Thomson Reuters
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
JEE
|
Communication context |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028969.jpg
This document appears to be a fragment of an email chain or contact sheet bearing the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028969. The top section lists contact details for a Reuters News correspondent (with specific numbers redacted). The bottom section contains a legal confidentiality disclaimer asserting that the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs inquiries to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023414.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (97-116) from a legal filing related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text discusses legal claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) against Saudi financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank (SAMBA), and NCB, regarding allegations of material support provided to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. It references various international treaties regarding aviation safety and terrorist bombings, and discusses the 'mental state' required for banking services to constitute material support of terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023411.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal citation list related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It lists evidence sources including CIA reports, UN Monitoring Group reports, and U.S. Treasury press releases regarding the designation of various individuals (such as Wa'el Hamza Jelaidan and Yassin al Kadi) and organizations (Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Muwafaq Foundation) connected to Al Qaida financing and terrorism support. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023409.jpg
This document is page 49 of a legal brief or court opinion titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed via Westlaw. It discusses the legal necessity of jurisdictional discovery regarding 'Sovereign Defendants' and 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank), which claims to be an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The text concludes by requesting the reversal of a lower court's dismissal of certain defendants and includes detailed footnotes referencing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the 9/11 Commission Report, and CIA documents concerning Usama Bin Laden and Enaam Arnaout.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (sourced from Westlaw) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It argues for the reversal of dismissals for the Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent Society, and National Commercial Bank based on the precedent set in 'Doe v. Bin Laden' regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023405.jpg
This document is page 45 of a Westlaw printout concerning the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses New York legal precedents regarding 'duty of care,' 'negligent entrustment,' and 'material support' to third-party tortfeasors (criminals/terrorists). While the text focuses on 9/11 and gun safety cases, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was used in the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely as legal precedent to establish liability for financial institutions (financial angels) supporting Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404.jpg
This is a page from a legal document (Westlaw printout, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404) regarding the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It contains legal arguments requesting the court defer decision on TVPA (Torture Victim Protection Act) claims pending a Supreme Court decision, and argues that organizations (not just individuals) should be liable under the TVPA. It also argues that the lower court improperly dismissed negligence and intentional tort claims related to the 9/11 attacks. While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the visible text strictly concerns 9/11 litigation case law and corporate liability, likely included in the House Oversight files as legal precedent or research material.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023403.jpg
This document is page 43 of a legal opinion or brief from 2012 titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal liability of entities under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) for providing material support and financing to al-Qaeda. The text argues that the District Court erred in dismissing claims against banks (Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, National Commercial Bank) on the grounds that corporations cannot be sued as individuals under the TVPA, citing various precedents including 'Khulumani' and 'Mohamad v. Rajoub'. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023401.jpg
This document is page 41 of a Westlaw printout referencing the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It details international conventions and Security Council resolutions regarding the definition and financing of terrorism. While the text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, it bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023401', indicating it was included in a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as legal precedent or an exhibit regarding financial compliance or terrorism financing laws.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399.jpg
This document is page 39 of a legal brief or court opinion (Westlaw) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It discusses the legal liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for defendants who provided financial and material support to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, specifically noting funding provided in Sudan in the early 1990s. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399', suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to financial institutions involved in terrorist financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023393.jpg
This document is page 33 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It details the funding and recruitment mechanisms of al-Qaeda through charities like the IIRO and MWL, citing media reports from the 1990s and relationships involving Osama Bin Laden. The text focuses on the legal standard for inferring a defendant's 'mental state' (knowledge) regarding the funding of terrorism, likely serving as case law precedent in a House Oversight investigation (indicated by the Bates stamp).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It details allegations against financial institutions Dallah al Baraka, ABID Corp, and DMI Trust (and individual Kamel) regarding their long-term financial support of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, dating back to the early 1980s. The text describes money laundering, the maintenance of bank accounts for terrorist front organizations, and the facilitation of funds transfers to operatives in Europe and Sudan. The document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023387.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It argues that a lower district court erred in dismissing Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) claims against Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and others related to the financing of al-Qaeda. The text focuses on legal standards (Rule 8 and Rule 12), arguing the court applied an incorrectly heightened standard of scrutiny to the plaintiffs' pleadings regarding the defendants' intent and support for terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023386.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It discusses legal theories of primary and secondary liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for defendants accused of providing material support or financing to al-Qaeda. The document does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, but bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in a larger production of documents to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384.jpg
This document appears to be page 24 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the Second Circuit's review of a district court's dismissal of claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The text critiques the lower court for applying incorrect legal standards regarding 'material support' to al-Qaeda. While the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384' suggests this was part of a congressional investigation (possibly included in a larger production of documents), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023382.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation, specifically detailing the financial infrastructure of al-Qaeda. It describes the interconnections between Osama bin Laden, various financial institutions (Al Shamal, Faisal Islamic Bank, Tadamon, Al Rajhi Bank), and individuals designated as terrorists or sponsors. It notably discusses the discovery of the 'Golden Chain' document in Bosnia, which identified major financial benefactors of al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023377.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) detailing the origins of al-Qaeda. It describes how Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam established the organization from the infrastructure of the Afghan jihad, utilizing a financial network known as the 'Golden Chain' comprised of various Islamic charities. The text also outlines specific fatwas issued by Bin Laden between 1992 and 1998 declaring war on the United States. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content on this specific page relates entirely to terrorism financing and history, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023371.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from a legal appeal (cited 2012) concerning the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. The Plaintiffs-Appellants (victims' families) are appealing a district court's dismissal of claims against five defendants, including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and Saleh Abdullah Kamel, whom they allege knowingly provided material support to al-Qaeda. The text argues that the lower court applied improper pleading standards and misinterpreted statutes such as the Alien Tort Statute and the Anti-Terrorism Act. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023370.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing or opinion retrieved via Westlaw, related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It lists various US statutes (U.S.C.), state laws (PA, NY), and international resolutions (UN Security Council) cited in the case, along with their corresponding page numbers. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, possibly related to investigations into financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing, marked with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368. It lists various legal precedents and case citations, primarily focusing on litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sovereign immunity, and international liability (Alien Tort Statute). While the document is part of a collection likely reviewed by the House Oversight Committee (possibly related to an investigation involving Epstein or similar legal themes of jurisdiction/immunity), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023367.jpg
This document is page 7 of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief generated via Westlaw in 2019, likely related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee. While the user identifies this as Epstein-related, there are no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his immediate associates on this specific page; however, the inclusion of cases involving Deutsche Bank (implied by similar financial litigations) or UBS AG suggests this may be part of a larger file regarding financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023361.jpg
This document is a 2012 Appellate Brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It lists numerous attorneys representing the Plaintiffs-Appellants and includes a Corporate Disclosure Statement detailing the corporate structures and name changes of various entities involved, primarily related to Cantor Fitzgerald and BGC Partners. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023361), suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015495.jpg
This document is a page from Nautilus magazine (labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015495) discussing the efforts of the Coalition to Cure Calpain 3, a nonprofit founded by Wrubel in 2010 to fund research for a rare muscular dystrophy. It details the scientific work of researchers Spencer and Louis Kunkel, including a $260,000 grant provided to Spencer's lab, and discusses the pharmaceutical industry's interest in orphan diseases. While included in a House Oversight document dump presumably related to Epstein (who often funded scientific research), the text itself contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters correspondent David Ingram seeking comment from Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who subsequently forwarded it to Darren Indyke. The email includes an attachment titled 'katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf', and a significant portion of the correspondence between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025578.jpg
This document is page 28 of a Morgan Stanley research report titled 'North America Insight'. It contains 'Appendix B', which analyzes the valuation of alternative asset managers through two charts (Exhibits 48 and 49) tracking P/E ratios from November 2010 to November 2017. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025578', indicating it is part of a production for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity