This document is an archived page from the Palm Beach Daily News dated June 11, 2009, discussing the legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It features statements from attorney Edwards, representing three underage victims, and Deanna Shullman, representing the press, both arguing that the sealing of the plea agreement is unusual and violates public records rights in Florida. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013429', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edwards | Attorney |
Brad Edwards (implied); represents three women claiming abuse by Epstein; arguing for unsealing documents.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Subject of the plea deal controversy; accused of procuring underage girls for sex.
|
| Judge Colbath | Judge |
Presiding judge in the courtroom mentioned regarding the sealing of documents.
|
| Deanna Shullman | Attorney |
Representing 'the Post' (media); arguing for public access to records.
|
| drogers | Reporter/Author |
Author of the article (signature at bottom).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach Daily News |
Publisher of the article.
|
|
| The Post |
Media organization represented by Deanna Shullman (likely Palm Beach Post).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by publication name.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction where public records laws are being cited.
|
|
|
Specific legal setting mentioned.
|
"Certainly it should be unsealed regardless. I mean this is a very unusual circumstance where a document like this would be sealed."Source
"None of the other criminal defendants in there (Judge Colbath's courtroom) had their plea bargains, plea agreements, their non-prosecution agreements, sealed."Source
"Edwards said his firm represents three women who claim they were procured for sex with Epstein when they were underage."Source
"Fortunately, the status quo is openness. So I think the judge has the idea that the initial closure was done without any adherence to those procedures but was inclined to give Mr. Epstein's lawyers additional time to prove that they should be sealed in accordance with these procedures"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,375 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document