| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Secret Service. | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-09 | Consultation and investigation | Consultation of the Department of Justice occurred before and after September 24, followed by con... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Document release | A memorandum was released by the DOJ/FBI, which led to public and congressional dissatisfaction a... | N/A | View |
| 2025-02-27 | Public announcement | The Department of Justice issued a press release announcing the declassification and release of f... | N/A | View |
This document is Page 2 of 4 of a FedEx invoice dated November 8, 2002. It is a blank 'Adjustment Request' form intended for the account holder (Account Number: 2292-0750-4) to fax back to FedEx if there are billing errors. The document bears 'CONFIDENTIAL' stamps and Bates numbers indicating it was part of evidence in SDNY and DOJ proceedings.
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing, specifically Document 124 in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It outlines the structure of the parent document, listing sections such as Introduction, Argument, and Conclusion with their corresponding page numbers. The page is marked with a Department of Justice Bates number, indicating its origin or handling within that agency.
This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, argues that an unnamed defendant, who is a French citizen, would be completely protected from extradition to the United States if she were to flee to France. The argument is supported by direct communication from the French Ministry of Justice, which confirmed France's inflexible principle of not extraditing its citizens outside the European Union, and is further bolstered by a legal precedent from the 2013 case, United States v. Cilins.
This document is page 84 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court is arguing that Maxwell poses a flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, foreign connections, lack of ties to the US, and the seriousness of the charges. The text notes that Maxwell's defense argues she did not flee after Epstein's arrest despite knowing she was under investigation.
This document is page 5 of a 34-page legal filing (Document 35 in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT), filed on April 24, 2020. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases cited within the main document, such as United States v. Payne and United States v. Pelullo. Each entry includes the full legal citation and the page number(s) where the case is referenced in the filing.
This document is the cover page for "Exhibit 5," titled "State Information." It is part of two legal proceedings, Case 22-1426 (filed 06/29/2023) and Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (filed 04/16/21). The page includes a Department of Justice Bates number, DOJ-OGR-00021521.
This document is the conclusion of a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report concerning the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prompted by a 2018 Miami Herald article, the OPR investigated the 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) orchestrated by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The report identifies five former federal prosecutors, including former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, as subjects of the investigation for their roles in negotiating and executing the controversial deal.
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the rights of a crime victim and the information they must be provided during an investigation. It specifies that victims must be informed of their rights under U.S. Code, available services, compensation programs, and the contact information for responsible officials. The document also details the notification requirements during the investigation and defines the subsequent prosecution stage.
This legal document details the FBI's victim notification procedures during the 2006 investigation into Epstein. It describes how, starting in August 2006, the FBI's Victim Specialist, directed by the case agent, used the Victim Notification System (VNS) to send letters to victims informing them of their CVRA rights and the case status. The document also notes the use of pamphlets, such as "Help for Victims of Crime," to explain that the U.S. Attorney's Office would be responsible for ensuring their rights were afforded after an indictment.
This legal document analyzes the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein in light of the Department of Justice's 'Ashcroft Memo,' which mandates charging the 'most serious readily provable charge.' It contrasts the federal indictment for sex trafficking prepared by prosecutor Villafaña, which carried a 168-210 month sentence, with the eventual plea deal of an 18-month sentence on state charges. The document also reveals internal disagreement, with prosecutors Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie perceiving risks in the federal case, while Villafaña and the CEOS Chief believed the charges were appropriate.
This legal document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea in late 2007, caused by a new strategy from his legal team to appeal to senior Department of Justice officials to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It chronicles communications between the USAO, the State Attorney's Office, and Epstein's attorneys, including Kenneth Starr and Jack Goldberger, regarding scheduling conflicts and Epstein's compliance with the agreement. Ultimately, these efforts delayed the plea hearing by months, with a final date set for January 4, 2008.
This is the conclusion page (page 22 internal, page 23 of PDF) of a legal filing submitted by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on September 16, 2020. The Government argues that Maxwell's appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or, alternatively, her motion to consolidate appeals should be denied.
This document is a page from a legal summation in a court case, filed on August 10, 2022. The speaker argues that memory is a constructive and fallible process, using Annie Farmer's incorrect recollection of an April 1996 date as an example. The speaker also defends the credibility of an expert, Dr. Loftus, by stating she has consulted for the Department of Justice, FBI, and Secret Service, countering the implication that she is solely a defense witness.
This document is page 113 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn testifies that Sarah Kellen called her on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, offering $500-$600 to take nude photographs of her at the Palm Beach house. Carolyn also describes massage appointments where she would undress and massage Epstein for approximately 45 minutes.
This document is a page from a phone log (Call Detail Record) associated with a DOJ investigation (DOJ-OGR-00031261) covering the period of Sept 21, 2005 to Oct 4, 2005. It lists incoming and outgoing calls involving Jeffrey Epstein's numbers (mostly 561 area code/Palm Beach) and various individuals including Courtney Wild, Tatum Miller, and Dr. Perry Bard. The document contains handwritten annotations marking specific dates with a symbol (likely 'Delta here' or 'A here') and includes significant redactions of other callers' identities.
This document is a court docket entry dated January 12, 2021, recording the transmission of the appeal record to the U.S. Court of Appeals (USCA). It specifies that the certified indexed record regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's Notice of Appeal (entry 113) has been electronically transmitted.
This document is page 35 of 68 from a court filing (Document 672) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 24, 2022. The entire content of the page is redacted, leaving only the court header and the DOJ bates number (DOJ-OGR-00010626) visible.
This document is a cover page for "EXHIBIT A" from a legal proceeding. It is identified as page 10 of 29 of Document 522, filed on April 6, 2012, in case number 1:09-cr-00581-WHP. The page also contains an overlapping header from a different case (1:20-cr-00338-AEN) and a Department of Justice Bates number (DOJ-OGR-00010135).
This is the signature page (page 31 of 32) of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 9, 2022, and filed on March 11, 2022. The text concludes a motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. It lists the defense counsel team (Pagliuca, Menninger, Everdell, and Sternheim) representing Maxwell.
This document is page xxii of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 204), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases from 'United States v. Schafrick' to 'United States v. Swanson,' along with their legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the main document. The cases cited span from 1972 to 2015 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
This document serves as a cover page for 'Exhibit E' within a legal case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It states that the exhibit was filed on May 25, 2021, and is currently under seal, bearing a Department of Justice document identifier.
This document is a Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Epstein, Reg # 76318-054, dated July 23, 2019. The log details observations of Epstein's behavior from 10:30am to 1:00pm, including pacing, eating, sitting on his bed, and washing his neck. A significant event noted is Epstein being taken to meet with his attorney at 12:40pm.
This document is page 2 of the Curriculum Vitae for Lisa Marie Rocchio, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details her clinical, training, consultation, and research experience in psychology from 1990 to 2003, focusing on trauma, youth assessment, and expert witness work in Rhode Island and Connecticut. The document bears a DOJ discovery stamp (DOJ-OGR-00005655).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity