This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Laura Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Partner at Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.; sent email to Judge Nathan regarding Rule 17 submission; recipient of emai...
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Recipient of email from AUSA; Cc'd on email to Judge Nathan.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Recipient of email from AUSA; Cc'd on email to Judge Nathan.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Recipient of email from AUSA.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Alison J. Nathan (AJN); addressee of the email from Laura Menninger regarding US v. Maxwell.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referenced as Ms. Maxwell; subject of the legal case US v. Maxwell.
|
| [Redacted AUSA] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender of the top email challenging defense counsel's representation of attempts to confer.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Government office prosecuting the case (Assistant United States Attorney).
|
|
| Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. |
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger).
|
|
| Nathan NYSD Chambers |
The chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, US District Court SDNY.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Southern District of New York court.
|
"In this filing, you represent that you have made multiple 'attempts to confer with the government' regarding particular photographs... and you further represent that those attempts 'have gone unanswered for days.'"Source
"Our team is not aware of any communications we have received from you attempting to confer about this particular issue between May 6, 2021 and May 12, 2021."Source
"Would you please either point us to the relevant communication, or correct this representation to the Court?"Source
"Because Exhibit B was a document marked 'Confidential' by the government pursuant to the Protective Order, we are compelled to file this under seal"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,986 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document