Watson
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
IBM
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Greene
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James Tagg
|
Author subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Social professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
IBM
|
Creator creation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
IBM
|
Product creation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Grosof
|
Dined together |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Grosof
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jeopardy Game / Simulation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | David Grosof saw Watson talk on a book tour at Google (~4 years prior to the email date of 2017). | View | |
| N/A | N/A | IBM's Watson plays Jeopardy against human contestants | Jeopardy Studio (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | David Grosof saw Watson talk on a book tour at Google. | View | |
| N/A | N/A | Jeopardy! match featuring Watson | Jeopardy! Studio | View |
| 2020-04-08 | N/A | Scheduled conference call to discuss evidence processing issues. | Remote/Phone | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Planned meeting with Watson | Watson's house, Cold Spring... | View |
| 2019-07-05 | N/A | Lunch with Watson | Cold Spring | View |
| 2017-01-20 | N/A | David Grosof having dinner with Jin Watson | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-20 | N/A | Dinner with Jin Watson (James Watson) | Unknown | View |
| 2017-01-20 | N/A | Dinner with Jin Watson | Unknown | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Watson featured as a contestant on Jeopardy and beat record-holding contestants. | Jeopardy (TV Show) | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Watson winning Jeopardy! | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | IBM unveiled Watson. | Unknown | View |
EFTA00031889.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI (NY CART) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The emails highlight significant technical and logistical friction, including delays caused by FBI network updates, disputes over file formats (Relativity vs. forensic raw data), and the US Attorney's urgent need for evidence to support 'additional charges.' The correspondence details specific hardware seized (Dell servers, Sony laptops, loose media) and references a prior 2007 search, while confirming that an initial screen for Child Pornography (CP) appears to have been negative. Note: The mention of 'flight records' on page 10 is a hypothetical example used by the US Attorney to illustrate a broken email attachment link, not a specific flight log contained in this file.
EFTA00026467.pdf
This Wall Street Journal newsletter from January 26, 2021, highlights the resignation of Apollo Global Management CEO Leon Black following an independent probe into his ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The report revealed Black paid Epstein $148 million for advice, though it stated Black was not involved in Epstein's criminal activities. The newsletter also covers general news including Janet Yellen's confirmation, Dominion Voting Systems suing Rudy Giuliani, and COVID-19 updates.
DOJ-OGR-00008401.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a court transcript or motion, dated December 17, 2021. The speaker argues against a defense strategy that challenges the thoroughness of a government investigation, citing multiple legal precedents (e.g., Watson, Gray v. Ercole, United States v. Birbal) to support the principle that the government's choice of investigative techniques is generally irrelevant to the defendant's guilt. The argument distinguishes these cases from another, Bowen v. Maynard, where evidence of an alternative suspect was deemed material.
DOJ-OGR-00008400.jpg
This document is page 18 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 17, 2021. The text contains legal arguments discussing case law precedents (*Kyles* and *Watson v. Greene*) regarding the admissibility of evidence related to the thoroughness of a law enforcement investigation and *Brady* material obligations. The text specifically analyzes a precedent involving a shooting investigation to argue about what lines of cross-examination should be permitted regarding police diligence.
DOJ-OGR-00016770.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney argues to a judge that the government failed to properly investigate information provided by witnesses, which is probative of the defendant's innocence. The attorney cites the 'Watson case' as precedent where law enforcement prematurely concluded guilt and then begins to question a witness about conversations with a person named 'Jane' regarding 'group sexualized massages'.
DOJ-OGR-00016769.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney argues that the government's investigation was not thorough. The attorney uses the example of a witness, Jane, who testified about her involvement in 'sexualized massages' and named other participants, including a 'Michelle'. The attorney claims that despite this information, the government failed to follow up and interview Michelle and others, arguing this lack of diligence is significant to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00009608.jpg
This document constitutes page 46 of a legal filing (Document 621) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 25, 2022. The text argues that Maxwell failed to prove that the Government intentionally delayed her indictment to gain a 'tactical advantage,' citing numerous Second Circuit legal precedents to support this standard. The court dismisses Maxwell's arguments regarding the delay as 'specious' and notes a lack of evidence that the delay was intended to thwart her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00003014.jpg
This document is page 80 of a legal filing (Document 204) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding the dismissal of an indictment due to pre-indictment delay, citing numerous Second Circuit precedents (such as Cornielle, Alameh, and Delacruz) to establish that a defendant must prove the Government intentionally delayed specifically to gain a 'tactical advantage.'
DOJ-OGR-00002959.jpg
This document is page xxiv of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations with corresponding page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The majority of the cases listed involve the United States as a party against various individuals and one corporation.
DOJ-OGR-00005581.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing arguing against the defense's interpretation of Brady material. The author contends that the cases cited by the defense (such as Kyles, Bowen, and Lindsey) concern the withholding of directly exculpatory evidence and do not support the defense's attempt to introduce irrelevant information to attack the general 'thoroughness' of the investigation. The document uses precedent from Watson v. Greene to argue that these cases offer no guidance on what evidence must be admitted at trial for cross-examination purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016971.jpg
This document, page 168 of a House Oversight file, appears to be a scientific paper or essay discussing transhumanism, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence. It explores topics such as gene therapy, 'brain organoids' (lab-grown brains), and the efficiency comparisons between human brains and computers (specifically referencing IBM's Watson). It also touches on data storage technologies being developed by entities like Facebook, the NSA, and Microsoft.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016850.jpg
The text argues against the creation of artificial conscious agents, suggesting that humanity has a surplus of natural conscious agents and only requires intelligent tools without rights or feelings. It explores the philosophical and legal difficulties of treating AI as morally responsible agents capable of signing binding contracts, noting that their lack of vulnerability and mortality makes credible commitment impossible. The author recounts a seminar challenge regarding robot autonomy and references works by Joanna J. Bryson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027846.jpg
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on July 6, 2019 (the day of Jeffrey Epstein's arrest). The conversation is between Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They discuss plans to visit 'Watson' at his house in Cold Spring Harbor on the following Monday, after which Epstein planned to travel to his island for the rest of the week.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027843.jpg
This document contains a forensic log of electronic messages from July 5, 2019, the day before Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. The messages serve as a conversation between Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. Key contents include a cryptic inquiry about 'Mike' and 'dog nato aspiration', a 'Time sensitive' alert from the redacted sender, and Epstein's travel plans to Cold Spring for lunch with 'Watson'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027807.jpg
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on June 17, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves the redacted sender addressing the recipient as 'Watson!' and discussing a plan to visit a third male party ('We will go to him'), who is reported to be 'thrilled.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is evidence in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015698.jpg
This document page appears to be an excerpt from a book or article titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' (Page 8) discussing Artificial Intelligence. It specifically details IBM's creation of the 'Watson' computer, its database sources (Wikipedia, Britannica), and its successful 2011 appearance on the game show Jeopardy. While the content is strictly about AI and trivia questions, the page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015698' stamp, indicating it was included in a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger cache of evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015646.jpg
This Daily Mail Online article from December 8, 2015, details Virginia's experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, starting when she was 17. She describes being flown to Britain to meet Prince Andrew, massaging Epstein, being paid for 'erotic massages,' and being trained to 'entertain' Epstein's friends and associates on his properties in New Mexico and the Caribbean. The article also mentions Virginia's use of Xanax provided by Epstein and her feelings of being 'special' and cared for by Epstein and Ghislaine, despite the exploitative nature of their relationship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015952.jpg
This document appears to be page 262 of a book or manuscript titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' written by an individual named Tagg. The text discusses Artificial Intelligence, the 'Halting Problem,' and the origin of computer bugs, referencing Brooks' essential complexity. The page includes a photo of the IBM Watson Jeopardy! challenge and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015761.jpg
This document appears to be page 71 of a book or academic text discussing financial market behavior, 'quants,' and Artificial Intelligence theory, specifically the Turing Test. It references Alan Turing's 1950 work and uses analogies involving Facebook and IBM's Watson. The page bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015761, indicating it was produced as evidence in a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community or funding of AI research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013944.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book or instructional guide regarding workplace productivity, negotiation for remote work, and automation (likely from 'The 4-Hour Workweek' by Timothy Ferriss, based on the content style). It contains numbered steps for transitioning to remote work and inspirational quotes. While it bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, the content itself is generic business advice and contains no specific information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or criminal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025186.jpg
This document contains two emails from David Grosof on January 20, 2017. The first is a reply to a previous email from January 19, 2017, discussing various topics including 'signal intelligence in biological systems', 'consciousness hacking', and a postscript about political events and emergency preparedness. The second email is a birthday message to 'Jeffrey' (likely Jeffrey Epstein), offering assistance and outlining David Grosof's interests in open science and open culture initiatives.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 20, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E./jeevacation) and David Grosof. The conversation is highly theoretical, discussing physics concepts such as gravity, probability, centrifugal force, and the law of large numbers, including a reference to Einstein's quote about God playing dice. The thread also includes Grosof mentioning his past meetings with famous scientists Watson (James Watson) and Crick (Francis Crick), noting Watson's opinions on autism during a Google book tour.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025181.jpg
An email thread from January 2017 between David Grosof and 'Jeffrey' (presumed Epstein). Grosof sends birthday wishes ('spin around the sun') and offers his consulting services as a gift, listing interests in open science and internet archives. They discuss neuroscience, 'consciousness hacking,' and political concerns regarding the Trump administration. Jeffrey's replies touch on encryption algorithms in nature and mention he is having dinner with 'Jin Watson' (likely James Watson).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 20, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email jeevacation@gmail.com) and David Grosof. The conversation is highly intellectual, discussing concepts of physics such as gravity, centrifugal force, inertial reference frames, and probability statistics. Grosof also mentions meeting scientists Watson (James Watson) and Crick (Francis Crick) and asks if Epstein knows Watson well.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.jpg
An email thread from January 20, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein and David Grosof discussing theoretical physics (gravity, probability) and biological encryption. Epstein mentions he is having dinner with 'Jin Watson' (likely James Watson). Grosof discusses meeting Watson and Francis Crick previously, noting Watson's 'overconfident' ideas about autism.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity