and documents to be presumptively open to the press and public.
This document is page 331 of a 'Selected Bibliography' from a book or report, likely produced on September 30, 2016, and stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The content lists journalistic sources regarding Edward Snowden, the NSA, and espionage, citing publications like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Vice. The footer filename 'Epst_9780451494566...' corresponds to the ISBN for the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, suggesting this document is related to the journalist Edward Jay Epstein rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 330 of a selected bibliography from a book, likely produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019818). The page lists various articles published between 2010 and 2015, primarily focusing on Edward Snowden, the NSA leaks, WikiLeaks, and cybersecurity. While the document bears a file name starting with 'Epst' (possibly referring to Epstein in a larger production batch), the text itself is entirely focused on the Snowden saga and intelligence leaks.
This document is page 327 from the 'Notes' section of a book, specifically 'How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the filename). It lists bibliographic citations for Chapters 27, 28, and 29, referencing interviews the author conducted with intelligence figures like Michael Hayden and Kucherena, as well as various news articles from 2013–2016 regarding Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the War on Terror. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely due to the author's name or subject matter relevance.
This document is page 324 containing endnotes from a book, identified via the ISBN in the footer (9780451494566) as 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein. The page lists sources for chapters dealing with the NSA, Edward Snowden, Booz Allen Hamilton, and Russian espionage. It includes citations of articles from the Washington Post and NYT, as well as interviews conducted by the author with intelligence figures like James Angleton. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation production.
This document is page 323 from the endnotes section of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN 9780451494566 in the footer). The content lists citations for Chapters 19 and 20, focusing on the history of the NSA, Edward Snowden's leaks, cyber warfare, and intelligence gathering. It includes references to interviews the author conducted with former NSA officials (including Michael Hayden) and citations from major publications like the Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, and The New York Times between 2009 and 2015. While the filename includes 'Epst', this refers to author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein; the document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document appears to be page 322 from the notes section of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer). It contains endnotes for Chapter 18, citing various news articles and interviews regarding intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA), Russian espionage, and Edward Snowden. The document has a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production for a congressional committee. Despite the filename containing 'Epst', the content relates to the author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 320 from a book (identified by ISBN as 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein), containing endnotes for pages 159-171. The text consists of citations for sources regarding Edward Snowden, espionage, the NSA, and Russian intelligence, dating primarily between 2012 and 2015. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely due to the author's surname matching Jeffrey Epstein or relevance to intelligence oversight.
This document is a page of endnotes (p. 318) from a book authored by Edward Jay Epstein, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets'. The notes provide citations for Chapter 14, 'The Crime Scene Investigation,' detailing sources related to Edward Snowden, the NSA, James Clapper, and comparisons to Lee Harvey Oswald. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019806', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 317 of a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename and content), containing endnotes for pages 121-129. The text lists bibliographic citations for various articles and reports primarily concerning Edward Snowden, the NSA surveillance leaks, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and government intelligence activities between 2011 and 2016. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019805', indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a page of endnotes (page 315) from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (ISBN 9780451494566), produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. The text provides citations for Chapters 11 and 12, detailing sources for events surrounding Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong, his time in the Moscow airport, and his interactions with Julian Assange and Sarah Harrison. It includes references to media articles from The Guardian, Newsweek, and Vanity Fair, and notes a $20,000 speaking fee paid to Snowden by the University of Arizona.
This document is page 309 from a book containing endnotes for Chapter 3 ('Contractor'). Based on the footer ISBN (9780451494566) and filename 'Epst_', the book is 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein. The content details sources for information regarding Edward Snowden's employment (Dell, Booz Allen), his time in Japan and India, his relationship with Lindsay Mills, and interviews with intelligence officials. While the filename includes 'Epst' (referring to author Edward Jay Epstein) and 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the content is strictly about Edward Snowden and intelligence leaks, not Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be page 302 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by author Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename prefix 'Epst'), stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The text analyzes the damage caused by Edward Snowden's 2013 intelligence leaks, specifically regarding the NSA's PRISM program and Department of Defense operations. It features quotes from Booz Allen Hamilton Vice-Chairman Michael McConnell stating that Snowden compromised more capability than any spy in U.S. history.
This document appears to be page 298 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the operational fallout of the Edward Snowden leaks, specifically how terrorist targets using platforms like Xbox Live, Twitter, and Facebook ceased using these methods ('went dark') after the PRISM program was revealed in June 2013. The text cites NSA officials Richard Ledgett and Admiral Rogers confirming that the leaks resulted in a loss of surveillance capabilities against groups planning attacks in Europe and the US.
This document is page 288 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename and header). The text discusses Edward Snowden's motivations, rejecting the idea that he destroyed data before going to Russia, and analyzing his transition from whistleblower to espionage suspect. It details his work at Booz Allen Hamilton in Hawaii and his contact with journalists Greenwald, Poitras, and Gellman. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence in a Congressional investigation.
This document is page 242 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename prefix 'Epst_' and content). It details Edward Snowden's time in Hong Kong, his communications with journalists Barton Gellman and The Guardian, and the intelligence community's assessment (via Michael Morell) of Snowden's vulnerability to Russian and Chinese intelligence. The page was submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee.
This document appears to be page 166 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets', likely included in a House Oversight production file (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019654). The text details Edward Snowden's time in the Moscow airport transit zone, the control exerted over him by the Russian FSB, and commentary from Russian officials and former KGB agents asserting that Snowden likely shared US intelligence with Russia. While the file name includes 'Epst' (possibly referring to Epstein), the text content is exclusively about the Snowden intelligence leak.
This document is page 136 from Edward Jay Epstein's book 'How America Lost Its Secrets,' bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It details the FBI's initial response to Edward Snowden's 2013 theft of NSA secrets, including tracking him to the Mira hotel in Hong Kong, freezing his assets, and forensic analysis of his workspace in Hawaii. The text highlights a lack of inter-agency communication, noting that the DIA was not informed until July 10 that Snowden had also stolen a 'staggering' number of military documents related to Cyber Command.
This document is page 122 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details the history of NSA domestic surveillance, the role of the FISA court, the impact of the 9/11 attacks and the Patriot Act, and Edward Snowden's 2013 disclosures regarding Verizon phone records. The filename suggests it is a printer proof used in a legal or congressional context.
This document is page 109 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer), which is part of a House Oversight Committee file. The text details Edward Snowden's time in Russia, his asylum, the risks taken by his associates like Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange, and his subsequent media appearances and financial earnings ($20,000 from TED). It critiques Snowden's transition from a technician to a media figure and his rhetoric regarding facing prison versus escaping to Russia.
This document is page 105 from a book (Chapter 12, titled 'Fugitive'), likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the footer filename and ISBN). The text details Edward Snowden's interactions with journalists Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and specifically Barton Gellman in May and June 2013. It describes Snowden's request for Gellman to insert an encrypted key into a Washington Post article to signal a foreign government for asylum, a request Gellman refused. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity