Pamela McCorduck

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
3
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
McCorduck

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Joseph Weizenbaum
Intellectual debate
5
1
View
person Joseph Weizenbaum
Intellectual disagreement
5
1
View
person Joseph Weizenbaum
Unknown
5
1
View
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016972.jpg

This document discusses the intersection of emerging artificial intelligence technologies and established human rights frameworks. It explores the ethical challenges of integrating non-human intelligences into society, referencing historical declarations of rights and debating whether machines can or should replace humans in roles requiring dignity and care. The text also touches on the necessity of making ethical decision-making explicit and algorithmic in the age of autonomous systems.

Document page from a book or report regarding ai ethics and human rights
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016817.jpg

The author reflects on the founding of "The Reality Club" and relationships with pioneering computer scientists like Danny Hillis and Seth Lloyd, discussing historical developments in AI and complexity science. The text introduces "The Deep Thinking Project," a collaborative collection of essays from 25 prominent intellectuals addressing contemporary issues in artificial intelligence.

Book excerpt or memoir page
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016389.jpg

This document appears to be a page (169) from a manuscript, essay, or book discussing transhumanism, artificial intelligence ethics, and the definition of human rights in the context of 'non-Homo intelligences.' It references historical legal frameworks like the Bill of Rights and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, while debating the capacity of machines to make ethical decisions compared to humans. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of materials reviewed during a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or associates connected to the Epstein case.

Scientific/philosophical manuscript or book page
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity