This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about conversations they had with their aunt concerning a lawsuit and a 'Mr. Herman'. The witness states that Tiffany Rich never had a conversation with Mr. Herman in their presence, and only answered the door before leaving.
This document is page 45 of a legal transcript from Consor & Associates. An unidentified individual (A) is being questioned about a visit to their house by federal prosecutors or FBI agents, which they estimate occurred in 2006 or 2007. The individual recalls about four agents visiting but cannot remember receiving business cards or cell phone numbers, suggesting their parents might have more information.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The witness denies being told by federal prosecutors about reimbursement or entitlement to money from a Mr. Epstein. However, the witness confirms having met with federal prosecutors, who they believe were from the FBI, at their home around the year 2008.
This document is page 42 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies having intercourse with someone named Jeff and denies telling someone named Epstein that she would bring her twin sister to him to make money. The questioner also confronts the witness with statements allegedly made to the police by an associate named Hayley, which the witness characterizes as non-accusatory questioning.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over the propriety of a question. The witness testifies that a "Mr. Epstein" asked her to do more than just massage him, specifically alleging he asked her to take off her bra.
This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness who confirms they lied to Jeffrey Epstein about their age, pretending to be 18 when they were not. The witness also confirms telling Epstein they went to school in Wellington.
This document is page 36 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a prior statement she made to Detective Pagan, suggesting she lied to a person named Epstein about her age. The witness denies the specific phrasing but admits to telling someone that she told Epstein she was 18, while attorneys Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold repeatedly object to the line of questioning.
This document is page 34 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein attempts to question a witness about a past conversation at "Epstein's house," while Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning, citing procedural issues like lack of foundation and predicate.
This document is page 33 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about their interactions with a man named Jeff, specifically whether they told Jeff's assistant about their background, which the witness denies. The transcript also captures a procedural argument between two other parties, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, regarding objections and the proper way to refresh a witness's memory.
This document is a transcript from a 2017 deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they had contact with Epstein but denies any prior communication via email, text, or chat before meeting him. The witness states they visited Epstein's house only once, approximately three years prior, and never told him they were under 18.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense and adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. A third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, intervenes to clarify a procedural point amidst the escalating argument.
This document is page 27 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from Consor & Associates. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, presumably attorneys. Mr. Leopold objects strongly to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct, browbeating, and harassment, and threatens to end the proceeding.
This document is page 22 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, likely attorneys named Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, regarding the proper procedure for making objections. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction, while Mr. Leopold defends his actions by citing the requirements of judges in West Palm Beach.
This document is page 21 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness who admits to sending a message to a friend calling the deposition 'stupid court s-h-i-t'. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a photograph from a press conference related to the witness's lawsuit, which features the witness's father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects, leading to a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, about the grounds for making objections.
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. It captures a legal dispute between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold instructs his client not to answer a question based on attorney-client privilege, leading to a heated argument about procedural rules and 'speaking objections'.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning centers on the witness's awareness of a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein by their attorney, Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, instructing his client not to reveal any information learned through their privileged attorney-client conversations.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness, accompanied by their lawyer, Mr. Leopold, is questioned about a criminal prosecution and a related civil lawsuit. The questioner reveals that Mr. Leopold has recently filed a $50 million lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about her living situation, confirming she lives with her aunt and uncle after being kicked out by her father around Thanksgiving of the previous year. The questioning occurs in the context of a fifty million-dollar lawsuit her father filed against Jeffrey Epstein, and it clarifies that her boyfriend, Brett Albritton, has his own apartment where she does not currently live.
This document is page 5 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. In this section, the deponent affirms they are fit to testify, states they are living with their aunt and uncle but cannot recall the address, and is questioned about a contempt motion filed by their mother. The transcript was prepared by Censor & Associates.
This document is page 155 of a transcription index from Consor & Associates, dated July 26, 2017. The index lists various words, numbers, and a name ('Zack') with their corresponding page and line number references from a larger transcript. The document also contains contact information for the transcription company and a public records request number.
This document is page 149 of a transcript index from a legal proceeding, prepared by Censor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords from 'proper' to 'remember' and their corresponding page and line number locations within the full transcript. The document is part of a public records request response from the DOJ, as indicated by the footer identifier.
This document is page 147 of an index from a legal transcript, produced by the transcription company Sensor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The page provides an alphabetical list of words (from 'named' to 'page') and the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. Several names are indexed, including Nesbitt, Nick, Ocariz, Ortell, Ortiz, and Pagan.
This document is page 145 of an index from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'lawyer' to 'lying' with corresponding page and line numbers from the transcript. It references individuals named Leopold, Lewis, and Licata, and locations including Loxahatchee.
This document is page 144 of an index for a legal transcript, created by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords from 'instruct' to 'lawsuit' and proper nouns like Jason, KATHRYN, and Lavelle, along with the page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The footer contains a public records request number and a DOJ document identifier.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity