An email thread from March 30, 2021, among DOJ officials discussing a Westlaw alert for a 'supposedly sealed order' related to Jeffrey Epstein and Boies Schiller. The thread clarifies that the document is actually a 2019 order recently unsealed in which Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. The participants express confusion initially about why a sealed order appeared public.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned in the email subject line regarding a 'Supposedly Sealed Order'.
|
| Judge Netburn | Judge |
Denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case in 2019.
|
| Redacted Sender (Top Email) | Government Official/Attorney |
Explains the context of the unsealed order to USANYS recipient.
|
| Redacted Sender (USANYS) | US Attorney's Office (SDNY) |
Asks 'Do you know what this is about?' regarding the Boies Schiller/Epstein order.
|
| Redacted Sender (USAGAN) | US Attorney's Office (Georgia Northern) |
Forwards Westlaw alert noting it is 'weird' that a sealed order is public.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (recipient/sender in thread).
|
|
| USAGAN |
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia (sender in thread).
|
|
| Boies Schiller |
Law firm mentioned in subject line (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP).
|
|
| Westlaw |
Legal research service used to send the alert.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (listed as Client ID).
|
|
| Thomson Reuters |
Parent company of Westlaw.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (1,624 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document