| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Besselsen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Besselsen
|
Professional knowledgeable |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Patron donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Donor recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor benefactor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Student institution |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Female Passenger
|
Attendee student |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Besselsen
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor target |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Besselsen
|
Staff administrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Familiarity |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Sponsor donor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | SDNY serves subpoena to Interlochen seeking info on Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | View |
This document is an email thread from November 2021 involving the transmission of Defense Rule 16 Disclosure documents from Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The attachments include certifications from AT&T and FedEx, FedEx invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The thread shows internal USANYS staff coordinating to save these files to a shared drive.
A discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated May 20, 2021. The production includes 'Interlochen records' and native 'carved' image files from various electronic devices (identified by codes such as NYC024321) that were previously produced in PDF format. The letter and materials are marked confidential under a Protective Order.
This document is a letter dated November 8, 2021, from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to the US Attorney's Office regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a Rule 16 disclosure, listing specific documents the defense may use in their case-in-chief, including AT&T phone records, FedEx records, Customs and Border Patrol records, Shopper's Travel records, and Larry Visoski flight manifests. The letter also lists General Releases from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (with names redacted), Palm Beach residence floorplans, and the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
This document contains a series of internal emails between SDNY prosecutors from November to December 2020, outlining a 'to-do' list and agenda for the upcoming trial (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's). The tasks include reviewing 'GM emails' in Relativity, identifying witnesses from Interlochen and the Professional Children's School, coordinating with the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) regarding evidence from the Palm Beach house search, and scheduling interviews with various witnesses, including Jo Jo Fontanella and individuals who were on flights. The document also references a discussion about 'superseder timing,' implying a superseding indictment was being considered.
An internal email from November 19, 2021, sent by an Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to a contractor. The email concerns the organization of evidence for trial, specifically requesting that embedded emails labeled 'travel' be added to '3500' (witness statement) folders and checked for 'Rule 16' discovery production. The sender notes uncertainty about whether the attachments were previously received from 'Interlochen'.
This document is a Government Exhibit Index from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 28, 2021. It lists hundreds of exhibits including physical evidence (massage tables, contact books), photographs of victims and properties (Palm Beach, NY, Island), flight logs, financial records, and emails. The index organizes these exhibits by series numbers, providing descriptions, Bates ranges, and production dates for each item.
This document is an 11-page Government Exhibit Index from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial, dated November 23, 2021. It lists hundreds of exhibits including physical evidence (massage tables, hard drives), photographs of victims and properties (Palm Beach, NY, Zorro Ranch, Little St. James), financial records (JPMC), and school records. Notably, the index lists two flight logbooks (GX-661 and GX-662) covering 1991 to 2013, though the specific flight details are not contained within this index document itself.
This document is a formal discovery letter from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated August 5, 2020. It lists a comprehensive index of evidence provided to the defense, including financial records from multiple banks (Citibank, Chase, TD Bank, etc.), travel records (flight manifests and airline records), email account records (Oath, Microsoft, Google), and corporate filings (USVI, Delaware). While the document *lists* the existence of flight manifests and financial records, it is an index only and does not contain the specific content (flight paths, transaction amounts) within the document itself.
An email dated November 9, 2021, from defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) providing a Rule 16 Disclosure. The email includes attachments referencing AT&T certifications, FedEx records/invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness, Mr. Besselsen, is being examined by Mr. Rohrbach regarding a Salesforce report titled 'MJS Report' generated from Interlochen's database. The testimony confirms that a specific individual (whose name is withheld in this segment) attended Interlochen arts camp during the summers of 1994, 1995, and 1996.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Besselsen by Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony discusses a document (likely a letter) regarding 'Jeffrey's personal inventory' (linens, etc.) stored at a facility on the Interlochen campus. The witness confirms that the 'Epstein Scholarship Lodge' is also known as 'Green Lake Lodge'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness, Mr. Besselsen, reads a letter from 1994 into evidence. The letter, from Interlochen's Vice President Tim Ambrose to Ghislaine Maxwell, discusses finding a lost envelope in the 'Epstein Lodge' and confirms a reservation of the lodge for 'Jeffrey's use'. The transcript establishes a connection between Ghislaine Maxwell, a 'Jeffrey' (presumably Epstein), and the Interlochen institution in 1994.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a witness, Mr. Besselsen, describes the contents of Government Exhibit 741. The exhibit contains letters from Interlochen's vice president of advancement to Mr. Epstein concerning the construction of a "scholarship lodge" on the Interlochen campus. Besselsen confirms one letter thanks Epstein for a $200,000 donation towards this project and provides construction updates.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Besselsen regarding the verification of a camper's file and application photo from the institution 'Interlochen.' During the testimony, Government Exhibit 743 is admitted under seal to protect the identity of a student testifying under a pseudonym.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Besselsen. Besselsen describes the contents of student files at an organization called Interlochen, which include faculty/counsellor comments and applications. The witness confirms Interlochen has a 99-year record retention policy and identifies Government Exhibit 743 as a 1994 application to the organization's summer camp.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the admission of Government Exhibit 741 (GX-741), an eight-page document, into evidence without objection. Following this, attorney Mr. Rohrbach questions witness Mr. Besselsen about record-keeping practices at Interlochen, specifically establishing that student files are kept in manila folders in a locked room in the Maddy Administration Building.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. The witness, Mr. Besselsen, testifies about Government Exhibit 741, identifying it as correspondence retrieved from a locked filing cabinet in the basement of the McWhorter dorm at Interlochen. The correspondence involves a letter from Interlochen's Vice President of Advancement to Jeffrey Epstein discussing the cost and concept of building a 'scholarship lodge' on the campus.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Besselsen. Besselsen testifies about their oversight of the finance department at Interlochen and confirms the institution's business practices regarding the retention of records for major donors, including letters, emails, and call notes. The testimony establishes the foundation for admitting these donor communications as business records.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the redirect examination of a witness named 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Jane testifies about her application to Interlochen, confirming that while she was having severe difficulties at home, her recommendation letters from teachers did not reflect this because she was 'very good at hiding' the abuse. The attorney directs Jane to look at Defendant's Exhibit J-3.
This document is a court transcript from a redirect examination of a witness named Jane, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning concerns an application Jane made to Interlochen in 1994 at the age of 13. The attorney focuses on a specific question from the application about difficult musical pieces performed, to which Jane had answered, "Nothing has been difficult for me." When asked what she meant by this, Jane states she has no idea.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney, Ms. Moe, questions Jane about her application for admission to Interlochen for the summer of 1994. This application is identified as Defendant's Exhibit J-3, which the court permits the jury to view.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner presses Jane on whether she recalls telling the government in December 2019 that she was introduced to the dean of Interlochen by Epstein at a cocktail party. Jane repeatedly states she does not remember or recall this event, though she does confirm remembering meeting the dean of admissions for Julliard.
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the Judge and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding a juror's question about a 'letter of recommendation' and 'Interlochen applications' contained in evidence binders. Following this discussion, the jury enters, and the court instructs Ms. Menninger to resume her cross-examination of the witness identified as 'Jane'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on her activities in 1996, including performances and applications to programs like a School of the Arts and Interlochen. The central point of this excerpt is to establish that on three of her applications from that time, there was no mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity