United Kingdom
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Citizenship |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Hong Kong
|
Historical diplomatic |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
France
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Germany
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
France
|
Diplomatic colonial |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Citizenship property owner |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
China
|
Diplomatic tense |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Citizenship |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Official elevation of UK-China relations to Golden Era status | United Kingdom | View |
| 2003-03-31 | N/A | Signing of Extradition Treaty with United Kingdom (Pending) | United Kingdom | View |
| 2003-03-31 | N/A | Signing of Extradition Treaty (Pending status) | Unknown | View |
| 1993-10-15 | N/A | Conseil d’Etat decision no. 142578 | France | View |
| 1978-03-01 | N/A | UK petitions UNCHR for special rapporteur in Cambodia; blocked by Syria, USSR, Yugoslavia. | UN | View |
| 1922-01-01 | N/A | League of Nations issued the Mandate of Palestine | Palestine | View |
| 1916-01-01 | N/A | Sykes-Picot Agreement | Middle East | View |
EFTA00021575.pdf
This document is an evidence photograph (marked EFTA00021575) displaying the contents of a safe or personal effects, specifically a leather wallet sorted for 'Francs', 'Various', and 'Dollars', along with loose international currency. The currency includes approximately £460 in British Pounds, €500 in Euros, 440 Swedish Kronor, 10 Swiss Francs, and 230 Russian Rubles, alongside three coins and two redacted photographs.
EFTA00021353.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI/NYPD Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. The correspondence details the limitations of obtaining historical records from Victoria's Secret (limited to 2 years) and FedEx (1-5 years). Additionally, the emails discuss a search for specific photos and a request to coordinate with ALAT (Legal Attaché) to obtain UK travel records for both Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00020515.pdf
This document is an FBI Intake record dated October 19, 2020. A tipster, calling from the UK and claiming to be a former employee (2015-2017), reported Howard Lutnick (CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald) for alleged suspicious financial activities and fraudulent charity work related to 9/11. The caller alleged Lutnick was Jeffrey Epstein's neighbor and that the financial irregularities might be connected to Epstein's case; the caller also claimed the company caused him severe health issues and stated he provided documentation to the IRS.
EFTA00019892.pdf
A letter from Mark Anthony Taylor to Mel Stride (Chairman of the UK Treasury Select Committee) dated February 23, 2020. Taylor alleges that the TSC, FCA, and SFO are suppressing evidence regarding Jes Staley's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically referring to 'blackmail emails' held by the TSC. The letter also makes serious allegations regarding judicial corruption, the potential murder of a whistleblower friend in 2017, and accusations of pedophilia against high-ranking legal officials.
EFTA00019291.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on December 18, 2020, in support of her renewed motion for bail. The defense argues that the government lacks significant documentary evidence, relies solely on witness testimony from decades ago, and that Maxwell has strong ties to the U.S. through her spouse (whose name is redacted) and friends who have pledged assets. The document also addresses flight risk concerns, arguing that extradition from France or the UK is possible or unlikely to be needed due to waivers, and cites a COVID-19 surge at the detention center as further justification for release.
EFTA00018709.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum submitted on February 23, 2021, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in the SDNY. Maxwell proposes two new conditions to assure her appearance: formally renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent flight to those countries, and placing all assets (except legal fees and living expenses) into a new account monitored by retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. The defense argues these unprecedented conditions, combined with her strong ties to the US, negate flight risk and claims she is being unfairly treated as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00018572.pdf
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
EFTA00018515.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team arguing against the government's motion for detention and requesting release on bail. The defense argues that the COVID-19 pandemic poses a severe health risk and impedes defense preparation, and asserts that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest. They propose a $5 million bond secured by UK property and strict conditions including home confinement and GPS monitoring.
EFTA00017769.pdf
This document contains a series of emails between February and July 2020 involving Jill Greenfield (Fieldfisher) and Assistant US Attorneys from the Southern District of New York regarding the potential interview of a witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses the logistics of meeting in London versus the US, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel, and specific legal conditions such as anonymity, the presence of support persons, and the scope of questioning. Crucially, it reveals the client was employed by Ghislaine Maxwell and has filed a complaint with the Met Police regarding sexual assault by Epstein in London.
EFTA00016784.pdf
This document is a legal opinion by French attorney William Julié, dated December 18, 2020, submitted in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for release. Julié argues against the US government's position that France would not extradite Maxwell because of her French citizenship. He contends that under the US-France Extradition Treaty and the EU-US Agreement, France retains the discretion to extradite nationals and, unlike the 2007 Hans Peterson case, would likely do so in Maxwell's case.
EFTA00016177.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 3, 2020, involving a US DOJ Attaché in London. The emails discuss the UK media reaction to the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on the implications for Prince Andrew. The Attaché notes it is 'weird' that a redacted individual reached out just before the arrest occurred. The email includes a summary of headlines from major UK newspapers like the Daily Mail, which report on Prince Andrew being 'bewildered' by the lack of response from US officials.
EFTA00016172.pdf
This document is a letter dated July 17, 2019, from U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The Government disputes Epstein's claim that his Austrian passport was never used, stating it contains stamps showing travel to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s. It also notes Epstein has not clarified how he obtained the passport or disclosed other potential citizenships.
EFTA00016026.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 discussing extradition law, specifically concerning the enforceability of a defendant's consent to extradition from the UK to the US. The emails involve individuals from the US Department of Justice and the Crown Prosecution Service, clarifying that consent given in the US would not be binding in the UK and that a UK judge must independently verify extradition compliance with UK law. The discussion centers on a UK citizen, detained in the US, attempting to use prophylactic consent to extradition as proof of not being a flight risk for bail purposes.
EFTA00014822.pdf
This document is an AT&T Wireless phone bill for 'Jeffrey E Epstein & Co' dated June 14, 2003, covering the period from May 13 to June 12, 2003. The bill details charges for multiple lines, explicitly naming 'G. Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell) as a user who incurred significant roaming charges ($892.42). The call logs reveal a travel itinerary moving through Italy (May 18-19), Spain (May 20-22), France (May 23-26), Great Britain (May 27-29), and the US Virgin Islands (early June), alongside domestic calls involving New York, Florida, and other US locations.
EFTA00013307.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court found that Maxwell presents a significant flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, international ties (citizenship in France and UK), and lack of candor regarding her finances. The proposed $28.5 million bail package and offer to waive extradition rights were deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at trial.
EFTA00011192.pdf
This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.
EFTA00011187.pdf
A witness statement dated November 25, 2020, from the head of Sparta Security Services (likely Matt Hellyer based on context/signature) supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The document details the security protocols in place and narrates the events of Maxwell's arrest on July 2, 2020, in Bradford, NH, from the perspective of the on-site security operative who initially mistook the FBI raid for press intrusion. Sparta Security Services pledges a $1 million bond, citing confidence that Maxwell will not flee.
EFTA00011172.pdf
A sworn statement dated November 25, 2020, by a former UK Special Forces security consultant who provided protection for Ghislaine Maxwell from July 2019 until her arrest. The document details the events of the arrest on July 2, 2020, in Bradford, NH, from the perspective of the on-site security operative, who initially mistook FBI agents for the press. The consultant affirms their company's intent to post a $1 million bond for Maxwell's bail, expressing confidence she will not flee.
EFTA00010321.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, the legal team representing the Duke of York (Prince Andrew). The correspondence details a stalemate in negotiations regarding the Duke's cooperation with the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The Duke's lawyers offer a written witness statement limited primarily to the 1994-1997 period, citing concerns that the US views him as a 'subject' rather than a witness. The SDNY rejects this offer, declaring the written statement insufficient, and informs the defense they will proceed with a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request to the UK authorities (UKCA) to seek a compelled interview.
EFTA00003336.pdf
A photograph (Bates stamped EFTA00003336) depicting former President Bill Clinton and two unidentified men visiting the Churchill War Rooms in London. The group is standing in the background of the Map Room exhibit, viewing the displays behind wax figures of military personnel and a table of vintage telephones.
EFTA00003335.pdf
A photograph (Bates stamped EFTA00003335) showing Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, and Ghislaine Maxwell posing with three unidentified men inside the Churchill War Rooms in London. The photo documents the social association between the former President, the actor, and Maxwell, likely taken during the September 2002 Clinton Foundation trip.
EFTA00003181.pdf
A photograph (marked with Bates stamp EFTA00003181) depicting a woman, identifiable as Ghislaine Maxwell, walking past a stone wall and archway gate. In the background stands a stone tower, likely part of a church or estate, featuring a distinctive blue clock face.
DOJ-OGR-00018198.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The questioning focuses on Alessi's interactions with three women: Shelly Lewis (from the UK), Frances Hardinge (from South Africa), and Mandy Ellison (from South Africa). The witness confirms that Mandy Ellison was a lawyer for a 'Mr. Epstein'.
DOJ-OGR-00008390.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing dated December 15, 2021, details the Court's rejection of the Defense's request to allow a witness to testify under a pseudonym. The Court finds the request untimely, notes that other legal tools like a letter rogatory were available to compel testimony, and distinguishes the case from precedents involving undercover officers whose safety or operational effectiveness would be compromised by revealing their identity.
DOJ-OGR-00001714.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 10, 2020. The defense argues that the government is delaying the identification of 'Victims 1-3' and providing discovery too slowly, which impairs their ability to investigate allegations spanning 25 years across multiple locations (NY, FL, NM, UK). The text details a timeline of discovery disputes following Maxwell's July 2020 arrest, noting that a 13,000-page initial production failed to clearly identify the accusers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity