A document dated April 2, 2012, appearing to be a draft article or legal commentary regarding the case of Jonathan Doody. It discusses the reversal of Doody's conviction by the Supreme Court (often associated with the Buddhist Temple Massacre case, though not explicitly named here) and criticizes the State of Arizona for planning a retrial and setting an unattainable $5 million bail. The text argues that Doody is being denied justice despite appellate courts ruling in his favor regarding a false confession.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Doody | Defendant |
Subject of the legal case discussed; conviction reversed but facing retrial.
|
| Doody family | Family |
Described as having no money to raise the $5 million bail.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Denied the state's petition for review.
|
|
| United States Court of Appeals |
Made decisions in favor of Jonathan Doody.
|
|
| State of Arizona |
Prosecuting entity planning to retry Doody.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the legal case.
|
"Again the state sought review by the Supreme Court. This time their petition was denied, and Doody’s conviction was finally and definitively reversed."Source
"The state of Arizona is now planning to retry him without using his false confession."Source
"Bail has been set at $5million, which his, of course, impossible for the Doody family, which has no money, to raise."Source
"If justice delayed is justice denied, then Jonathan Doody has surely been denied justice."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (733 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document