| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-11-30 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Motion for Travel | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2009-06-26 | N/A | Motion Hearing to stay | Palm Beach County Court | View |
| 2009-06-26 | N/A | Court hearing on Motion to Stay regarding the release of the MPA and other documents. | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2009-06-10 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Motion to interview & Petition for Access | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2009-06-10 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding unsealing of records | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2009-05-29 | N/A | Court hearing for Case 502008CF009381AXXXMB (Procure Person Under 18 for Prostitution). | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
This document is an appeal by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein against a Magistrate's Order compelling him to produce discovery materials, including correspondence with prosecutors, tax returns, and passport/travel records. Epstein argues that producing these documents violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he still faces a real threat of federal prosecution outside the Southern District of Florida, despite his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing also details privacy concerns for third parties (alleged victims), claims attorney work-product privilege over files selected by his defense counsel, and argues that his offer to stipulate to a high net worth renders the production of his tax returns unnecessary.
This document is an archived page from the Palm Beach Daily News dated June 11, 2009, discussing the legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It features statements from attorney Edwards, representing three underage victims, and Deanna Shullman, representing the press, both arguing that the sealing of the plea agreement is unusual and violates public records rights in Florida. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013429', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
Argument regarding the stay of release of documents pending appeal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity