Judge Keenan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989-01-01 | Legal case | The Khashoggi case was written by Judge Keenan. The defendant was described as a person of extrao... | United States | View |
| 1989-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Khashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048, 1052 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1989-01-01 | N/A | Khashoggi case proceedings | United States Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001927.jpg
This is page 50 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020. The defense counsel is arguing for bail by citing legal precedents (Bodmer and Khashoggi) where foreign citizens with extradition concerns or significant wealth were granted bail. The lawyer argues that denying bail simply because France does not extradite citizens would effectively bar all French citizens from bail in the US.
DOJ-OGR-00001129.jpg
This document is page 33 of a legal filing (dated Dec 14, 2020) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that Maxwell is not a flight risk because she has executed waivers of extradition and obtained expert reports (specifically from U.K. barrister David Perry) concluding she could not successfully resist extradition from the U.K. or France. The text cites various legal precedents (Salvagno, Karni, Chen, Khashoggi) to support the validity of extradition waivers as conditions of release.
DOJ-OGR-00001054.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is arguing for bail for their client. The attorney cites two legal precedents, the Bodmer case (2004) and the Khashoggi case (1989), to counter the government's position. The argument focuses on the principle that a foreign national's home country's non-extradition policy should not automatically preclude them from being granted bail in the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00002005.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell should be granted bail conditions involving an extradition waiver, citing legal precedents (Salvagno, Karni, Chen, Khashoggi) where such waivers were accepted as assurances against flight. The document states Maxwell has obtained expert reports from French and UK experts (specifically David Perry regarding the UK) concluding that she would be unable to resist extradition back to the US if she fled to those countries after signing a waiver.
DOJ-OGR-00020047.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues on behalf of Ms. Maxwell by citing several past U.S. court cases where defendants waived extradition rights to demonstrate they were not a flight risk. It then introduces expert reports, specifically one from U.K. barrister David Perry, which conclude it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could successfully resist extradition from the U.K. or France back to the United States, further supporting the argument that she is not a flight risk.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity