Interlochen
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Besselsen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Besselsen
|
Professional knowledgeable |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Patron donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Donor recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor benefactor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Student institution |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Female Passenger
|
Attendee student |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Besselsen
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor target |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Staff administrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Familiarity |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Sponsor donor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | SDNY serves subpoena to Interlochen seeking info on Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017637.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning covers her educational background, including an application to Interlochen at age 13 that was supported by a director from the Professional Children's School. The witness is instructed to read a paragraph from an exhibit, which describes the artistic and charitable activities of a family later identified as the von Trapp family.
DOJ-OGR-00017632.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' (testifying under a pseudonym) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Attorney Ms. Menninger questions Jane regarding her applications to Interlochen, specifically asking about her knowledge of financial aid and scholarships, and clarifying her age (13 to 17) during the three summers she attended. The Judge interrupts at the end to clarify if a statement made by the attorney was a question.
DOJ-OGR-00017622.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves a dispute over a witness's credibility ('impeaching') regarding where she lived at age 14. Ms. Moe argues the witness lived in a pool house due to financial issues, while Mr. Everdell argues that her 1994 Interlochen application lists a different address, contradicting her claim of being homeless or in a pool house.
DOJ-OGR-00018986.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on two flights, 573 and 574, that occurred in 1994. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was a passenger on flight 573, and that both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were passengers on flight 574 from Traverse City, Michigan, to Teterboro, New Jersey, on August 20, 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00018609.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between a judge and two counsels, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the scheduling and scope of testimony for a witness named Brian, who has a flight planned for the next day. The court directs the government to first inquire about what Brian learned from another individual, Jane, before he testifies.
DOJ-OGR-00016171.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the background of a witness named 'Jane,' describing her artistic upbringing, attendance at the Epstein-sponsored Interlochen program, and visits to Epstein's Palm Beach home with her mother and brothers. The defense argues that while Jane accepted flights from Epstein, nothing inappropriate occurred during their interactions, and notes she only decided to involve herself in the case after Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00019085.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Rodgers) detailing flight movements involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in August. It establishes that Maxwell was not on a flight from Aspen to Traverse City on the 18th, but rejoined Epstein on a flight from Traverse City to Teterboro on the 20th, accompanied by Dawn DeVitto.
DOJ-OGR-00019081.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony details flight logs involving a trip from Columbus to Traverse City with 'Jeffrey' and two unidentified passengers. It also covers a maintenance trip to Cahokia, Illinois, specifically for an aircraft registration ('N number') change and carpet installation.
DOJ-OGR-00017192.jpg
This document is a legal rebuttal arguing for the credibility of a witness named Jane, asserting that her memory of meeting Maxwell and Epstein and the onset of abuse at age 14 is accurate. It counters defense attempts to discredit her timeline by referencing Interlochen and flight records from 1994 and 1996, which place Jane, Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant together at key times and locations, including flights to New York. The speaker emphasizes that Jane's memory of the abuse is more significant than minor discrepancies in dating events by public figures' birthdays.
DOJ-OGR-00017176.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger. She argues that the jury should hesitate to convict due to a lack of credible evidence, pointing to inconsistencies in testimonies, the timing of changed stories relative to the opening of a victims' compensation fund, and the absence of physical proof like photographs or financial records. The speaker repeatedly uses the phrase 'That should make you hesitate' to emphasize her points about the weakness of the prosecution's case.
DOJ-OGR-00017161.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Menninger argues that Epstein's spending, including giving land to pilot Larry Visoski and paying employee tuition, appeared generous and educational rather than criminal. She refutes the prosecution's (Ms. Moe) claim that funds were used to buy off sex abuse cases by pointing out that accountant Harry Beller signed the checks and no bank representatives testified to the illicit nature of the funds.
DOJ-OGR-00017134.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to discredit an unnamed female witness or victim. Menninger argues the woman's story is full of inconsistencies, citing discrepancies in her statements to the FBI about her housing, the timeline of meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, and her description of her family life. The speaker ultimately alleges that the woman is fabricating details, specifically inserting Ghislaine into her narrative under the influence of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman, to strengthen her case.
DOJ-OGR-00017123.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The attorney attempts to impeach the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting discrepancies in her timeline regarding her age during Mike Wallace's 80th birthday and her financial independence. The text references flight logs, payments for schooling by Epstein, and a photo inscription Jane wrote to Epstein thanking him for 'rocking my world,' while also mentioning alleged flights with Prince Andrew and Mark Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017042.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the prosecution's closing summation in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details evidence placing both a victim ('Jane') and Maxwell at Interlochen camp in the summer of 1994, citing flight records showing Epstein and Maxwell traveling to Michigan in August 1994. The prosecutor also references a donation by Epstein for a scholarship lodge and correspondence from Interlochen to Maxwell as proof of her presence.
DOJ-OGR-00013024.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a conversation between two lawyers, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe, and the judge regarding the testimony of a witness named Brian. The discussion focuses on scheduling Brian's testimony around his plan to fly home the next day and the scope of his questioning, specifically concerning information he may have received from another individual named Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00013023.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Ms. Menninger) are discussing a potential violation regarding witness communication. Specifically, a witness named 'Jane' called an individual named 'Brian' after her testimony to warn him that the defense attorney was an 'expletive' and mentioned being shown an 'Interlochen application' during cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013472.jpg
This document is page 194 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The testimony initially covers legal liability regarding aircraft ownership, during which prosecutor Ms. Comey successfully objects multiple times. The questioning then shifts to specific flights and the witness's familiarity with Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00013412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on identifying a specific female passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's planes who is known to have attended Interlochen. The witness confirms the identity of this passenger by referencing Government Exhibit 12 without stating the name aloud.
DOJ-OGR-00014567.jpg
This document is page 167 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring a rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey. She argues that flight records from March and April 1996 corroborate the prosecution's timeline regarding Epstein and Maxwell traveling to Santa Fe. Additionally, Comey attempts to discredit defense attorney Ms. Menninger's cross-examination of a witness named Jane, characterizing the defense's questioning as misleading 'riddles' and 'nonsense.'
DOJ-OGR-00014555.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the jury should 'hesitate' to convict based on changed stories following the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, and the lack of physical evidence such as photographs, phone records, or proof of payments to Interlochen. She highlights the absence of corroborating testimony from the accusers' family members.
DOJ-OGR-00011726.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) containing the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The text details the background of a witness referred to as 'Jane,' describing her artistic upbringing, attendance at the Epstein-sponsored Interlochen program, and visits to Epstein's Palm Beach home where 'nothing amiss happened.' It notes that Jane accepted flights paid for by Epstein but initially refused involvement in the criminal case prior to his 2019 arrest, only changing her mind after his death.
DOJ-OGR-00017446.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on the Interlochen Summer Arts Camp in Michigan, establishing it as a camp for young, talented artists. The questioner asks the witness if they were aware that Epstein had attended this camp as a young man, to which the witness replies they were not.
DOJ-OGR-00017408.jpg
A page from the court transcript of the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Witness Visoski testifies about traveling to Traverse City, Michigan, in the 1990s and picking up Jeffrey Epstein's luggage from the lobby of the Interlochen School of Music, which he describes as a school for gifted children. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) then moves to read a stipulation (Government Exhibit 1004) into the record without objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00014500.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that flight logs suggest the accuser 'Jane' may have met Epstein and Maxwell in 1996 rather than 1994, noting a specific flight in November 1996 from Palm Beach to New York. The defense attacks Jane's credibility by highlighting a lack of flight records for when she was 14-15 and questioning her testimony regarding a 1997 lawsuit she filed against her school teachers.
DOJ-OGR-00014499.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, outlining inconsistencies in an unnamed female's history. Menninger highlights that the woman, despite claiming poverty, traveled internationally and had a budding acting career, yet failed to mention financial support from Epstein on her 1995 and 1996 applications to Interlochen, directly contradicting her later testimony that he was paying for her.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity