This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is arguing for bail for their client. The attorney cites two legal precedents, the Bodmer case (2004) and the Khashoggi case (1989), to counter the government's position. The argument focuses on the principle that a foreign national's home country's non-extradition policy should not automatically preclude them from being granted bail in the United States.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Scheindlin | Judge |
Presided over the Bodmer case in 2004.
|
| Judge Keenan | Judge |
Wrote the decision in the Khashoggi case in 1989.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the nationality of the defendant in the Bodmer case and as a country that does not extradite its citizens.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the location of legal proceedings where bail is being considered for foreign citizens.
|
|
|
Used in a hypothetical example regarding bail for its citizens in the United States.
|
"if that becomes the test for bail, then no citizen of Switzerland can ever get bail in the United States."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,665 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document