HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138.jpg
1.63 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Book excerpt / congressional oversight document
File Size:
1.63 MB
Summary
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 240-241) from a book, likely by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight control number. It discusses the state of affairs in September 2014, noting that FBI investigations into Epstein appeared stalled, while recounting a 2008 legal motion filed by lawyer Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities. Dershowitz is quoted denying these allegations entirely.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Dershowitz | Lawyer/Friend of Epstein |
Subject of the chapter; accused of participating in illegal activities; denies accusations.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Financier/Subject |
Subject of lawsuits and stalled FBI investigation regarding trafficking.
|
| Bradley Edwards | Lawyer |
Fort Lauderdale lawyer who filed a motion in 2008 on behalf of accusers.
|
| Prince Andrew | Royal/Associate |
Accused by unnamed women of participating in Epstein's illegal activities.
|
| Unnamed Women | Accusers |
Two women represented by Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Dershowitz.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Conducting an investigation into Epstein regarding trafficking across state lines.
|
|
| The Telegraph |
Media outlet mentioned on page 240.
|
|
| West Palm Beach court |
Venue where Bradley Edwards filed the 2008 motion.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
September 2014
Timeline setting for the chapter; status check on FBI investigation.
N/A
Start of 2008
Filing of a legal motion accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.
West Palm Beach court
Bradley Edwards
Two unnamed women
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location associated with lawyer Bradley Edwards.
|
|
|
Location of the court where the 2008 motion was filed.
|
Relationships (2)
Described as 'Epstein's friend and sometime lawyer Alan Dershowitz'
Edwards filed motion 'on behalf of two unnamed women'
Key Quotes (3)
"If the ongoing lawsuits are costing Epstein millions, he has millions left to spare."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138.jpg
Quote #1
"Meanwhile, the FBI’s investigation into whether Epstein trafficked underage women across state lines seems to be going nowhere."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138.jpg
Quote #2
"“There’s absolutely no kernel of truth to this story,” he’d said."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,234 characters)
PATTERSON
ng undersea earthquake and tsu-
d by several feet, shifting the earth
s horrific and unprecedented. But
evotes four pages and seven sepa-
That same day, the Telegraph runs
imes runs a two-page spread head-
WAY OVER ANDREW.
dian runs one more piece about
d by several feet, shifting the earth
s horrific and unprecedented. But
evotes four pages and seven sepa-
That same day, the Telegraph runs
imes runs a two-page spread head-
WAY OVER ANDREW.
dian runs one more piece about
HEADLINES DESPITE THE EARTHQUAKE,
240
CHAPTER 63
Alan Dershowitz: September 2014
If the ongoing lawsuits are costing Epstein millions, he has millions left to spare. Meanwhile, the FBI’s investigation into whether Epstein trafficked underage women across state lines seems to be going nowhere. As 2014 draws to a close, it’s beginning to look as if Epstein is finally free and clear of the case.
But for Epstein’s friend and sometime lawyer Alan Dershowitz, things are about to get very unpleasant.
At the start of 2008, Bradley Edwards, the Fort Lauderdale lawyer, had filed a motion in a West Palm Beach court on behalf of two unnamed women accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating directly in Epstein’s illegal activities.
Prince Andrew had had no comment to make, and Dershowitz had objected to the accusations in the strongest possible terms.
“There’s absolutely no kernel of truth to this story,” he’d said.
241
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022138
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document