Attorney General
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Franklin Roosevelt
|
Professional correspondence |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Administrative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. Attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deputy Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Solicitor General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorneys
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. ATTORNEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorneys
|
Professional supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Superior subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Franklin Roosevelt
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Franklin Roosevelt
|
Official correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Oversight response |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard Indyke
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roth
|
Communicated concern |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Potential repeal of Special Counsel regulations to close down the investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Evaluation of the Tison v. Arizona case arguments. | Courtroom (likely Supreme C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential firing of the Attorney General or Rod Rosenstein. | White House | View |
| 2025-07-19 | Announcement | The White House press secretary announced the President had directed the AG to request the unseal... | White House | View |
| 2020-05-29 | N/A | Article published regarding Attorney General's approval of Jeffrey Epstein's victim fund | New York | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Attorney General requests DOJ Office of Inspector General investigation. | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Drafting of official notification regarding an investigation involving the FBI and DOJ OIG (Conte... | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Initiation of FBI Investigation into Epstein's death | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | N/A | President called the Attorney General to fire McCabe. | White House (implied) | View |
| 2008-06-26 | N/A | Roth alerts Office of the Attorney General that Epstein's counsel might try to contact them for a... | N/A | View |
| 2006-12-22 | N/A | Amendment to Title 18, United States Code, specifically Section 3486(a) and (b), related to subpo... | United States | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Department updated its Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance to include t... | USA | View |
| 1995-04-28 | Policy issuance | The Attorney General issued a memorandum entitled “Deportation of Criminal Aliens” to all federal... | N/A | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel... | United States | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel stat... | United States | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it oppos... | United States | View |
| 0001-07-01 | N/A | Deadline for the next Special Counsel's budget request. | Washington D.C. | View |
044.pdf
This document is an official letter dated August 10, 2019, from Warden Lamine N'Diaye of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to Judges McMahon and Berman. The letter formally notifies the court of Jeffrey Epstein's death at 7:37 a.m. that morning, following an apparent suicide in his cell at 6:30 a.m. It mentions that both the FBI and the Office of the Inspector General are investigating the incident.
2020.09.22%20Exhibit%20M.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on September 22, 2020, from the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel to Magistrate Judge Hermon-Percell. The letter responds to accusations by the Virgin Islands Attorney General that the Estate is concealing financial information or 'structuring' transactions to avoid scrutiny. The Estate argues that the Attorney General has already received full transparency via subpoenas to FirstBank and requests the Court order the release of liens on the Estate's accounts to prevent irreparable harm.
EFTA00036688.pdf
This document is a chain of emails exchanged on August 10, 2019, the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence discusses a 'Draft Notification' and specifically notes that the text should reflect that the Attorney General has requested the DOJ Office of Inspector General to investigate the matter alongside the FBI. The participants' identities are redacted.
EFTA00036602.pdf
This document is an internal government email chain dated August 10, 2019 (the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death). The correspondence concerns a 'Draft Notification' regarding the event. The most significant content is an instruction to ensure the notification states that, in addition to the FBI's investigation, the Attorney General has requested the DOJ Office of Inspector General to investigate the matter.
EFTA00024363.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 10, 2019, the day Jeffrey Epstein died. The correspondence is between Epstein's defense team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten) and a redacted government official (likely DOJ/SDNY). The emails discuss the immediate aftermath of the death, including the initiation of FBI and Attorney General investigations, the lack of information regarding the cause of death or suicide watch status ('status of observation'), and a specific request by attorney Michael Miller to delay the autopsy so the defense could hire a pathologist to be present.
EFTA00023117.pdf
This document is an email dated May 30, 2020, sent by an Associate U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email circulates a New York Times article titled 'Fund for Jeffrey Epstein’s Accusers Gets Attorney General’s Approval' with the instruction to 'forward to all the right people.' The sender's name and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00019765.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 10, 2019, the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death. It involves communications between likely government officials (redacted) and Epstein's defense team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten) confirming the initiation of an FBI investigation, the distribution of a BOP press release, and a letter from the Warden. The emails note a lack of immediate information regarding the cause of death or the status of Epstein's observation at the time.
EFTA00019764.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 10, 2019, between a government official (sender redacted) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten). The emails discuss the immediate aftermath of Epstein's death, confirming that the Attorney General initiated an investigation and that the FBI has begun a rigorous inquiry. The sender notes they have not yet received details on the cause of death or the status of observation (suicide watch) at the time of the incident.
EFTA00019067.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 10-11, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. It culminates in a formal letter from attorney Martin Weinberg to government officials and the MCC, requesting the preservation of all evidence related to Epstein's detention, his July 23 suicide attempt, and his death on August 10. Specific requests include video footage, visitor logs, medical records, and notes found in the cell. The chain also includes earlier emails from government officials confirming the initiation of FBI and Attorney General investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00000075.tif
This document discusses legal arguments concerning the timeliness of an indictment against Maxwell and the scope of U.S. Attorney's powers. It states that the District Court denied Maxwell's motion, finding that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting her. Maxwell also argues that certain counts are untimely and that a 2003 amendment to the statute of limitations (§ 3283) should not apply to her case.
DOJ-OGR-00030181.tif
This document is a legislative act, H.R. 3048, from the 100th Congress, 2nd Session, dated December 22, 2006, amending Title 18 of the United States Code. It focuses on subpoena powers for investigations, particularly those concerning federal health care offenses, sexual exploitation or abuse of children (defining a victim as under 18), and threats against protected persons, detailing the conditions under which subpoenas can be issued for records and testimony, and outlining procedures for judicial oversight and non-disclosure orders.
DOJ-OGR-00030168.tif
This document is an Act (Public Law 544-106th Congress, 2nd Session, H.R. 3048) dated December 22, 2006, amending Title 18 of the United States Code. It focuses on provisions for subpoenas related to investigations of Federal health care offenses, sexual exploitation or abuse of children, and threats against protected persons, including former Presidents and their families. The Act details procedures for subpoena issuance, disclosure prohibitions, and conditions for record production, requiring the Secretary of the Treasury to notify the Attorney General of subpoena issuance under certain circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00015037.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on July 18, 2025, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The motion requests the court to unseal grand jury transcripts associated with the indictment, citing public interest and the importance of transparency. This action follows a July 6, 2025, memorandum from the DOJ and FBI which concluded their review of investigative holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence to investigate uncharged third parties.
DOJ-OGR-00014863.jpg
This legal document argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts, a principle established since 1789. It contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Maxwell, citing legal precedent (Annabi) and statutes (28 U.S.C. § 547 and § 515) to support its position on prosecutorial jurisdiction.
DOJ-OGR-00000732.jpg
This is a legal motion filed on July 18, 2025, by the Department of Justice in the Southern District of New York, requesting the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the Jeffrey Epstein indictment. The motion follows a July 6, 2025, memorandum which concluded that an exhaustive review found no evidence to support investigating uncharged third parties. Citing public interest and transparency, the DOJ seeks to release the underlying grand jury materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000651.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, detailing a conversation between the court, Ms. Comey, and defense counsel Mr. Weingarten. After confirming a protective order is self-executing, Mr. Weingarten begins to address the court about recent, serious events concerning his client's incarceration, referencing public statements by the Attorney General about "improprieties in the jail" and the subsequent removal of the warden and suspension of guards.
DOJ-OGR-00000623.jpg
This letter, dated August 10, 2019, is a formal notification from the Warden's Office at the Metropolitan Correctional Center to Chief Judge Colleen McMahon and Judge Richard M. Berman. It reports the death of inmate Jeffrey Epstein, who was found unresponsive in his cell that morning from an apparent suicide and later pronounced dead at a local hospital. The letter states that investigations by the FBI and the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General are underway.
DOJ-OGR-00000014.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts. It cites the case of Annabi to support the claim that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting an individual named Maxwell. The document includes footnotes referencing U.S. Code to detail the powers and limitations of U.S. Attorneys, including the exception that the Attorney General can authorize them to act outside their districts.
DOJ-OGR-00000013.jpg
This legal document argues that the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) was not bound by the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL). It cites the Judiciary Act of 1789 to assert that the authority of a U.S. Attorney is limited to their specific district, a point reinforced by an Assistant Attorney General who stated she played no role in the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00021860.jpg
This legal document argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts, a principle established since 1789. It contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting Maxwell. The document cites legal precedent ('Annabi') and statutory exceptions, such as the Attorney General's power to direct attorneys to act in other districts, to support its position.
DOJ-OGR-00021807.jpg
This legal document argues that the authority of U.S. Attorneys is statutorily limited to their specific federal districts, unless directed otherwise by the Attorney General. It applies this principle to a case involving Maxwell, suggesting that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not need to explicitly prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting, as their jurisdiction was already confined. The argument is supported by citations to U.S. Code and the legal precedent of 'Annabi'.
DOJ-OGR-00021340.jpg
This legal document, a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, analyzes the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein. OPR concluded that the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) did not violate department policy by declining to prosecute two of Epstein's foreign national assistants, which would have triggered their deportation. The report also states that the evidence does not establish that prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, were influenced by improper motives like Epstein's wealth when they agreed to terms favorable to him.
DOJ-OGR-00021330.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines several of the Florida Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) that are applicable to attorneys practicing before the court. The page details the rules for Competence (FRPC 4-1.1), Diligence (FRPC 4-1.3), and Candor in Dealing with Others (FRPC 4-4.1), providing explanations and context from the official comments to these rules.
State of Arizona's argument
Argued presence at the scene was essential but conceded lack of proof of intent to kill.
Records Feb 1 2020 - June 30 2020
Subpoena for all transaction records.
Prioritizing home confinement for inmates
The Attorney General's original memo instructed the Bureau of Prisons to prioritize home confinement as an appropriate response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Records 1998-2020
Subpoena for Estate's operating account records.
Firing Andrew McCabe
President called upon the Attorney General to fire McCabe.
Firing Andrew McCabe
President called upon the Attorney General to fire McCabe.
Deportation of Criminal Aliens
A memorandum directing federal prosecutors to be actively involved in removing criminal aliens from the United States.
Deportation of Criminal Aliens
A memorandum directing federal prosecutors to actively and directly become involved in the process of removing criminal aliens from the United States, outlining tools for doing so and establishing a policy that all deportable criminal aliens should be deported absent extraordinary circumstances.
No Subject
A legal opinion from President Roosevelt to Attorney General Jackson regarding the unconstitutionality of a legislative veto in the Lend-Lease Act.
No Subject
Legal opinion from Roosevelt to Jackson concerning the unconstitutionality of a legislative veto in the Lend-Lease Act.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity