HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912.jpg
1.4 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal transcript (deposition or hearing - rough draft)
File Size:
1.4 MB
Summary
This document is a rough draft transcript page (possibly from a congressional oversight hearing) discussing legal proceedings involving an unnamed defendant who invoked the Fifth Amendment and settled a claim with 'Jane Doe 102'. The speaker notes that attorneys Bob Josefsburg and Miss Isell specifically targeted Alan Dershowitz in their questioning during the depositions of Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez, implying Dershowitz had relevant information regarding the case, which is distinguished from a simple contract dispute.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe 102 | Plaintiff/Claimant |
Received compensation to drop her claim against an unnamed defendant.
|
| Bob Josefsburg | Attorney |
Lawyer whose firm identified Alan Dershowitz as relevant.
|
| Miss Isell | Attorney |
Partner of Josefsburg; attended depositions and asked specific questions about Alan Dershowitz.
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness |
Deposed witness.
|
| Alfredo Rodriguez | Witness |
Deposed witness.
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Subject of Inquiry |
Identified by Josefsburg's firm as having relevant information; subject of specific questions during depositions.
|
| Unnamed Defendant ('He') | Defendant |
Invoked the Fifth Amendment, refused to answer complaint, and settled with Jane Doe 102.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by document footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912'
|
|
| Josefsburg's Law Firm |
Described as 'outstanding law firm'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Settlement of Jane Doe 102's claim
Jane Doe 102
Unnamed Defendant
Depositions of Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez
Relationships (2)
Josefsburg's partner, I believe it is, Miss Isell
she had asked questions about Alan Dershowitz in those depositions
Key Quotes (4)
"rather than answer the complaint, he settled the case through the payment of some kind of compensation that Jane Doe 102 found desirable for dropping her claim."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912.jpg
Quote #1
"Miss Isell (indicating), had been to some of the depositions of, for example, I believe Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912.jpg
Quote #2
"she had asked questions about Alan Dershowitz in those depositions, but had not asked questions about other academics"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912.jpg
Quote #3
"Bob Josefsburg and his outstanding law firm had identified Alan Dershowitz as someone who had information relevant"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,219 characters)
89
1 able to get information from because he was
2 invoking the Fifth, had refused or declined to
3 file an answer to that complaint.
4 Rather than deny the allegations, he had
5 ultimately, it's my understanding -- I don't have
6 inside information and I'm not trying to waive
7 any information, but my understanding is that
8 rather than answer the complaint, he settled the
9 case through the payment of some kind of
10 compensation that Jane Doe 102 found desirable
11 for dropping her claim.
12 The other thing that I found interesting is
13 that Josefsburg's partner, I believe it is,
14 Miss Isell (indicating), had been to some of the
15 depositions of, for example, I believe Juan
16 Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. I believe at least
17 one of those, and perhaps both of those. And she
18 had asked questions about Alan Dershowitz in
19 those depositions, but had not asked questions
20 about other academics in those depositions.
21 So that led me to conclude that Bob
22 Josefsburg and his outstanding law firm had
23 identified Alan Dershowitz as someone who had
24 information relevant -- and let's be clear, this
25 is not a lawsuit about some contract dispute or
2 invoking the Fifth, had refused or declined to
3 file an answer to that complaint.
4 Rather than deny the allegations, he had
5 ultimately, it's my understanding -- I don't have
6 inside information and I'm not trying to waive
7 any information, but my understanding is that
8 rather than answer the complaint, he settled the
9 case through the payment of some kind of
10 compensation that Jane Doe 102 found desirable
11 for dropping her claim.
12 The other thing that I found interesting is
13 that Josefsburg's partner, I believe it is,
14 Miss Isell (indicating), had been to some of the
15 depositions of, for example, I believe Juan
16 Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. I believe at least
17 one of those, and perhaps both of those. And she
18 had asked questions about Alan Dershowitz in
19 those depositions, but had not asked questions
20 about other academics in those depositions.
21 So that led me to conclude that Bob
22 Josefsburg and his outstanding law firm had
23 identified Alan Dershowitz as someone who had
24 information relevant -- and let's be clear, this
25 is not a lawsuit about some contract dispute or
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document