EFTA00014669.pdf

66.2 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email correspondence
File Size: 66.2 KB
Summary

This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Laura Menninger Defense Attorney
Partner at Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.; sent email to Judge Nathan regarding Rule 17 submission; recipient of emai...
Jeff Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Recipient of email from AUSA; Cc'd on email to Judge Nathan.
Bobbi C. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Recipient of email from AUSA; Cc'd on email to Judge Nathan.
Christian Everdell Defense Attorney
Recipient of email from AUSA.
Judge Nathan Judge
Alison J. Nathan (AJN); addressee of the email from Laura Menninger regarding US v. Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referenced as Ms. Maxwell; subject of the legal case US v. Maxwell.
[Redacted AUSA] Assistant United States Attorney
Sender of the top email challenging defense counsel's representation of attempts to confer.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District of New York (SDNY)
Government office prosecuting the case (Assistant United States Attorney).
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger).
Nathan NYSD Chambers
The chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, US District Court SDNY.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-05-06
Date of a letter referenced regarding particular photographs.
N/A
2021-05-12
Filing of Ms. Maxwell's Letter Response to government's submission on Rule 17 subpoena.
Court Docket

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the Southern District of New York court.

Relationships (2)

Laura Menninger Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Menninger submits filings on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.
Laura Menninger Opposing Counsel Assistant United States Attorney
Correspondence regarding case US v. Maxwell; dispute over representations made to court.

Key Quotes (4)

"In this filing, you represent that you have made multiple 'attempts to confer with the government' regarding particular photographs... and you further represent that those attempts 'have gone unanswered for days.'"
Source
EFTA00014669.pdf
Quote #1
"Our team is not aware of any communications we have received from you attempting to confer about this particular issue between May 6, 2021 and May 12, 2021."
Source
EFTA00014669.pdf
Quote #2
"Would you please either point us to the relevant communication, or correct this representation to the Court?"
Source
EFTA00014669.pdf
Quote #3
"Because Exhibit B was a document marked 'Confidential' by the government pursuant to the Protective Order, we are compelled to file this under seal"
Source
EFTA00014669.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,986 characters)

From: [Redacted]
To: Laura Menninger <[Redacted]>, Jeff Pagliuca <[Redacted]>, BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[Redacted]>, "'BOBBI C STERNHEIM'" <[Redacted]>, Christian Everdell <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Response to Government's Rule 17 Submission
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:54:22 +0000
Attachments: 2021.05.12_JSP_Ltr._re._Response_to_Subpoena.pdf; EX._A_.pdf; EX._B.pdf
Counsel,
In this filing, you represent that you have made multiple "attempts to confer with the government" regarding particular photographs referenced in our May 6, 2021 letter on this issue, and you further represent that those attempts "have gone unanswered for days." Our team is not aware of any communications we have received from you attempting to confer about this particular issue between May 6, 2021 and May 12, 2021. Would you please either point us to the relevant communication, or correct this representation to the Court?
Thank you,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: Laura Menninger <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 9:03 PM
To: Nathan NYSD Chambers <[Redacted]>
Cc: 'Bobbi Sternheim ([Redacted]>'; [Redacted]; Jeff Pagliuca <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]>; [Redacted])
Subject: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Response to Government's Rule 17 Submission
Judge Nathan:
Attached please find Ms. Maxwell’s Letter Response to the government’s submission on the Rule 17 subpoena items 9-11, and Exhibits A and B.
Because Exhibit B was a document marked “Confidential” by the government pursuant to the Protective Order, we are compelled to file this under seal, pending any contrary order by the Court. We are prepared to file the Letter Response and Exhibits on the public docket at the Court’s direction.
Respectfully submitted,
EFTA00014669
Laura A. Menninger
Laura A. Menninger | Partner
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00014670

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document