| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe 3
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Miss Isell
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Jane Doe 102 complaint | Unknown | View |
This page is a transcript of a deposition (marked Rough Draft) from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a civil complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein,' confirming that Jane Doe 102 is Virginia Roberts. The questioning focuses on whether the witness asked Virginia Roberts' lawyer, Bob Josefsburg, if the term 'academicians' in said complaint included Alan Dershowitz. Attorney Ms. McCawley asserts privilege regarding communications between Virginia Roberts and her counsel.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (possibly from a congressional oversight hearing) discussing legal proceedings involving an unnamed defendant who invoked the Fifth Amendment and settled a claim with 'Jane Doe 102'. The speaker notes that attorneys Bob Josefsburg and Miss Isell specifically targeted Alan Dershowitz in their questioning during the depositions of Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez, implying Dershowitz had relevant information regarding the case, which is distinguished from a simple contract dispute.
This document is page 88 of a rough draft transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. A speaker discusses representing a victim of sex trafficking and recalls details regarding Alan Dershowitz. The testimony focuses on a legal complaint (Jane Doe 102) filed by Bob Josefsburg, which alleged that one or more 'academicians' sexually abused a victim identified as Jane Doe 3.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity