An email dated March 14, 2020, with redacted sender and recipients, discussing a news report about Prince Andrew cooperating with Jeffrey Epstein investigators. The sender asks the recipients if anyone spoke to 'the telegraph,' likely referring to The Telegraph newspaper, and includes a link to a Page Six article.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 13-14, 2020. Nicholas Biase distributed a daily press clipping digest to 'Chiefs' and later forwarded it to a redacted recipient, specifically noting the inclusion of articles related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists numerous hyperlinks to major news outlets covering the Maxwell/Epstein case, as well as other political and legal 'Matters of Interest'.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome, the lawyer representing Prince Andrew, spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ explicitly requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While Bloxsome claims the Prince desires to cooperate, tensions escalate when U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' leading Bloxsome to accuse the DOJ of breaching confidentiality agreements.
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, legal counsel for Prince Andrew, in January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While Prince Andrew's lawyers claim he desires to cooperate, they delay the interview to handle 'preliminary issues,' leading to public tension when US Attorney Geoffrey Berman tells the press there has been 'zero co-operation,' provoking an angry rebuttal from Blackfords.
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Embassy in London, dated June 9, 2020, containing a daily press roundup titled 'The SW11'. The primary story highlights the conflict between Prince Andrew's legal team and the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the Epstein sex-trafficking inquiry, with the DOJ accusing the Prince of refusing to cooperate. Other stories cover the toppling of the Colston statue in Bristol, UK government discussions on COVID-19 social distancing, Huawei's relations with the UK, and Hong Kong immigration rights.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (Southern District of New York) and Gary Bloxsome, the attorney representing Prince Andrew (Duke of York), spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence deteriorates into a dispute over confidentiality after US Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' which Bloxsome argues violates previous assurances of confidentiality and misrepresents the Duke's willingness to cooperate.
This document is an email chain from November 21, 2019, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and HuffPost reporter Sara Boboltz. Boboltz inquires whether Prince Andrew will submit to questioning by U.S. investigators regarding Jeffrey Epstein's potential co-conspirators, citing a report by The Telegraph. Nicholas Biase of USANYS responds internally stating that he will handle the response.
This document is an email thread dated October 13, 2020, forwarding a daily press clipping report from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The report lists various news articles, highlighting a section specifically for 'MAXWELL' which includes links to stories about Ghislaine Maxwell's legal case, photos, and Jeffrey Epstein's financial activities and associations (including Leon Black). The email sender flags these articles for the recipient's interest.
This document is a bibliography page (page 51) from a Freedom House report, marked with a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019285). It lists 18 citations for sources published between 2013 and 2016, focusing heavily on Russian geopolitics, information warfare ('The Russian World'), and military aggression in Ukraine, Crimea, and the Baltics. Although included in a dataset potentially related to other investigations, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 240-241) from a book, likely by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight control number. It discusses the state of affairs in September 2014, noting that FBI investigations into Epstein appeared stalled, while recounting a 2008 legal motion filed by lawyer Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities. Dershowitz is quoted denying these allegations entirely.
This document appears to be pages 238-239 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details the media fallout and legal questioning surrounding Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein around 2011. Specifically, it documents Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova invoking the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual misconduct involving Prince Andrew and underage girls, and lists numerous scandalous headlines from the British press regarding Andrew's demotion as trade envoy.
This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight files. It details the fallout of Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the British Royal Family around March 2011, specifically focusing on Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson. It describes Ferguson admitting Epstein paid £78,000 of her debt, resulting in a public scandal, and recounts the deposition of Epstein associates Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, who invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about Prince Andrew.
This document is a scan of pages 240-241 from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') produced as evidence for House Oversight. Chapter 63, set in September 2014, discusses the stalling FBI investigation into Epstein and recounts a 2008 legal motion filed by Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities, which Dershowitz denied.
This document is a scan of pages 240 and the subsequent page from a book by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text contrasts the massive media coverage of Prince Andrew's scandals (specifically regarding a 'gun smuggler') against the backdrop of the 2011 Japan earthquake. The second page begins a section on Alan Dershowitz, detailing a legal motion filed in early 2008 by a lawyer named Brad (likely Brad Edwards) on behalf of two unnamed women, accusing Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's trafficking activities.
This document contains an excerpt from a book detailing legal depositions related to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, specifically focusing on Prince Andrew and Nadia Marcinkova invoking the Fifth Amendment. It also lists numerous newspaper headlines from the British press concerning the controversy surrounding Prince Andrew's relationship with Epstein.
This document is a scanned page (likely from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich') stamped as a House Oversight exhibit. It details the media fallout in March 2011 regarding Prince Andrew's connection to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically revealing that Epstein paid off a £78,000 debt for Sarah Ferguson (Andrew's ex-wife). The text also notes that Epstein associates Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova invoked their Fifth Amendment rights when questioned about Prince Andrew during civil lawsuits.
This document is an event flyer or webpage printout advertising a talk titled 'Trump Under Fire' featuring author Michael Wolff in conversation with Matthew d'Ancona. The event was scheduled for June 21, 2019, at the Emmanuel Centre. The text includes promotional copy for Wolff's book on the Trump White House and reviews from various media outlets. While part of the House Oversight document dump (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026976), the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an internal email or press draft from John Brockman (Edge.org) announcing 'The EDGE Question 2012.' It solicits essays on the topic of 'deep, elegant, or beautiful explanation[s]' from a network of intellectuals. The document lists submission deadlines for mid-January 2012, acknowledges Steven Pinker for suggesting the topic, and thanks advisors Stewart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and George Dyson. The document includes a House Oversight Bates stamp (023455), indicating it is part of a collection of documents likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's association with Brockman and the scientific community.
This document appears to be a printout of a news article (likely from The Telegraph) originating from a House Oversight Committee file. It details the existence of a 'Black Book' or journal stolen by Epstein's servant, Alfredo Rodriguez, which Rodriguez termed 'The Holy Grail' due to its incriminating information regarding underage girls and high-profile contacts. The text highlights Epstein's connections to Bill Clinton (listing 21 phone numbers), Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew, and recounts Rodriguez's failed attempt to sell the book for $50,000, resulting in an FBI sting and his arrest.
A 2011 Telegraph article reporting that Jeffrey Epstein kept a 'black book' journal listing under-aged victims and celebrity associates, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. The article details how a servant at Epstein's Palm Beach manor stole the journal and was imprisoned for trying to sell it, and mentions Prince Andrew's stays at the property where he received daily massages. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document is page 269, which contains the endnotes for Chapter Twenty-One, titled "The Russians are Coming." It lists thirteen sources, including news articles, government documents, books, and interviews, related to Russian history, espionage, and intelligence operations involving agencies like the KGB, CIA, and NSA.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity