EFTA00019095.pdf

63.3 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 63.3 KB
Summary

An email thread from March 30, 2021, among DOJ officials discussing a Westlaw alert for a 'supposedly sealed order' related to Jeffrey Epstein and Boies Schiller. The thread clarifies that the document is actually a 2019 order recently unsealed in which Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. The participants express confusion initially about why a sealed order appeared public.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Mentioned in the email subject line regarding a 'Supposedly Sealed Order'.
Judge Netburn Judge
Denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case in 2019.
Redacted Sender (Top Email) Government Official/Attorney
Explains the context of the unsealed order to USANYS recipient.
Redacted Sender (USANYS) US Attorney's Office (SDNY)
Asks 'Do you know what this is about?' regarding the Boies Schiller/Epstein order.
Redacted Sender (USAGAN) US Attorney's Office (Georgia Northern)
Forwards Westlaw alert noting it is 'weird' that a sealed order is public.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (recipient/sender in thread).
USAGAN
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia (sender in thread).
Boies Schiller
Law firm mentioned in subject line (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP).
Westlaw
Legal research service used to send the alert.
DOJ
Department of Justice (listed as Client ID).
Thomson Reuters
Parent company of Westlaw.

Timeline (1 events)

2019
Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case.
Court (implied SDNY)

Relationships (1)

USANYS Staff Professional/Colleague USAGAN Staff
Exchanging emails regarding legal filings and Westlaw alerts.

Key Quotes (2)

"This is a 2019 order that was recently unsealed. We made an application to modify a protective order in a civil case, and Judge Netburn denied the application."
Source
EFTA00019095.pdf
Quote #1
"The order says it is sealed, but it's quite public, as you can see."
Source
EFTA00019095.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,624 characters)

From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted])"
<[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Boies Schiller--Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:34:50 +0000
This is a 2019 order that was recently unsealed. We made an application to modify a protective order in a civil
case, and Judge Netburn denied the application.
-----Original Message-----
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 10:21 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Boies Schiller--Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order
Do you know what this is about?
-----Original Message-----
From: [Redacted] (USAGAN) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 9:08 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: IN RE APPLICATION TO UNSEAL CIVIL DISCOVERY MATERIALS, USAO Reference No.
2018R01618.
This is weird to me. The order says it is sealed, but it's quite public, as you can see.
-----Original Message-----
From: Westlaw@westlaw.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 9:06 AM
To: [Redacted] (USAGAN) <[Redacted]>
Subject: IN RE APPLICATION TO UNSEAL CIVIL DISCOVERY MATERIALS, USAO Reference No.
2018R01618.
[Redacted] sent you content from Westlaw Edge.
Please see the attached file.
Item: IN RE APPLICATION TO UNSEAL CIVIL DISCOVERY MATERIALS, USAO Reference No.
2018R01618.
Citation: Slip Copy
Sent On: Tuesday, March 30, 2021
Sent By: [Redacted]
Client ID: DOJ
Note:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Westlaw © 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
EFTA00019095

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document