This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about their parents filing a police report against Mr. Epstein. The witness is evasive and claims not to know answers, while their counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, citing lack of foundation and speculation.
This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying and visiting a 'crack house' in Georgia. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, frequently objects and instructs the witness not to answer the questions.
This document is page 108 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017, produced by Consor & Associates. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about her relationship with her 22-year-old boyfriend, Brett Albritton, who is a firefighter with the Palm Beach Fire Department. The questioning focuses on whether the deponent is underage and lied about her age, which she denies, stating the relationship is 'legal'.
This document is page 102 of a deposition transcript (Bates DOJ-OGR-00033090) recorded by Consor & Associates. An unnamed witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein regarding the identification of several men in a photograph or video, including John Brown, Steven Lavelle, Robbie Shergan, and Brandon Salnal. The witness also identifies a woman named Courtney Sailor and a man named Vince as friends of their sister.
This document is page 98 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of lawyer Burt Ocariz and his relationship with lead federal prosecutor Marie Villafona. The questioner also asks if the witness was aware of an alleged attempt by Villafona to have Epstein pay Ocariz to represent the witness, all of which the witness denies knowing.
This document is a transcript of an interview where an individual (A) is questioned about statements provided to law enforcement. The individual confirms giving one taped statement to Detective Pagan of the police and describes a separate conversation with the FBI that took place at their father's residence on Downers Road in Loxahatchee. The interviewee is uncertain whether the FBI conversation was taped.
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In this excerpt, an unidentified witness is questioned about their preparation for the deposition, which included a meeting with a 'Mr. Leopold' that morning. The witness also confirms they have previously read police reports related to the case and clarifies that a statement they gave to the police was in the form of a narrative police report, not a question-and-answer transcript.
This document is page 88 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their mother's husband, Paul, and his potential interactions with reporters. The questioning then shifts to the witness's knowledge of a Detective Recarey and a potential deal involving cooperation against someone named Epstein, as well as any contact with people who have been to Epstein's house. The witness consistently denies any knowledge of these subjects, and their likely attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes an objection.
This document is a single page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing a contentious exchange between two individuals, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, who are likely opposing attorneys. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding' and unprofessional conduct, while Mr. Leopold pleads to be allowed to make the record without interruption and calls for professionalism from all parties in the room. The exchange highlights a significant level of conflict and animosity between the two speakers during the legal proceeding.
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or interview from July 26, 2017. An unnamed individual is questioned about their knowledge of a relationship and potential financial transactions between their father and Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly. The speaker denies any personal contact with Connolly, denies being offered money, and claims to have limited knowledge of his father's interactions with the reporter, stating they only knew of a single phone call that occurred a year or two prior.
This document is page 83 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness acknowledges being aware of the arrangement after it happened but denies knowing any specific details, including whether any money was actually exchanged.
This document is page 81 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of several individuals, including Tony Figueroa and Zack Bryan, and events that occurred at a house belonging to a Mr. Epstein. The witness denies knowing most of the people mentioned but confirms they know Zack Bryan, leading to further questioning about that relationship.
This document is page 80 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is being questioned about their knowledge of other individuals involved in a case, including another person represented by a lawyer named Mr. Herman who is suing someone named Epstein for $50 million. The witness denies knowing this person, as well as individuals named Tony Figueroa and Anthony, but confirms they have read the police reports related to the case.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about their contact with Steven Lavelle, stating they no longer speak. The witness denies knowing two redacted female individuals by name but suggests they could identify them from photos, and also denies any knowledge of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury.
This document is page 75 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their knowledge of Mr. Epstein, including whether he or his employees ever harmed the witness's father's property and a more serious allegation that Epstein almost killed the father. The questioning also probes a past statement the witness made to police about a trip to Epstein's house with a person named Hayley, suggesting the witness lied to authorities.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their credibility, accusing them of lying on their MySpace page about their income and marital status, and also of lying to Detective Michelle Pagan in a tape-recorded statement three years prior. The witness admits to the MySpace fabrications, calling them a joke, but denies lying to the police.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
This document is page 69 of a legal deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page where the witness's age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and confirms that listing their age as 18 was a lie, with the questioning implying it was done to circumvent the platform's age restrictions.
This document is page 68 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an attorney named Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about lying about their age on MySpace, referencing specific exhibits. The witness admits to lying about being 18 but denies lying about being 19, while other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, interject during the questioning.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about a photograph (marked 18-001), in which the deponent identifies themself and Tiffany Rich. Mr. Tein then characterizes Tiffany Rich as the deponent's friend from the Quarterdeck Tavern. Other attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger, are also present and interject to ensure the clarity of the record.
This document is page 59 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from a deposition or hearing. It details a contentious exchange between attorneys, where Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning of a female witness, arguing that she has already answered the question multiple times and is being harassed. The other attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Goldberger, push back against Mr. Leopold's objections.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about her awareness of being sought and an incident where she switched name tags with a friend at her workplace, Quarterdeck, to avoid them. The witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects strongly to a question he deems harassment, highlighting a contentious legal exchange.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about how much money she hopes to receive from a Mr. Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs his client not to answer, leading to a certified question.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding on July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of potential financial compensation from the government for a criminal case and whether they ever received a victim notification letter. The witness denies knowledge of these matters, and another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity