U.S. Attorneys
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional supervisory |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | Interviews | A series of interviews began in September 2019 and continued until days before a trial. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Creation of the non-prosecution agreement (referred to as 'previous year' relative to 2008). | Unknown | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Mr. Epstein was facing U.S. attorneys. | N/A | View |
060.pdf
This document is a response filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. (The Palm Beach Post) to an emergency petition for writ of certiorari by Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues that the trial court correctly unsealed a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum related to Epstein's solicitation of minors, asserting that the documents were improperly sealed in the first instance and that no valid legal basis exists for their continued closure.
019.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, dated November 12, 2010. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas refers two motions—one for a protective order barring contact by Epstein and another for preservation of evidence regarding correspondence with the U.S. Attorneys Office—to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow.
EFTA00032884.pdf
This document is a government order (Contract No. 15JA5419P00000377) dated August 22, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a contractor named 'AUDIO PAINT'. The order, totaling $12,262.50, is for the conversion, labeling, and indexing of evidence related to the 'Epstein case', specifically approximately 22 VHS tapes and 49 cassette tapes into digital files. The document includes standard federal acquisition clauses and specifies a performance period ending November 21, 2019.
EFTA00026939.pdf
This document is a contract award (No. 15JA5421P00000117) issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Lisa M. Rocchio, Ph.D. & Associates, Inc. for expert witness services in psychology regarding the case United States v. Maxwell (20-CR-00330). The contract is for a total amount of $45,000.00 with a performance period from March 8, 2021, to December 31, 2021, and includes specific data security and personnel clearance requirements.
EFTA00024824.pdf
This document is a Standard Form 30 Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract between the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York and CACI, INC. - COMMERCIAL, dated July 11, 2019. The modification adds funds and task requests for 'PDF file management services' specifically for the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case 19-CR-00490). The document instructs the contractor to organize 66 folders of documents and place them on an FTP site for the USAO.
EFTA00000473.pdf
The document consists of a drafted letter from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to 'Alex' (likely U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and a handwritten note. The letter aggressively argues against federal prosecution, alleging misconduct by prosecutors David Weinstein and Marie Villafana, including leaks to the press (NYT, Palm Beach Post) and breaches of the U.S. Attorneys Manual. It references Ken Starr's outrage and argues that sex trafficking statutes are 'patently unfair' to Epstein, pushing for a resolution that avoids federal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00023148.tif
This document details events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing from June 2008 to June 2009, including communications between various officials regarding the handling of his case and concerns about the terms of his plea agreement. It highlights discrepancies and objections raised by Villafaña regarding Epstein's proposed custody arrangements, suggesting a potential violation of the agreement's spirit.
DOJ-OGR-00014863.jpg
This legal document argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts, a principle established since 1789. It contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Maxwell, citing legal precedent (Annabi) and statutes (28 U.S.C. § 547 and § 515) to support its position on prosecutorial jurisdiction.
DOJ-OGR-00000624.jpg
This document is the second page of a letter dated August 14, 2019, from Lamine N’Diaye, the Warden of MCC New York, to the Court. The Warden states that the facility will provide an update on the official cause of death for an individual (implied to be Mr. Epstein) as soon as the autopsy is complete. The letter copies several U.S. government officials, including Marshals and Attorneys, as well as two individuals identified as counsel for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000014.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts. It cites the case of Annabi to support the claim that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting an individual named Maxwell. The document includes footnotes referencing U.S. Code to detail the powers and limitations of U.S. Attorneys, including the exception that the Attorney General can authorize them to act outside their districts.
DOJ-OGR-00021860.jpg
This legal document argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts, a principle established since 1789. It contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting Maxwell. The document cites legal precedent ('Annabi') and statutory exceptions, such as the Attorney General's power to direct attorneys to act in other districts, to support its position.
DOJ-OGR-00021807.jpg
This legal document argues that the authority of U.S. Attorneys is statutorily limited to their specific federal districts, unless directed otherwise by the Attorney General. It applies this principle to a case involving Maxwell, suggesting that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not need to explicitly prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting, as their jurisdiction was already confined. The argument is supported by citations to U.S. Code and the legal precedent of 'Annabi'.
DOJ-OGR-00003312.jpg
This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00025265.jpg
In a letter dated August 12, 2019, Lamine N'Diaye, the Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, responds to an inquiry from District Judge Richard M. Berman. The Warden confirms that the ongoing FBI and OIG investigations into an August 10, 2019 incident involving inmate Jeffrey Epstein will also encompass a prior incident from July 23, 2019. Due to the active investigations, the Warden states he is unable to release any information regarding the previously completed internal inquiry into the July incident.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021717.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article dated August 19, 2011, detailing a court hearing regarding Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. Judge Marra heard arguments from victims' lawyers (Edwards, Cassell) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee concerning whether the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with victims before signing the deal. The judge also set a schedule for Epstein's attorney, Roy Black, to submit arguments regarding the unsealing of correspondence between the defense and federal prosecutors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity