| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
the west
|
Geopolitical cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
Canada
|
International cooperation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | India's development of a nuclear bomb | India | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| 2015-12-01 | N/A | Paris climate agreement (referenced as 'last fall's') | Paris | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | U.N. vote on Libyan military action | United Nations | View |
This document is a page from the participant directory for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017062. It lists high-profile international figures, their titles, organizations, and countries of origin, including leaders from Google, Microsoft, AOL, and the United Nations (Kofi Annan). The document is formatted in columns and contains no explicit financial transactions or communications, serving instead as a record of attendance or invited guests.
This document is a participant list from the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile attendees alphabetically (A-section), including CEOs, government officials, and heads of international organizations, along with their titles, organizations, and countries of origin. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017061', indicating it was used as evidence in a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document appears to be page 172 of a manuscript or essay included in a House Oversight investigation (likely related to Epstein given the context of scientific philanthropy). The text discusses transhumanism, the definition of legal personhood regarding animals (specifically chimpanzees), and the technological gap between modern society and uncontacted tribes. It references prominent scientists and tech leaders (Musk, Hawking, Tegmark) in the context of AI safety ('autonomous weapons') and questions the future rights of 'transhumans'.
This document, page 168 of a House Oversight file, appears to be a scientific paper or essay discussing transhumanism, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence. It explores topics such as gene therapy, 'brain organoids' (lab-grown brains), and the efficiency comparisons between human brains and computers (specifically referencing IBM's Watson). It also touches on data storage technologies being developed by entities like Facebook, the NSA, and Microsoft.
This document appears to be a narrative excerpt written by literary agent John Brockman recounting a trip to Milan in November 2011. It details how his friend, art curator Hans Ulrich Obrist (HUO), facilitated meetings for him with high-profile figures like Enzo Mari and Miuccia Prada. The text also describes a collaborative panel event in London involving Brockman, HUO, and other intellectuals.
This document appears to be a page (numbered 127) from a book or report included in the House Oversight Committee's materials (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016930). The text is a biographical or interview excerpt focusing on Venki Ramakrishnan, a Nobel Prize-winning biologist and President of the Royal Society. It details his views on how the internet has democratized access to scientific information for researchers in developing nations (like India), while simultaneously raising concerns about 'pseudoscientific jargon' and the erosion of trust in science due to 'black box' deep-learning technologies. While the document is part of a larger discovery cache (likely related to Epstein's scientific connections), Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page.
A Deutsche Bank presentation slide (page 23) authored by Francis J. Kelly detailing a $46 billion Chinese investment in Pakistan to build pipelines to Gwadar. The document analyzes the geopolitical implications, noting India's displeasure and potential threats from al-Qaeda and ISIS in the northern region (labeled on the map as 'Where the bad guys live'). It bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production, likely related to investigations involving Deutsche Bank.
A Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs presentation slide analyzing the 2016 US Senate elections. The slide features a map of the US color-coded by senate seat status and predicts that Democrats may regain control of the Senate. It lists Francis J. Kelly as the contact person and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a scientific essay or speech regarding global demographics, urbanization, and ecological sustainability. It discusses population projections for 2030 and 2100, specifically focusing on growth in Africa and India, while referencing historical population control controversies (eugenics, Indira Gandhi, China). The text argues for lifestyle changes, noting that the planet cannot support the current population if everyone adopts American consumption habits.
The document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from various sectors including finance, technology, politics, and academia. It includes names like Nicolas Berggruen, David Bonderman, Stephen Cohen (Palantir), and Mitch Daniels, detailing their current roles and board memberships. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of evidence collected during a congressional investigation, likely serving as a guest list or contact sheet.
This document is a biographical list containing profiles for five high-profile individuals: Paul Wolpe, Jed York, Lauren Zalaznick, Eric Zinterhofer, and Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg. It details their professional titles and corporate or government affiliations. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is likely an exhibit or evidence in a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a biographical booklet or conference program (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017555), detailing the professional achievements of physicist Lisa Randall and botanist Peter Raven. It lists their academic affiliations (Harvard, Missouri Botanical Garden), awards, publications, and contributions to their respective fields. The text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, though the document origination (House Oversight) suggests it is part of a larger collection of subpoenaed records likely related to scientific gatherings or foundations associated with him.
This document provides detailed biographical profiles of Mary Jordan, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist for the Washington Post, and Jon Kamen, the Chairman and CEO of the media company @radical.media. It outlines their career histories, notable works, awards, and affiliations.
This document is a biographical profile of computer scientist and inventor Danny Hillis, marked with a House Oversight Committee footer (likely related to the investigation into MIT's funding ties to Jeffrey Epstein, given Hillis's prominence at MIT and the Media Lab context). The text details his education at MIT, his founding of Thinking Machines Corporation, his tenure as a Disney Fellow, and his later ventures including Applied Minds and the Long Now Foundation. It highlights his philosophical views on artificial intelligence, parallel computing, and long-term thinking, specifically referencing his desire to create a 'thinking machine' and the 'Clock of the Long Now.'
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal review (likely authored by Alan Dershowitz given the style and context of House Oversight documents) analyzing the Mike Tyson rape trial. The text harshly criticizes the Indiana judicial system and Judge Gifford for alleged bias, unethical media lobbying, and procedural errors. It also details and questions the account of the accuser, Desiree Washington, highlighting her behavior leading up to the event to cast doubt on her testimony.
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or book draft (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the context of House Oversight documents) discussing the Mike Tyson rape trial. It argues that the prosecution and the accuser, Desiree Washington, suppressed evidence regarding a financial contingency fee agreement and Washington's sexual history. The text details how a Rhode Island lawyer felt ethically compelled to disclose the fee agreement despite the Indiana court ignoring it, and claims three eyewitnesses saw consensual physical affection between Tyson and Washington prior to the alleged assault.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz (implied context) regarding his representation of Mike Tyson. The text recounts their first meeting in Indianapolis where Dershowitz called Tyson a 'schmuck' for putting himself in a compromising position, which led to Tyson hiring him. It details Tyson's honorable conduct as a client, his time in prison, and his eventual repayment of legal fees after his release, while criticizing Tyson's original trial counsel.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal philosophy surrounding rape prosecutions, the trade-off between convicting the guilty and protecting the innocent, and the author's shift toward defending accused rapists. The text specifically details the author's involvement as the appellate lawyer for Mike Tyson following his conviction for raping Desiree Washington in Indianapolis.
This document is a page from the participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists approximately 40 high-profile individuals from various sectors including government, finance, academia, and media, along with their titles, organizations, and countries of origin. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017085', indicating it is part of a document production for the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
This document is a log of text messages exchanged on May 27, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses geopolitical strategies involving China and India, as well as navigating US political and legal figures including Biden, Horowitz, and Barr, alongside references to Deutsche Bank (DB) and New York State (NYS). The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production.
This document is a log of digital messages exchanged on May 24, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on high-level international political events occurring that day, including Theresa May's resignation and Narendra Modi's inauguration, mixed with cryptic comments about 'shared goals' and manufacturing in China/India. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from May 23, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The redacted individual mentions producing a show about Indian Prime Minister Modi and bringing 'American Hindu guys.' Epstein responds by noting Modi's focus is 'stopping China' and suggests the individual should meet with Modi, implying Epstein could arrange it ('I can set').
This document contains a log of electronic messages from September 28, 2018, primarily from Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) to a redacted recipient. The conversation covers global economic stability, the strength of the US dollar versus failed socialism in other regions, and specifically discusses Elon Musk's legal troubles with the SEC, with Epstein asserting Musk should not run a public company. Epstein also offers 'talking points' to the recipient.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from April 9, 2017, between 'jee' (jeeitunes@gmail.com, likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation references a meeting or interaction with 'Bill' (who is described as being critical of Trump) and includes an inquiry about business deals in India. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from March 29, 2017, between 'jee' (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses high-level geopolitical matters, including Narendra Modi's trip to Washington D.C., Israel's strategy, and 'Buy India' initiatives involving US manufacturing and potential security 'back doors.' 'Jee' explicitly states their expertise is 'money not politics' while transmitting intelligence to the recipient.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity