Victim-1
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Indyke
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI law enforcement officers
|
Informant investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim recruiter |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Victim-1 disclosed personal substance abuse, primarily involving prescription drugs. | N/A | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | JEFFREY EPSTEIN sexually abused Victim-1 on multiple occasions in the Subject Premises. | Subject Premises, New York,... | View |
EFTA00038194.pdf
This document is a redacted email sent on September 18, 2019, with the subject line 'Victim-1'. The body of the email contains a link to a Washington Post article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse of teenage girl detailed in lawsuit against his estate executors'. The sender and recipient information has been redacted. The email was sent from an iPhone.
EFTA00037378.pdf
This document is a post-indictment (circa July 2019) investigative summary by federal authorities detailing the history of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein from 2005 to 2019. It outlines his sexual abuse of minors in New York, Florida, and other locations, specifically noting that victims were as young as 14 and were paid $200-$300 per encounter. The text mentions cooperating witnesses (Victim-1, 2, and 3), the role of redacted co-conspirators in recruiting minors, and the prosecution's intent to pursue these co-conspirators following Epstein's indictment.
EFTA00029302.pdf
This document is an email dated October 15, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a colleague regarding legal motions and docket citations. The email references '3500 folders' (likely Jencks Act material) and distinguishes between a plaintiff who sued under her real name and 'Victim-1' whose case is identified as 'Doe v. Indyke'. The document appears to be part of the preparations for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial or related civil litigation involving the Epstein estate executors.
EFTA00028485.pdf
This document is an application for a search and seizure warrant for Jeffrey Epstein's multi-story residence in New York, NY, dated July 7, 2019. The warrant was sought based on probable cause to believe the premises contain evidence of sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy, with Jeffrey Epstein identified as the target subject. The application details testimony from 'Victim-1' regarding sexual abuse by Epstein at the premises between 2002 and 2005, and observations by law enforcement within the residence that corroborate Victim-1's descriptions, including a 'Massage Room' and a binder labeled 'PB Girls'.
EFTA00027158.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney to Judge Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email updates the court on victim attendance for an upcoming arraignment, noting that Victim-2 will attend via phone while her attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley will attend in person, whereas Victims 1, 3, and 4 will not attend.
EFTA00019314.pdf
This document contains an email chain from December 2020 between the SDNY US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding plea negotiations for a former personal assistant of Jeffrey Epstein. It includes a draft 'Statement of Facts' detailing the assistant's role from 2001-2013 in scheduling massages for minors, paying victims, and allegedly participating in witness tampering in 2005, while also acknowledging the assistant was a victim of Epstein's abuse.
EFTA00009897.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 21, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence details the attendance plans for victims and their counsel at an upcoming arraignment, specifically noting that Victim-2 will attend by phone while her attorneys, David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, will attend in person. It also confirms that four attorneys will appear on behalf of the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00019516.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 32) dated July 28, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues against the defendant's request to publicly name individuals who have identified themselves as victims of Epstein or the defendant, citing the Crime Victims’ Rights Act and legal precedents (Paris, Corley, Kelly) regarding privacy and safety. The Government advocates for a protective order that requires the use of pseudonyms (e.g., 'Victim-1') in public filings while allowing the defense to use names in sealed filings and internal investigations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity