HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg

2.57 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / draft memoir
File Size: 2.57 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz (implied context) regarding his representation of Mike Tyson. The text recounts their first meeting in Indianapolis where Dershowitz called Tyson a 'schmuck' for putting himself in a compromising position, which led to Tyson hiring him. It details Tyson's honorable conduct as a client, his time in prison, and his eventual repayment of legal fees after his release, while criticizing Tyson's original trial counsel.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Alan Dershowitz Author / Appellate Lawyer
The narrator (implied by context of being a 'professor' and appellate lawyer hired by Tyson) recounting his represent...
Mike Tyson Client / Defendant
Focus of the text; described as a polite client who served 'hard time' and hired the narrator.
Don King Boxing Promoter
Recommended the narrator to Mike Tyson.
Unnamed Daughter Daughter of Narrator
Heard crying in the background during a phone call.
Unnamed Trial Lawyer Tyson's previous lawyer
Described as a 'prominent white collar trial lawyer' who made many mistakes and didn't seem to like Tyson.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
USA Today
Media outlet quoted regarding the poor quality of Tyson's original defense.

Timeline (2 events)

1992 (Night before sentencing)
First meeting between the narrator and Mike Tyson in a hotel room in Indianapolis.
Indianapolis, Indiana
Narrator Mike Tyson Entourage
During imprisonment
Narrator visits Tyson in prison; sits side-by-side facing a camera.
Prison
Narrator Mike Tyson

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the hotel meeting the night before sentencing.
Where the author visited Tyson and sent him books.

Relationships (2)

Narrator (Alan Dershowitz) Attorney/Client Mike Tyson
Mike was deciding whether to accept Don King’s recommendation that he hire me as his appellate lawyer.
Mike Tyson Professional Associate Don King
Don King’s recommendation that he hire me

Key Quotes (4)

"If you’re innocent, you’re a real schmuck."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg
Quote #1
"This man’s calling me a schmuck. He’s right. I want to know why you guys didn’t call me a schmuck. He’s hired."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg
Quote #2
"Was Mike Tyson the victim of the changing politics of rape?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg
Quote #3
"I need somebody who’s willing to call me a schmuck when I am a schmuck."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,442 characters)

4.2.12
WC: 191694
Was Mike Tyson the victim of the changing politics of rape?
The first time I met Mike Tyson was the night before he was to be sentenced and sent to prison.
Mike was deciding whether to accept Don King’s recommendation that he hire me as his appellate
lawyer. He was in a hotel room in Indianapolis, Indiana, with his large entourage. After briefly
discussing the case and the appeal, he turned to me and asked point blank, “So professor, I have
two questions. Do you believe I’m innocent and what do you think of me as a person?” I replied
to the first question that I had no basis at that time to form a judgment about his guilt or
innocence since I had not yet read the transcripts. He replied, “ok that’s the lawyers’ talk. I
understand. Now, man to man, what do you think of me?” I looked him straight in the eye and
said: “If you’re innocent, you’re a real schmuck.” He looked back at me and said, “You calling
me a schmuck?” I said, “Yes, if you’re innocent then you’re a schmuck for going up to a hotel
room at three o’clock in the morning with a woman who you didn’t know, without any witnesses,
thereby putting yourself in a position where she could accuse you of so serious a crime.” He
turned to several members of his entourage and said, “This man’s calling me a schmuck. He’s
right. I want to know why you guys didn’t call me a schmuck. He’s hired. I need somebody
who’s willing to call me a schmuck when I am a schmuck.”
That was Mike Tyson - - direct and to the point. While preparing his appeal I went to visit him in
prison several times. The prison rules required that we sit side-by-side facing a camera.
Whenever I would say something he agreed with, he would give me a gentle love tap on my arm
or on my thigh. A love tap to him! When I got back to my hotel I was black and blue.
One day I saw a guard taunt him mercilessly and watched him strain to control himself. He did
hard time in prison. I sent him books to read—about subjects that interested him such as ancient
Egypt, the “roaring 20s” in the United States, and the history of boxing. When I would come to
visit him, he asked me to test him about what he had read. He passed with flying colors.
Mostly we talked by phone about his appeal. Mike would have to wait in the phone line for hours
to call me. Once, as I picked up the phone, he heard my baby daughter crying in the background.
He told me to “take care of your kid” and he would call back later. He was always considerate.
Some people find it hard to believe, but Mike was a wonderful client, always polite, always
honest, always honorable, and always thinking of others. He ran out of money during the appeal
and I continued to represent him without pay. I never thought I would see a penny of what he
owed me, but several days after he fought his first fight upon being released, he sent checks to
every one of his lawyers for the full amount that he owed.
Tyson’s trial had been a disaster. His prominent white collar trial lawyer had little experience in
rape cases and didn’t seem to like Tyson. He made mistake after mistake, both tactical and legal.
The legal expert who reported on the trial for USA Today described the trial as “filled with
mistakes, omissions and elementary errors” by Tyson’s trial lawyers. I had followed the trial in
the media, but I didn’t realize what a terrible job his chief trial counsel had done until I reviewed
233
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document