Nathan NYSD Chambers
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash Rule 17(c) subpoena to the Epstein Vi... | US District Court SDNY (via... | View |
| 2021-11-08 | N/A | Submission of joint letter regarding juror questionnaires in US v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-07 | N/A | Submission of joint letter regarding prospective juror questionnaires for the trial of Ghislaine ... | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-11-06 | N/A | Submission of Government letter regarding Minor Victim-3 to Chambers | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-29 | N/A | Submission of letter from MDC legal counsel to the Court via email | New York | View |
| 2021-03-16 | N/A | Submission of unredacted Reply Memorandum for Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application | NYSD Court (Virtual/Email) | View |
EFTA00018880.pdf
This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits an unredacted request to charge (RTC) and verdict sheet, noting that redacted versions will be filed on the Electronic Court Filing (ECF) system and that the defense seeks to seal 'Exhibit A'. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00018267.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 related to the case 'United States v. Maxwell'. An Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York forwards correspondence to USANYS personnel, originally sent to 'Nathan NYSD Chambers' (Judge Alison Nathan), attaching a joint letter regarding prospective juror questionnaires for the upcoming trial.
EFTA00018026.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2021, relating to the case United States v. Maxwell (20-Cr-330). Attorney David Oscar Markus emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit a responsive letter regarding a government filing from June 30, 2021, explaining that he lacked filing privileges in the SDNY. Judge Nathan's chambers replied with an attached order.
EFTA00016944.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18-19, 2021, regarding the filing of Motions in Limine in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons submits the motions to Judge Nathan's chambers on behalf of Jeffrey Pagliuca. Subsequent internal emails among USANYS staff discuss accessing the files, revealing an internal DOJ file path labeled 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'.
EFTA00016588.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 1, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email informs counsel of an attached court order and schedules a discussion for the following day to determine if there is a basis to seal the order.
EFTA00016509.pdf
An email dated November 28, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits a motion to preclude cross-examination under seal and copies defense attorneys including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger.
EFTA00016484.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.
EFTA00016470.pdf
An email correspondence dated November 24, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to counsel involved in the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). The email serves to distribute two attached orders regarding protective orders and subpoenas. Recipients include attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00016461.pdf
This document is an email dated December 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits a letter from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) and notes that the government has no objection to the letter being publicly docketed despite not being filed on ECF by the MDC.
EFTA00016265.pdf
This document is an email dated October 31, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to transmit an attached Order issued by Judge Nathan that was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00014710.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.
EFTA00014699.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
EFTA00014669.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
EFTA00013301.pdf
This document is an email dated April 29, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). The email transmits a letter from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal counsel in response to a court order from earlier that day, noting that the letter was not filed electronically because the MDC is not a formal party to the case.
EFTA00011164.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the filing of 13 motions in limine by the defense in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. submitted the motions to Judge Nathan's chambers on behalf of Jeffrey Pagliuca. Subsequent internal emails among USANYS staff discuss accessing these files via a shared DOJ drive path (referencing 'StAndrews' and 'USvEpstein') or via email attachment.
EFTA00011161.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 15, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20cr330). The correspondence originates from the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, informing counsel (including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca) of a memo endorsement related to the defense's motion on FRE 412, which was attached as a PDF and scheduled to be filed on the public docket the following Monday.
EFTA00011135.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence involves the submission of a joint proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire questions, with Judge Nathan's chambers requesting Word document versions. Additionally, the Assistant United States Attorney confirms the production of Jencks Act material and exhibits to the defense.
EFTA00010217.pdf
This document is an email from Nicole Simmons (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.) to Judge Nathan's chambers in the U.S. v. Maxwell case, dated November 13, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for filing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The filing was submitted under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions by the government.
EFTA00010184.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell trial (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons forwards a response to the government's motion to preclude the testimony of expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow the government to review for necessary redactions.
EFTA00010182.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 11, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). It contains a notification from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers to defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding a sealed memorandum opinion and order. The forwarding commentary discusses a '412 order' (likely referring to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 regarding sexual behavior evidence) and the Court's understanding of concessions made by the defense.
EFTA00010102.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 18, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan. The correspondence concerns a redaction error in a legal filing (Dkt. No. 453) related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, where a witness's name was inadvertently exposed. The Government requested the removal of the document from the electronic docket (ECF) and subsequently submitted a corrected version.
EFTA00010034.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to defense counsel (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to notify counsel of an attached order issued by the Judge that is scheduled to be filed on the docket the next morning.
EFTA00009897.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 21, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence details the attendance plans for victims and their counsel at an upcoming arraignment, specifically noting that Victim-2 will attend by phone while her attorneys, David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, will attend in person. It also confirms that four attorneys will appear on behalf of the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00005273.jpg
This document is an email dated October 21, 2021, from reporter Pete Brush of Law360 to Judge Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of a coalition of reporters from various news outlets, Brush expresses support for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's arguments against secret jury selection and vetting in the upcoming trial of USA v. Maxwell. The email underscores the press corps' interest in maintaining transparency in the judicial process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity