Petitioners

Person

Mentions

6

Relationships

6

Events

14

Documents

3

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

6 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
location United States	Legal representative	7	3	View
person Epstein	Adversarial	6	1	View
person USAO-SDFL	Professional	6	1	View
person Epstein	Adversarial victim perpetrator	5	1	View
person Epstein	Victim accused	1	1	View
organization GOVERNMENT	Opposing parties	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	Litigation	CVRA litigation	N/A	View
N/A	Legal proceeding / discussion	Analysis of legal principles regarding the setting aside of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, specific...	Southern District of Florida	View
2020-08-07	Court ruling	Petitioners' petition for rehearing en banc granted.	N/A	View
2019-09-16	Court ruling	Dist. Ct. closes CVRA case and denies petitioners' request for remedies.	N/A	View
2019-09-16	Court ruling	The district judge denied the petitioners' motion for remedies and closed the CVRA case following...	N/A	View
2019-02-21	N/A	Court's Opinion and Order determining CVRA violation.	Southern District of Florida	View
2015-03-24	N/A	Document entered on FLSD Docket	Florida Southern District C...	View
2011-09-26	Legal proceeding	The Court issued an Order related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement.	N/A	View
2011-04-07	N/A	Motion regarding unsealing of correspondence (mentioned in footnote).	Court	View
2008-08-21	Legal proceeding	The court ordered the government to provide petitioners with a copy of the NPA subject to a prote...	Federal Court	View
2008-08-01	Legal proceeding	Petitioners in the CVRA litigation filed a motion seeking access to the NPA.	Federal Court	View
2008-07-11	N/A	Hearing Transcript (Hr’g Tr.) cited where Petitioners agreed the best they can get is the right t...	Court	View
2008-07-11	Hearing	A court hearing where it was acknowledged that prosecutors had spoken to Petitioners about what h...	N/A	View
2008-01-01	N/A	Order to Produce and Protective Order issued granting Petitioners' motion to see the Non-Prosecut...	Southern District of Florida	View

DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing (likely by the DOJ) arguing that the Petitioners' claims are unripe. The government contends that the Petitioners are not precluded from conferring with government attorneys in other districts about pursuing charges against Epstein not covered by the Non-Prosecution Agreement. It cites case law to support the dismissal of claims based on future, hypothetical events.

Legal brief / court filing

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000315.jpg

This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, authorized by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, was limited in scope. It contends the NPA only barred federal prosecution for specific offenses within the Southern District of Florida and did not prevent the United States from bringing other federal criminal charges against him elsewhere. The document quotes the agreement to support its claim that the federal government's ability to prosecute Epstein was not fully relinquished.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg

This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered on July 9, 2019. The government argues that the Petitioners (victims) lack standing to void Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) because the government is contractually bound to it, and a favorable ruling would not redress their injury. However, the document notably admits that a federal investigation and potential prosecution of Epstein remains a 'legally viable possibility' regardless of the NPA's status.

Legal filing / court order (page from a memorandum or response)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

1

As Recipient

1

Total

2

Consultation regarding federal criminal case

From: Petitioners

To: Government Attorney

Petitioners have the ability to confer with an attorney for the government about a federal criminal case against Epstein.

Meeting

N/A

Communication Source

CVRA Litigation Discovery

From: USAO

To: Petitioners

Substantial document productions, privilege logs, and declarations from AUSA and FBI agents.

Legal discovery

2010-01-01

Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity