[Redacted] (Assistant U.S. Attorney)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted] (Legal Assistant)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Approver)
|
Subordinate supervisor |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-12-04 | N/A | Meeting involving 'Roy' | Implied West Palm Beach or ... | View |
EFTA00021573.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between a contractor named Hamilton and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY. The AUSA requests Hamilton to burn digital folders containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank related to the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' investigation onto a disc for a Special Agent and a Detective. The email coordinates the physical handover of this evidence, mentioning colleagues Mandy and Paul attending a conference.
EFTA00017028.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and likely FBI technical staff regarding the processing of terabytes of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant logistical challenges, including incompatible file formats, reduced staffing due to remote work (likely COVID-19 related), and the FBI's network replacement which involved deleting 400TB of old data. The USANYS expresses frustration over the lack of organization in the data dumps, mentioning specifically that 9 hard drives found in NY were actually copies from a 2007 search, and discusses the potential of hiring outside vendors (Kroll/BRG) to handle the processing.
EFTA00013954.pdf
This email exchange from September 17, 2008, between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) discusses the transfer of sensitive documents related to the Epstein case. The AUSA provides a draft letter to the Florida Bar, the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and confirms that a Special Agent is FedExing unredacted documents. The thread also references a 'Victim Notification Log' and an upcoming meeting with victims scheduled for that Friday, as well as a lack of communication from Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black.
Epstein victim call
Detailed report of initial call from a woman claiming to be a victim of Epstein and former client of a specific attorney regarding the Victim Fund.
just in case
Sender forwards draft non-prosecution and plea agreements from their AUSA folder, noting they might not be obvious otherwise and hoping they become useful.
Rule 23 motion
Reporting a call from Brad (victims' counsel) regarding whether they should file a response to a defense motion. Stated assumption of no position/neutrality.
new ASAC on Epstein
Mentions a new ASAC (Assistant Special Agent in Charge) who is described as 'an OC guy' (Organized Crime).
RE: [Redacted] follow-up question
Acknowledgment of receipt ('Thanks and understood re: both.').
[REDACTED] new and redlined
Email containing attachments related to a draft submission.
Maxwell draft elements, order of proof
Email sending a draft document titled '2020-02-11,_Maxwell,_draft_elements_and_order_of_proof.docx'.
RE: Epstein investigation
Follow up regarding a possible meeting with Ms. [Redacted] in New York next week.
RE: Epstein investigation
Jill confirms client is willing to help but requests a morning meeting for introductions, afternoon for questions, and for a US lawyer friend to be flown to London to attend.
RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Initial complaint about disorganized data transfer; hard drive contains mixture of old and new materials; specific folder 'NYC024362' has 600,000 items; request for guidance and a tracking spreadsheet.
RE: Epstein investigation
Acknowledging receipt of Jill's previous email.
RE: Epstein investigation
Detailed email outlining interview process: voluntary nature, comfort of witness, typically 2 prosecutors and 2 officers present, majority female team, focus on employment scope rather than graphic details initially. Offers to come to UK.
Re: Epstein investigation
Jill asks who will be in the room, who has access to notes, and expresses concern about anonymity in US vs UK.
RE: Epstein investigation
Explains who is in the room (prosecutors + FBI), note-taking process (FBI Form 302), and anonymity policies (names not disclosed publicly).
Initial contact/follow up
Memorializing views that client is a victim, not a suspect. Interested in general narrative of interactions with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell (whom she worked for).
Epstein -- travel approval form
Submission of 'Sweden travel memo' after delay in OIA approval; request for Office and final DOJ approval.
U.S. Department of Justice investigation
Inquiry from federal prosecutors investigating Jeffrey Epstein to confirm legal representation of HRH The Duke of York and request to discuss.
RE: message for [Redacted]
Notes that on '01/02/19' (likely typo for 2020), they 'left another message'.
message for [Redacted]
Notes that on 12/30/19, they left a message with a receptionist for [Redacted] re: Epstein case.
Unknown (Original Message)
Relaying request from Epstein Trustees to meet with higher leadership regarding civil forfeiture claims.
RE: [Redacted] entities subpoenas
Discussing subpoenas to entities in connection with the Epstein investigation and coordinating a call.
Re: U.S. v. Epstein call
Discussion regarding civil forfeiture call scheduling and request to certify destruction or return of discovery materials prior to nolle order hearing.
RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Discussing a draft response based on conversations with [Redacted] regarding defense letters and discovery motion schedule.
quick disc burn for agents
Request to burn a disc for agents on Epstein with materials from Fourth and Fifth Production folders. Specifies file path to Deutsche Bank subpoena returns.
RE: Epstein investigation [Redacted]
We wanted to follow up on our previous discussions and our meeting the week before last. Is there a good time for you early next week to discuss status?
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity