| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ray Ormond
|
Professional subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeejitunes@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dan
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com (Likely Epstein)
|
Professional advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional medical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Inmate Epstein
|
Professional prison staff to inmate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
JEE
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Geoffrey Berman
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Audrey M. Weekes
|
Professional subordinate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Associate U.S. Attorney
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Other AUSA(s)
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Professional social |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient (USANYS)
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com; other redacted recipients
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient (USANYS)
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Berman
|
Professional subordinate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH NETBURN
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Sibling |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Benefactor recipient |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Editor
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of defense witness (sender's partner) and setup of massage table in courtroom. | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview at DARPA where a female head (Arathi) allegedly made inappropriate comments about a can... | DARPA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Learning trip on TECHNOLOGIES emerging from the region | Middle East (Israel, Emirat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential filming session mentioned by redacted sender ('I can film in 10 days'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Appearance on Fox and Friends to release information about a wall in New Mexico. | Fox and Friends (Media) | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Email exchange regarding the purchase of courtroom sketches. | View | |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Discussion regarding witness order for the upcoming trial (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). | Unknown | View |
| 2021-09-03 | N/A | End of out-of-office period for the sender | Office | View |
| 2021-07-29 | N/A | Meeting with redacted individual | Unknown (likely SDNY offices) | View |
| 2021-06-11 | N/A | Discovery of a photo of Trump and Ghislaine Maxwell on Steve Bannon's phone during a legal review. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-26 | N/A | Discussion regarding filing a Speedy Trial Act (STA) exclusion letter | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Review of physical evidence from the Epstein file | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Scheduling of a potential interview between a witness/subject and the NYPD/FBI Task Force. | Texas (Remote/Phone likely) | View |
| 2021-03-25 | N/A | Read receipt generated for email concerning a call about Epstein | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-19 | N/A | Call re: Epstein FOIA | Teleconference / Call | View |
| 2021-03-12 | N/A | Sender out of office | Office | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Accepted: Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Acceptance of a meeting or task related to Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-18 | N/A | Recipient office coordinates manual retrieval of document due to remote work schedule (25% capaci... | Office (implied SDFL) | View |
| 2020-11-03 | N/A | Phone call between sender and recipient referenced in the later email ('Per our call'). | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-30 | N/A | Call with DOJ regarding alternative locations/ways for victims to participate. | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-10-23 | N/A | Request for a conference call/meeting to discuss papers regarding the Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-11 | N/A | Internal discussion regarding the need to interview a female subject again based on an attached PDF. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-08-04 | N/A | Attempted physical handoff of thumb drive at office; drive left on bookshelf. | Office | View |
This document is an email dated March 18, 2020, sent by an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject is 'New Maxwell Lawsuit' and the body contains a link to a New York Times article about a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The names of the sender and recipients are redacted.
This document is an internal USANYS email chain discussing a New York Law Journal op-ed by Bruce Green and Rebecca Roiphe. The article criticizes Judge Richard Berman's decision to hold a hearing and allow victims to speak regarding the dismissal of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his suicide, arguing it violates procedural norms and the presumption of innocence. The email sender notes that Judge Berman addressed the article in court, pointing out that one of the authors is undisclosed counsel in a related civil case.
An internal email from August 2019 involving USANYS officials (Southern District of New York). The sender mentions having an 'Epstein conference before Berman' (likely U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman) and discusses coordination with another office that agreed to 'stand down' pending the conclusion of the USANYS investigation. This suggests jurisdictional de-confliction regarding the Epstein case.
This document is an email invitation for a Webex meeting dated March 10, 2021, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject of the meeting is 'Epstein/Maxwell FOIA', indicating a discussion regarding Freedom of Information Act requests related to the case.
This document is a redacted email exchange from December 2018 discussing the Miami Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series regarding Jeffrey Epstein. One participant asks if they can be 'open on this,' to which the respondent replies 'Yes. As of today. On the d/l for now,' suggesting a strategy of keeping their involvement or reaction quiet.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between Dr. Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco and prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The prosecutors contact Dr. Mehlman-Orozco to discuss her availability to testify as an expert witness in the upcoming trial of *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. They schedule a conference call for October 29, 2020, and Dr. Mehlman-Orozco provides her CV and fee schedule.
An email chain from October 27, 2020, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) submitting an application for a search warrant to Judge Wang. The correspondence includes a request from the court to flatten PDF attachments and a correction by the AUSA regarding an error where Judge Nathan was named instead of Judge Wang in the initial documents. An agent is noted as being available to swear out the warrant.
An email dated March 2, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient (implied to be an FBI contact). The email discusses a letter from 'Noel's counsel' requesting additional discovery and asks the recipient to check if the FBI currently possesses responsive notes or reports for items 1-13, clarifying that no new investigation is requested.
This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email includes two attachments related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case: a 'RTC' (likely Request to Charge) document and a verdict sheet, indicating trial preparation activities.
An email dated January 10, 2020, from the Public Affairs office of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) reporting on the viewership numbers (3.5 million) for the documentary 'Truth and Lies: Jeffrey Epstein' which aired the previous night. The email contains a link to a Critical Mention media report.
This document is a printed email header or calendar notification dated February 4, 2020. The sender and recipient are redacted. The subject line reads 'Accepted: Epstein', indicating the acceptance of a meeting or appointment related to the Epstein matter.
This document is an email dated September 3, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email concerns the sharing of an attached FBI interview report ('Fernandez_302.pdf') likely related to the Epstein investigation. The sender gives permission for the recipient to produce the document to 'the defense' but inquires about the existence of a protective order in the recipient's case.
This document is an email header dated December 3, 2019. The sender and recipient fields are redacted. The subject line refers to a 'Call with FCA (Epstein)', suggesting a discussion involving the Financial Conduct Authority concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The document bears the ID EFTA00018128.
An email dated January 29, 2020, sent by a redacted individual to a redacted group regarding an attached Excel analysis of Epstein trust documents. The sender explains that the file includes analysis of trusts from 2019 and details the structure of the spreadsheet tabs.
This document is an email dated January 29, 2020, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email discusses updating a 'sharing order application' (likely a Rule 6(e) application based on the filename) to include additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys. The sender asks colleagues to review the descriptions of these new materials.
A heavily redacted email document from January 16, 2020. The visible portion contains an email discussing a lawsuit filed by the Virgin Islands government against Jeffrey Epstein's estate and the '1953 Trust'. The lawsuit seeks to void allegedly fraudulent transfers of assets to the trust. The sender offers to provide the complaint and details to the recipient's team and executives.
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorney Jack Scarola. The email serves to notify Scarola of an order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that the rule applies to attorneys associated with a case, including attorneys for witnesses. The document includes a Bates number EFTA00018031.
This document is an email notification dated March 31, 2021, indicating the acceptance of a scheduled call. The call involves an individual from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and representatives Andy Tomback and Marc Weinstein, specifically noting their connection to the 'Epstein estate'.
This document is a redacted email dated May 9, 2019, from a Co-Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'Epstein', and the sender asks the recipient to stop by for a brief discussion.
An internal email dated November 16, 2019, between employees of the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The sender alerts colleagues to a New York Post article reporting that the jail guards assigned to Jeffrey Epstein at the MCC had been offered a plea deal but declined it.
An internal USANYS email dated November 13, 2019, circulating a New York Times excerpt. The excerpt details a female witness's recollection of Jeffrey Epstein, describing him initially as casual and interested in her education, followed by inappropriate physical contact during a movie.
This document is an email notification dated August 18, 2020, confirming the acceptance of a calendar invitation for a call. The subject of the call is explicitly stated as 'SDNY-ODAG Call (Epstein/Maxwell)', indicating high-level coordination between the Southern District of New York and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General regarding the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The sender and recipient names are redacted, though the recipient is identified as being part of USANYS.
This document is an email chain dated November 20, 2020, between Bobbi C. Sternheim (defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell) and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim sent an urgent request for a call regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The AUSA replied indicating they had missed a call and provided windows of availability.
This document is an email notification dated April 25, 2019, confirming the acceptance of a meeting invitation with the subject 'Meet re Epstein'. The identities of both the sender and the recipient have been redacted. The document includes a Bates stamp EFTA00017792 at the bottom.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-09 | Paid | Redacted Sender | Elizabeth Williams | $0.00 | Potential purchase of original courtroom sketch... | View |
| 2019-06-06 | Paid | Redacted Sender | jeeitunes@gmail.com | $0.00 | Discussion of a 'deal for the entire training' | View |
| 2017-08-24 | Paid | Redacted Sender | Unknown Buyer | $0.00 | Sender sold shares in a startup for a '10x' ret... | View |
| 2004-02-07 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Redacted Sender | $0.00 | Sender requests a 'financial arrangement' or pa... | View |
Status report indicating no inmates on Suicide Watch and Epstein on Psych Observation.
Two DVDs containing video content. One is labeled 'original', the other 'THE ADVENTURES OF [REDACTED]'.
Notification that Inmate Epstein is being taken off Psych Observation and needs an appropriate cellmate. Confirms no Suicide Watch or Psych Observation status.
Congratulating Brad on the Deutsche Bank win and asking about the settlement figure and the JP Morgan lawsuit.
Sender states they will not talk to reporters because it doesn't feel right. Mentions a friend was contacted by reporters claiming to write about 'notable people from the east' to get information about the sender. Notes Slovakian press is 'going crazy'.
Maintained close touch primarily by phone and email.
Expresses preference for originals; asks to confirm if attached images are her work.
Confirmation of work; asks if prints or originals are desired; mentions availability Thursday.
Inquiry about purchasing sketches of sender and partner (defense witness/massage table setup).
Forwarding the explanation regarding prisoner issues raised in court.
Forwarding the press inquiry with the comment 'Passing this on.'
Forwarding original request for comment.
Provided attachments of versions planned to file by 5. Noted paragraph on trial team's availability.
Acknowledged resolution of the issue.
Discussed agreement on a sealed letter and sending final language as FYI.
Stated availability generally around until 3.
Clarification that the document is a 2019 order recently unsealed where Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order.
Sender states they want to hear what lawyers say before agreeing to an interview and wants to ask questions. Offers availability Thursday 6am TX time, tomorrow 11am TX time, or Wednesday morning.
This is an automated read receipt indicating that a previous email with the subject 'Call with PAE re Epstein' was opened.
Asking for date and time that works for the recipient.
Forwarding previous email with 'FYI'.
FYI
Request to coordinate handoff of two drives (smaller one loaded that day, bigger one with full discovery copy) and password cover letter.
Confirmation of recipient joining the 'Maxwell team' as the 'law guy', scheduling an onboarding call, and sharing prosecution memos.
Character reference supporting bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity