| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Joe Nascimento
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GLORIA ALLRED
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Government/SDNY
|
Cooperating witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mariann Wang
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co inmate investigative subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim recruiter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Brendan Quigley
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Connection |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robbie Kaplan
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Witness involved party |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. FIGGINS
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Manley
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
United Kingdom
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jenna Dabbs
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subordinate victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Colleen Mullen
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subordinate victim alleged |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Civil war outbreak and evacuation of client's village | [Redacted] | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury appearance where client intends to invoke 5th Amendment. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Childhood sexual abuse of the client | New York City | View |
| 2019-08-19 | N/A | Issuance/Service of Grand Jury Subpoena | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | In-person meeting between Nascimento, his client, and prosecutors (implied by July 13 email sayin... | Hilton, 600 Okeechobee Blvd... | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Grand Jury Subpoena Service | Unknown (likely Florida giv... | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Grand Jury Subpoena served to Nascimento's client. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Client served with a Grand Jury Subpoena by a federal agent. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-07-01 | N/A | Client flew to NY for dental appointments; Epstein arrested around this time. | New York | View |
| 2018-12-01 | N/A | Period of subsequent interactions between client and Epstein. | Paris, Florida, NY, VI, Russia | View |
| 2018-12-01 | N/A | Meeting with young girl (18/19) in Russia. | Russia | View |
| 2017-11-01 | N/A | Reference date for client's interactions (interactions continued beyond this date). | Unknown | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Employment of client by Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
An email thread from August 10-11, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. Attorney Jenna Dabbs (Kaplan Hecker & Fink) corresponds with SDNY officials regarding the status of the investigation, civil forfeiture, and restitution for her client (a victim/witness). The government official confirms the investigation is ongoing despite the death and coordinates support resources for the client.
This document is an email chain between attorneys at The Bloom Firm (Colleen Mullen, Teri Gibbs) and federal prosecutors (USANYS) regarding a potential witness in the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. The witness, a former employee of Maxwell (2003-2007), claims to have witnessed Prince Andrew's interactions with a redacted individual and possesses relevant documents. The correspondence covers scheduling interviews, discussing witness safety/anonymity, and the transmission of a list of office numbers used during the client's employment.
A letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to attorney Mark Manley regarding his client's anonymity in the *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* case. The government states they do not intend to call the client as a witness but cannot guarantee the client's name will not appear in public trial exhibits or testimony. The letter notably asserts that UK privacy laws do not apply in this jurisdiction and clarifies that the client is not considered a victim of child sexual exploitation in this specific case.
This document consists of an exchange of letters between Paul G. Cassell of the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law and an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard (Metropolitan Police). In the first letter (July 31, 2015), Cassell follows up on previous correspondence regarding allegations of international sex trafficking against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, offering his client's assistance in the investigation. In the response (August 10, 2015), the Metropolitan Police confirm they are progressing with the matter and request formal written confirmation that Cassell is legally authorized to represent the specific client involved.
A letter dated July 31, 2015, from Paul G. Cassell (University of Utah College of Law) to an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard. Cassell is following up on a previous correspondence from May 2015 regarding an investigation into international sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. He reiterates his client's (name redacted) offer to assist with the investigation.
This document contains an email chain from March 2020 between an attorney and likely a prosecutor regarding a legal submission on behalf of a redacted client. The attorney argues that the client was a 'vulnerable victim' and merely a 'cog in Epstein's wheel,' requesting a non-prosecution agreement ('non-pros'). The correspondence also highlights the impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on the legal proceedings and the client's mental health while in NYC.
This document is an email chain from March 2020 between attorneys discussing a legal submission on behalf of a redacted client. The attorneys argue that the client was a 'cog in Epstein's wheel' and a 'vulnerable victim,' seeking a non-prosecution agreement ('non-pros'). The correspondence also highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, noting the client's fragile mental state while isolated in a stranger's apartment in NYC and the attorneys' reduced productivity while working from home.
An email chain between attorney Brendan Quigley (Baker Botts) and likely SDNY prosecutors spanning from February 2020 to May 2021. The correspondence covers the signing of a proffer agreement in Feb 2020, a request in June 2020 regarding a civil attorney seeking to subpoena Quigley's client in connection with an Epstein civil case (which Quigley declined), and a request to schedule a call in May 2021.
This document is an email thread between Miami attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) spanning July 2019 to July 2020. It details Nascimento taking over representation for a client previously represented by his deceased partner, Alan Ross, after she was served a grand jury subpoena related to the Epstein investigation. The emails track the scheduling of meetings (proffers) in West Palm Beach and confirm the client's continued cooperation with the government, culminating in a check-in following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest in July 2020.
Email exchange from April 2019 between Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and a likely federal prosecutor regarding scheduling a proffer session for a client. The prosecutor requests the client's current legal name (as it has changed) and asks for phone numbers the client used to communicate with Jeffrey Epstein to help corroborate her recollections.
This document is an email chain between attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) regarding a client who was a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein (2004-2005). The correspondence begins on July 6, 2019, when the client is served a grand jury subpoena. Key discussions involve scheduling meetings in West Palm Beach, clarifying financial compensation the client received from Epstein (including a cash lump sum and perks like gym/English classes), and addressing the client's lack of a U.S. passport despite being a citizen.
An email exchange dated January 13, 2020, discussing scheduling a meeting. One party requests the availability of 'full brass' (leadership) for a presentation by defense counsel regarding a redacted individual on January 24, 2020. The respondent states they are out sick and cannot access calendars immediately.
This document is an email summary of an attorney proffer dated March 1, 2021, involving attorneys Mariann Wang and Gloria Allred and an AUSA. It details new information provided by their client regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein between December 2018 and July 2019, contradicting the idea that contact ceased in 2017. The summary alleges Epstein lured the client to various locations (Paris, Florida, NY, VI) under the guise of employment or medical help (dental), manipulated the client into feeling indebted, sexually abused the client in Florida and the Virgin Islands, and tasked the client with recruiting or vetting young women, including a specific instance in Russia.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [Redacted Client] | Jeffrey Epstein | $46,000,000.00 | Epstein accused of misappropriating more than 4... | View |
| 2024-01-19 | Received | MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC | [Redacted Client] | $1.36 | Test wire transfer confirmed received | View |
| 2024-01-19 | Received | Epstein JPM Fund | [Redacted Client] | $1,000,000.00 | Gross Settlement Amount | View |
| 2024-01-19 | Paid | [Redacted Client] | MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC | $75,000.00 | Fees and Costs Billed | View |
| 2024-01-19 | Received | Epstein JPM Fund/... | [Redacted Client] | $925,000.00 | Net Disbursement to Client | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [Redacted Client] | $10,000.00 | Lump sum payment of cash (less than $10k). | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [Redacted Client] | $0.00 | Payments for meals, salon appointments, clothin... | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [Redacted Client] | $0.00 | Payments to cover gym membership and English cl... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity